Libel Issue - Solicitors
Discussion
Slightly tricky one, our client has received a letter from a Solicitor acting on behalf of a debtor.
The letter wrongly claims that our client has stolen a laptop from the debtor (long line of intimidation tactics)
Now as far as the law of libel is concerned, would the fact that the debtor conveyed a false accusation to his Solicitor be regarded as the third party rule or not? ie is it libelous? or does communication between a client and his Solicitor not count?
The letter wrongly claims that our client has stolen a laptop from the debtor (long line of intimidation tactics)
Now as far as the law of libel is concerned, would the fact that the debtor conveyed a false accusation to his Solicitor be regarded as the third party rule or not? ie is it libelous? or does communication between a client and his Solicitor not count?
Edited by jamesuk28 on Monday 26th April 12:12
jamesuk28 said:
Considerable damage to their reputation (accussed of theft)
To one solicitor. How do you quantify that? £50?That is the issue here. If they go ahead and print this story in a newspaper then by all means that could run into potentially millions. It is also worth pointing out that the cost of bringing a libel action is in the five figure range.
Therefore solicitor tactics warning this are seen as toothless.
I would overlook this as best as possible but I don't see this as a route.
Gassing Station | Business | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


