Buying a company out of insolvency
Buying a company out of insolvency
Author
Discussion

500 Miles

Original Poster:

1,798 posts

256 months

Saturday 11th April 2020
quotequote all
Hello,

Has anyone ever bought a company, or it’s assets, out of insolvency?

What was the process? Did the insolvency practitioners want to gain value from the assets or just close down the business?

Have seen a local business listed in the London Gazette and looks like insolvency company was instructed about a month ago - I may be interested in taking on the lease and buying some of the equipment they have.

Grateful to hear of anyone’s experiences.

springfan62

923 posts

106 months

Saturday 11th April 2020
quotequote all
Yes I have bought the assets out of an insolvent company that I worked for.

We paid them a small amount for assets and then agreed an earn out for 12 months for software intellectual property.

Contact the insolvency practitioners direct and express interest, they may though have already agreed to sell to existing owners.


500 Miles

Original Poster:

1,798 posts

256 months

Saturday 11th April 2020
quotequote all
Thanks for the quick response - good old Pistonheads!

Did wonder whether it might have just been a way for the old owners to shed liabilities, will make contact and see what they say.

Thanks again.

sleepezy

2,141 posts

264 months

Saturday 11th April 2020
quotequote all
Yes, several times. The IP should be seeking best value for the creditors so they should be willing to talk, so long as they've not prepacked it (which may have been a valid strategy).

They'll want you to be able to move quickly, prove funding and accept they won't sell with warranties.

Edit, as I've just reread your post. Bought assets only, never the company. Its possible to buy a company in admin and take it out, I've seen it done once. It would be highly unusual. I guess you could even buy a company in liquidation and terminate the appointment via Court. Never seen that done and can't see a real reason why you'd want to.

Edited by sleepezy on Sunday 12th April 09:12

akirk

5,778 posts

144 months

Saturday 11th April 2020
quotequote all
Cynical view is that insolvency practitioners want to cover their fee, so as long as your offer is high enough for that..,

trickywoo

14,229 posts

260 months

Sunday 12th April 2020
quotequote all
Hopefully it goes without saying that buying the company itself isn’t something you should do without very, very careful consideration.

Buying assets from it can get you good deals as already said.

500 Miles

Original Poster:

1,798 posts

256 months

Sunday 12th April 2020
quotequote all
Thanks everyone for your contributions.

You are correct, would be looking to buy assets and perhaps take on a lease as opposed to buying the business.

Thanks again

sleepezy

2,141 posts

264 months

Sunday 12th April 2020
quotequote all
If you're taking over the lease (of the insolvent company) use this to your advantage. The IP is under a duty to maximise realisations - if he can 'deliver' an outcome that takes on the lease he minimises claims against the estate (improving returns for all the other creditors) and eliminates, or at least significantly mitigates, the claim of a creditor (the landlord).

You should include this in your offer calculation to prove the point. It could put you in a better position than others who just want assets, depending on the offers of course.

skwdenyer

18,707 posts

270 months

Wednesday 15th April 2020
quotequote all
sleepezy said:
If you're taking over the lease (of the insolvent company) use this to your advantage. The IP is under a duty to maximise realisations - if he can 'deliver' an outcome that takes on the lease he minimises claims against the estate (improving returns for all the other creditors) and eliminates, or at least significantly mitigates, the claim of a creditor (the landlord).

You should include this in your offer calculation to prove the point. It could put you in a better position than others who just want assets, depending on the offers of course.
If you take over a lease by assignment then be careful about any historical liabilities. May be best to negotiate a new lease from the landlord.

Tuna

19,930 posts

314 months

Thursday 16th April 2020
quotequote all
Quick question - how are people finding insolvent/failed/on the brink companies? In which industries?

sleepezy

2,141 posts

264 months

Thursday 16th April 2020
quotequote all
Tuna - all the bigger IP's run lists of parties that may be interested in acquiring something - get on those lists gets you onto their email system for the sectors you specify. Most are busy at the moment but less than you'd imagine - the real issue are still to come.

500 Miles

Original Poster:

1,798 posts

256 months

Thursday 16th April 2020
quotequote all
Tuna said:
Quick question - how are people finding insolvent/failed/on the brink companies? In which industries?
As Sleepezy said - you can also search on the Gazette.

https://www.thegazette.co.uk/insolvency

anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 16th April 2020
quotequote all
sleepezy said:
They'll want you to be able to move quickly, prove funding and accept they won't sell with warranties.
Just curious on the warranties point here. Surely there must be some warranties? For example that any equipment included in the sale is legally theirs to sell? Lease agreements are correct etc? Or are there genuinely no warranties at all?

sleepezy

2,141 posts

264 months

Friday 17th April 2020
quotequote all
MikeStroud said:
Just curious on the warranties point here. Surely there must be some warranties? For example that any equipment included in the sale is legally theirs to sell? Lease agreements are correct etc? Or are there genuinely no warranties at all?
The really short and simplified answer is "yes".

The longer answer is that there are some wrinkles - especially since Receiverships died back and Administrations came to the fore.

It's one of the main reasons why you can pick up assets cheaply (alongside speed of sale) - there's a risk / reward position.

It is getting harder - a couple of examples:
H&S - now have to get a second hand machinery waiver agreed in case any of the equipment is defective
GDPR - now very hard to sell mailing lists - which can be a significant hindrance to selling an online business

The above are bits of legislation that normally make sense but in the event of an insolvency either increase costs or reduce realisations - thereby reducing the amount available for distribution to creditors.

But in essence - things like stock are sold with the administrator taking at most reasonable steps to ensure they have clear title, but they won't warrant that (in case of for example ROT claims). Lease agreements tend to be terminated on insolvency - the administrator will aim to provide a licence to occupy to give you time to negotiate with the Landlord but no warranty that you'll be successful (my point above being that if can negotiate a novation you limit the landlords claim thereby improving the overall outcome, hence why include in offer).

The onus is on the acquirer to undertake diligence, not the vendor. If you're buying stock for 20% cost there has to be a balance.

If there's a prolonged push to stop assets being sold out of insolvency without warranties then the upshot will be far smaller returns to creditors.

There will always be exemptions on high value items where the work is worth the effort - that is the uplift in value exceeds the cost - just not for run of the mill stuff.

skwdenyer

18,707 posts

270 months

Friday 17th April 2020
quotequote all
sleepezy said:
MikeStroud said:
Just curious on the warranties point here. Surely there must be some warranties? For example that any equipment included in the sale is legally theirs to sell? Lease agreements are correct etc? Or are there genuinely no warranties at all?
The really short and simplified answer is "yes".

The longer answer is that there are some wrinkles - especially since Receiverships died back and Administrations came to the fore.

It's one of the main reasons why you can pick up assets cheaply (alongside speed of sale) - there's a risk / reward position.

It is getting harder - a couple of examples:
H&S - now have to get a second hand machinery waiver agreed in case any of the equipment is defective
GDPR - now very hard to sell mailing lists - which can be a significant hindrance to selling an online business

The above are bits of legislation that normally make sense but in the event of an insolvency either increase costs or reduce realisations - thereby reducing the amount available for distribution to creditors.

But in essence - things like stock are sold with the administrator taking at most reasonable steps to ensure they have clear title, but they won't warrant that (in case of for example ROT claims). Lease agreements tend to be terminated on insolvency - the administrator will aim to provide a licence to occupy to give you time to negotiate with the Landlord but no warranty that you'll be successful (my point above being that if can negotiate a novation you limit the landlords claim thereby improving the overall outcome, hence why include in offer).

The onus is on the acquirer to undertake diligence, not the vendor. If you're buying stock for 20% cost there has to be a balance.

If there's a prolonged push to stop assets being sold out of insolvency without warranties then the upshot will be far smaller returns to creditors.

There will always be exemptions on high value items where the work is worth the effort - that is the uplift in value exceeds the cost - just not for run of the mill stuff.
On the specific property point, there’s seldom time to do proper due diligence on a lease in an insolvency scenario.

If you take an assignment you are potentially liable for all claims - including things like dilapidations - since the lease started. Is there a schedule of condition? Where is it? Have any changes been made to the building by the current tenant and are they properly evidenced with landlord’s consent? Are there any rent reviews outstanding, going right back to the inception of the lease? Etc. Be even more careful in the case of an FRI lease.

Since the administrator won’t provide any warranties on this stuff, you can only believe the evidence of your own investigations with the landlord and available paperwork (if there is any)!

anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 23rd April 2020
quotequote all
skwdenyer said:
sleepezy said:
MikeStroud said:
Just curious on the warranties point here. Surely there must be some warranties? For example that any equipment included in the sale is legally theirs to sell? Lease agreements are correct etc? Or are there genuinely no warranties at all?
The really short and simplified answer is "yes".

The longer answer is that there are some wrinkles - especially since Receiverships died back and Administrations came to the fore.

It's one of the main reasons why you can pick up assets cheaply (alongside speed of sale) - there's a risk / reward position.

It is getting harder - a couple of examples:
H&S - now have to get a second hand machinery waiver agreed in case any of the equipment is defective
GDPR - now very hard to sell mailing lists - which can be a significant hindrance to selling an online business

The above are bits of legislation that normally make sense but in the event of an insolvency either increase costs or reduce realisations - thereby reducing the amount available for distribution to creditors.

But in essence - things like stock are sold with the administrator taking at most reasonable steps to ensure they have clear title, but they won't warrant that (in case of for example ROT claims). Lease agreements tend to be terminated on insolvency - the administrator will aim to provide a licence to occupy to give you time to negotiate with the Landlord but no warranty that you'll be successful (my point above being that if can negotiate a novation you limit the landlords claim thereby improving the overall outcome, hence why include in offer).

The onus is on the acquirer to undertake diligence, not the vendor. If you're buying stock for 20% cost there has to be a balance.

If there's a prolonged push to stop assets being sold out of insolvency without warranties then the upshot will be far smaller returns to creditors.

There will always be exemptions on high value items where the work is worth the effort - that is the uplift in value exceeds the cost - just not for run of the mill stuff.
On the specific property point, there’s seldom time to do proper due diligence on a lease in an insolvency scenario.

If you take an assignment you are potentially liable for all claims - including things like dilapidations - since the lease started. Is there a schedule of condition? Where is it? Have any changes been made to the building by the current tenant and are they properly evidenced with landlord’s consent? Are there any rent reviews outstanding, going right back to the inception of the lease? Etc. Be even more careful in the case of an FRI lease.

Since the administrator won’t provide any warranties on this stuff, you can only believe the evidence of your own investigations with the landlord and available paperwork (if there is any)!
A belated thanks to you both. I hadn't realised what a risky business (well riskier) it was buying an insolvent company. "Buyer beware" is probably more apt here than in any other case.