Attachment of Earnings Order - this can't be right!
Attachment of Earnings Order - this can't be right!
Author
Discussion

StevieBee

Original Poster:

15,277 posts

284 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
Had a team employed on a fixed term contract. One of them lasted just two weeks and had to fire him for various reasons.

His local authority have sent me two Attachment of Earnings Orders. Both were made / applied to the period during which he was employed by us but were received by us two weeks after him leaving and his final wages having been paid.

I informed them of this but they have come back and said that because the order was made during his period of employment with us, we are required to make the payments and recover the amount from him!!.... so we are effectively an unpaid debt collector for the local authority.

The amount isn't a lot (under £250) - but surely this cannot be right?

AndyC_123

1,285 posts

183 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
I had similar a few years ago.

Said he was no longer employed by us and that was that, they said they would just update their records. Things might have changed of course.

Ham_and_Jam

3,657 posts

126 months

Tuesday 1st September
quotequote all
StevieBee said:
Had a team employed on a fixed term contract. One of them lasted just two weeks and had to fire him for various reasons.

His local authority have sent me two Attachment of Earnings Orders. Both were made / applied to the period during which he was employed by us but were received by us two weeks after him leaving and his final wages having been paid.

I informed them of this but they have come back and said that because the order was made during his period of employment with us, we are required to make the payments and recover the amount from him!!.... so we are effectively an unpaid debt collector for the local authority.

The amount isn't a lot (under £250) - but surely this cannot be right?
I’ve done loads of these, and yes you do feel like an unpaid debt collector.

What is the date of the letter sent to you? Is it after the last pay date of the employee?

Either way it doesn’t sound right to enforce the AoEO after the employee has left your employment. Whenever I have spoken with our local authority they have been quite helpful with debt recovery issues.

I would call them again and speak to a different person. In simple terms explain you don’t have any way of contacting them. Why would you.

JimmyConwayNW

3,622 posts

154 months

Wednesday 2nd September
quotequote all
I've often felt employing people has put me into some sort of carer, therapist, advisor category but being a debt collector is a bloody new one.

Utterly ridiculous.

Benny Saltstein

795 posts

242 months

Wednesday 2nd September
quotequote all
We had similar in the old days of the CSA. Even had bailiffs turn up. Yes, its bullst.

22s

6,525 posts

245 months

Wednesday 2nd September
quotequote all
Benny Saltstein said:
We had similar in the old days of the CSA. Even had bailiffs turn up. Yes, its bullst.
That's mental. How did you resolve it with the bailiffs?!

StevieBee

Original Poster:

15,277 posts

284 months

Wednesday 2nd September
quotequote all
Thanks all.

So, a case of computer says no - but thankfully common sense prevails and we're no longer liable.

The order was made during the time they were employed by us but we received the AoEO after they had left. Apparently they send these to the employers one week before the month end so they can catch the next payroll. But as I pointed out and as applies to us in this case, there are still employers who pay a weekly wage.


Geoffcapes

1,276 posts

193 months

Yesterday (16:07)
quotequote all
22s said:
Benny Saltstein said:
We had similar in the old days of the CSA. Even had bailiffs turn up. Yes, its bullst.
That's mental. How did you resolve it with the bailiffs?!
I had something similar with the CSA.

However, I wished I knew what I know now back then. An attachment of earning (by the CSA at least) has to be agreed between the employer and employee.
Failure to do so, it a breach of employment law.
However, once it's in place, you have effectively waived your rights to not having it put in place.

With regards to the CSA Bailiffs, you just don't let them on the premises. Put a note on the door saying that if they enter they are trespassing and the police will be called.

You can't stop high court bailiffs though.

Ham_and_Jam

3,657 posts

126 months

Yesterday (19:56)
quotequote all
Geoffcapes said:
I had something similar with the CSA.

However, I wished I knew what I know now back then. An attachment of earning (by the CSA at least) has to be agreed between the employer and employee.
Failure to do so, it a breach of employment law.
However, once it's in place, you have effectively waived your rights to not having it put in place.

With regards to the CSA Bailiffs, you just don't let them on the premises. Put a note on the door saying that if they enter they are trespassing and the police will be called.

You can't stop high court bailiffs though.
That is not correct. An Attachment of Earnings Order is issued by the courts.

Ordinarily, deductions from wages need to be authorised by the employment contract. However, a court-ordered deduction is specifically one of the exceptions: GOV.UK confirms deductions can lawfully be made where “the court has told your employer to take debt payments.”

You may be referring to some other order that is specific to CSA payments, but AoEO have legally bound duties for an employer.

Countdown

49,220 posts

225 months

As above - there are certain statutory deductions where your Employer doesn't need your permission before making the deduction; Tax and NI are the two main ones. Salary overpayments are another one. Court orders/AEOs for child support or council tax debt are another common one.