Employing Staff - PAYE or S/C
Employing Staff - PAYE or S/C
Author
Discussion

Glassman

Original Poster:

25,056 posts

245 months

Wednesday 19th September 2007
quotequote all
What's better for the employer, PAYE or sub-contractor?

- and for the employee?

smartie

2,630 posts

303 months

Wednesday 19th September 2007
quotequote all
It's not your decision to make, either someone is self-employed or not.

If employers could choose, all would pick SE as they would avoid holiday pay, er's NI, sick pay, etc,etc.

Employees would also choose SE as they could claim expenses against their income.

IR wouldn't be happy! frown

Eric Mc

125,770 posts

295 months

Wednesday 19th September 2007
quotequote all
The Revenue like to think that you do not have the choice.

Genuine "employees" (including part timers or temp staff) MUST be processed under the PAYE and Class 1 NI regulations.

Only bona fide "sole trading" individuals can be taken on in self-employed a sub-contract capacity.

From an overall tax point of view, "self-employed" individuals are cheaper for the "employer" to use as there is no Employer's National Insurance liability arising on the payments made to them. In addition, the individual "employed" has the responsibility of ensuring that they return their tax details to the Revenue each year and pay their own tax and Class 2 and 4 NI. This, of course, reduces the admin burden on the "employer".

Be aware that there are special rules applying to those who work in a sub-contract capacity in the construction industry.

From a non-tax [point of view. an "employer" might think that he has more flexibility and less legal obligations to an individual who is not an employee. By and large, this is true. But there have been quite a few non-tax "Employee Status" cases where non-employees have been found to be "employees" for the purposes of determining holiday leave, maternity leave, unfair dismissal, redundancy rights etc. So, all is not as clear cut as some people might think.