Copyright / ratings aggregator
Discussion
If I was to have a website that featured a product, for example:
Sony Television (model X1)
...is it legal for me to state on my website what "scores" other magazines and websites gave that product when they reviewed it?
That is, could I say on my website:
Product: Sony Television (model X1)
- rated 6/10 by website1.com
- rated 5/10 by website2.com
- rated 8/10 by Your Television magazine
...and so on? Are the reviews covered by copyright, or are they in the public domain as they are not "creative"?
Hope this is clear, TIA.
Sony Television (model X1)
...is it legal for me to state on my website what "scores" other magazines and websites gave that product when they reviewed it?
That is, could I say on my website:
Product: Sony Television (model X1)
- rated 6/10 by website1.com
- rated 5/10 by website2.com
- rated 8/10 by Your Television magazine
...and so on? Are the reviews covered by copyright, or are they in the public domain as they are not "creative"?
Hope this is clear, TIA.
(to help, as no-one has replied)
It is officially a grey area (so, actually, not to help). Strictly speaking, the ratings would be copyright. In fact there is just such a case beginning in the USA. Certain news sites ordered bloggers not to quote from their news stories, then gave them restrictions (e.g. two lines) on what they could quote. The case has a long way to run.
However, back in the real world, it is unlikely to be a problem. In various ways, it is accepted (many sites, advertisements, movie posters, etc.), commonly without approval. I'm not aware of this being tested in the UK courts. So:
Another tack to take is to speak to the manufacturers. They may well have permission from the magazine which extends to resellers.
It is officially a grey area (so, actually, not to help). Strictly speaking, the ratings would be copyright. In fact there is just such a case beginning in the USA. Certain news sites ordered bloggers not to quote from their news stories, then gave them restrictions (e.g. two lines) on what they could quote. The case has a long way to run.
However, back in the real world, it is unlikely to be a problem. In various ways, it is accepted (many sites, advertisements, movie posters, etc.), commonly without approval. I'm not aware of this being tested in the UK courts. So:
- Stating "Geek Weekly - 5 stars" is unlikely to be a problem.
- Using a short quote is unlikely to be a problem, provided you do not misrepresent them (e.g. quoting "Works perfectly" when the actual quote was "Works perfectly, until the flames appeared"). However, quoting at length would be considered plagiarism, and they are more likely to get stroppy.
- Adding a link to the review is unlikely to be a problem
- Stealing or replicating the "Geek Weekly - 5 PS Gamepad" logo definitely breaches another area of copyright. Not particularly likely to be a huge problem, but perhaps better to seek permission.
Another tack to take is to speak to the manufacturers. They may well have permission from the magazine which extends to resellers.
Gassing Station | Business | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


