FTP Problems
Author
Discussion

rico

Original Poster:

7,917 posts

279 months

Saturday 29th May 2004
quotequote all
I'm using Fetch 4.0.3 to upload files.

When i try to upload a pic it says:

fetch said:

Server response: caterham.jpg: RPC struct is bad


Anyone got any ideas?

(running Panther on 15in Apple Powerbook, but i haven't updated Fetch since upgrading to Panther...)

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

289 months

Saturday 29th May 2004
quotequote all
Try using a different client (ftp://usernameassword@ftp.yoursite.com) in IE should work.

I would wager its a local issue on your Crapintosh

Jay-Aim

598 posts

265 months

Sunday 30th May 2004
quotequote all
JamieBeeston said:
Try using a different client (ftp://usernameassword@ftp.yoursite.com) in IE should work.

I would wager its a local issue on your Crapintosh


never had an issue with ftp and ie

rico

Original Poster:

7,917 posts

279 months

Sunday 30th May 2004
quotequote all
JamieBeeston said:

I would wager its a local issue on your Crapintosh


jodypress

2,071 posts

298 months

Sunday 30th May 2004
quotequote all
rico said:

JamieBeeston said:

I would wager its a local issue on your Crapintosh





funny that, just had to solve yet another problem due to the very problematic xp pro. this time was eplorer.exe running at 100% cpu.
my so called "crapintosh" still running strong. guess my pc is due for is bi-annual OS reinstall.
i should get paid for troubleshooting windows problem.

rico

Original Poster:

7,917 posts

279 months

Sunday 30th May 2004
quotequote all
I agree... my Powerbook is just fantastic. Absolutely no problems. Compare that to friends with XP... don't know one who hasn't had problems.

Microsh*t morelike...

Bacardi

2,235 posts

300 months

Sunday 30th May 2004
quotequote all
rico said:
Microsh*t morelike...

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

289 months

Sunday 30th May 2004
quotequote all
jodypress said:

funny that, just had to solve yet another problem due to the very problematic xp pro. this time was eplorer.exe running at 100% cpu.
my so called "crapintosh" still running strong. guess my pc is due for is bi-annual OS reinstall.
i should get paid for troubleshooting windows problem.


all platforms have a single common bug,

their users.

A well installed, un fettled with Install of XP or OsX will be stable forever.

its only once users get theirs hands on them that they cause issues.

I have never EVER had a BSOD on XP, EXCEPT when I made cockups.

a) installed Beta Drivers -- BSOD
b) installed Beta SP2 -- BSOD

I support many G4 and now G5 Xserves, they also are mostly fine, save for their appetite for Memory Sticks, they do like to destory them!

BUT, the users error, does look like a local machine error, as ooposed to a Remote machine error.
that was my point

trooper1212

9,457 posts

276 months

Sunday 30th May 2004
quotequote all
JamieBeeston said:



A well installed, un fettled with Install of XP or OsX will be stable forever.

its only once users get theirs hands on them that they cause issues.


Absolutley correct.

The only time I ever have problems with my XP machine is when I install something with beta drivers, or when I install something with Microsft certified drivers, or when I try and use two USB items at the same time, or when I leave the machine on for over a week, or when I first switch it on and it decides not to boot up, or when I try and use it for email or surfing the web, or when I try and write a word document, or...

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

289 months

Sunday 30th May 2004
quotequote all
trooper1212 said:
Absolutley correct.

The only time I ever have problems with my XP machine is when I install something with beta drivers, or when I install something with Microsft certified drivers, or when I try and use two USB items at the same time, or when I leave the machine on for over a week, or when I first switch it on and it decides not to boot up, or when I try and use it for email or surfing the web, or when I try and write a word document, or...



Cheeky Monkey

I can only speak from experience, but I do accept the level and quality of Kit I am using if far beyond that of the home user environment.

ECC Ram = No More BSODs

dont overcook your Cpu = no more BSODS

dont try and install lots of 'aftermarketware' applications which replace integral Windows Components with their own versions (software firewalls/bandwidth throttlers etc)

Its all down to what you want to make of it.

BUT, in my first hand experience, I have seen 3 Xserves kill ram, first hand. I cant see how or why, they run very hot granted, but arent running 'overly hot' comparativly, but all the same, 3 so far have needed new ram.

Possibly just a bad batch of ram installed at source.

Anyway

Apples have their places, DB and Design.
PCs have their places Everywhere else!

Just like Linux and Windows have their places

but we are going OT here

Sorry Rico.

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

283 months

Monday 31st May 2004
quotequote all
"ECC Ram = No More BSODs"

I wish.

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

289 months

Monday 31st May 2004
quotequote all
m12_nathan said:
"ECC Ram = No More BSODs"

I wish.


Then you either have a serious Hardware issue, or you're running flakey drivers.

I have NEVER had a BSOD on ECC machines..

Still, I am sounding like an MS Pr Rep here.

given only 40 or so of my servers (10% or so) are windows based,

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

283 months

Monday 31st May 2004
quotequote all
We are running HP Proliant DL580s, DL360s, DL380s & DL740s with anything up to 8 processors and 10GB RAM, hardly shabby. Around 800 Production servers.

How would ECC memory prevent NMIs or the bug in NTFS.sys under very high usage?

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

289 months

Monday 31st May 2004
quotequote all
You are intimating that some if windows core subsystems are inherently flawed?

As that would be the only way for such issues to come about.

My point wasn't that ECC makes your machine infallible, as already stated, I can still induce a BSOD with ECC, it DOES however substantially reduce the chance of a BSOD.

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

283 months

Monday 31st May 2004
quotequote all
I spent the whole night once talking to a core engineer in the states regarding why one of my servers was blue screening 3 times a week - turns out there was a bug in NTFS.SYS which our usage was exploiting, probably wouldn't have been found during the beta testing as hardware has moved on and now you can push the OS harder.

There are loads of problems that you don't come accross until you start using the servers hard. Recently had 8 servers that failed to come up after the weekly reboot with a BSOD (the fact that that a weekly reboot is a requirement should say something), turns out we had found a hard coded limit to a certain registry key size and we had to rebuild the boxes (you can replicate this by adding about 1000-1500 print queues to a win2k server if you are interested). Luckily our automated server build means we can build and comission a server in about 1.5 hours so not too much down time for the business.

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

289 months

Monday 31st May 2004
quotequote all


As I said, The only thing to cause BSODS are Buggy Memory, Drivers and Programs

Remove the Memory with ECC, and you are left with Drivers and Programs.

and thats exactly what you found

Still, we are WAY OT

Enjoy.

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

283 months

Monday 31st May 2004
quotequote all
A driver being a core part of the OS and the program also being a core part of the OS

Win2k3 looks like It'll be much better from the testing we've been doing.

Cheers

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

289 months

Monday 31st May 2004
quotequote all
m12_nathan said:
A driver being a core part of the OS and the program also being a core part of the OS

Win2k3 looks like It'll be much better from the testing we've been doing.

Cheers



Ya, but EVERY single client managing their own 2k3 box as been hacked so far :|

Script Kiddes running (mostly german) Warez Sitez.

Still, you live and learn