Website Opinions please.
Discussion
I know I've done this one before, but I've now made some tweaks.
Can I have some honest opinions on our website please.
www.nova-design.co.uk
I need to get in a fit state to 'close' before getting it translated into another couple of languages.
TIA
Simon.
Can I have some honest opinions on our website please.
www.nova-design.co.uk
I need to get in a fit state to 'close' before getting it translated into another couple of languages.
TIA
Simon.
I'll be brief:
1) Cut the waffle between the pucture and the buttons. Just say there are three separate parts then go to the buttons.
2) Button text is small and fuzzy
3)Ditch that annoying flashing thing in the bottom left. It's really disctracting and makes the text hard to concentrate on.
Other than that, it's fine.
1) Cut the waffle between the pucture and the buttons. Just say there are three separate parts then go to the buttons.
2) Button text is small and fuzzy
3)Ditch that annoying flashing thing in the bottom left. It's really disctracting and makes the text hard to concentrate on.
Other than that, it's fine.
Agree with all of the above - that flashing nonesense is bad - plus you should tone down the Sales Brochure Request Form.
"Fields in RED are manadatory" sounds like I'm being interrogated by the Gestapo.
Normally mandatory fields a marked with an asterisk (*) - some people are color blind don't you know
The Adobe Acrobat link at the bottom of the Design Proposals page looks a bit lost - why is it there? and no need to advertise it opens in a new window - I'd expect nothing less and if I was worried I'd right click on it any way.
If it is required to view documements you are offering then put a message near the links saying Adobe Acrobat Required - Get It Here.
Your Finite Element Analysis page has a table on it that I can't read at my monitor resolution (1600x1200) - is it an HTML Table or a jpg?
Apart from that I really like - clean, crisp, uncomplicated and neatly layed out - good effort
best
Ex
"Fields in RED are manadatory" sounds like I'm being interrogated by the Gestapo.
Normally mandatory fields a marked with an asterisk (*) - some people are color blind don't you know
The Adobe Acrobat link at the bottom of the Design Proposals page looks a bit lost - why is it there? and no need to advertise it opens in a new window - I'd expect nothing less and if I was worried I'd right click on it any way.
If it is required to view documements you are offering then put a message near the links saying Adobe Acrobat Required - Get It Here.
Your Finite Element Analysis page has a table on it that I can't read at my monitor resolution (1600x1200) - is it an HTML Table or a jpg?
Apart from that I really like - clean, crisp, uncomplicated and neatly layed out - good effort
best
Ex
Very nice, clean, & easy to navigate, I do like it.
Couple of minor points - I did notice some inconsistent / incorrect capitals & aberrant apostrophes (e.g. on the Commitment to Quality" page).
Also, some links that aren't obviously links, due to them being red (without underlining). Since your convention is using red for emphasis throughout the rest of the site, it does initially make it more difficult to differentiate between what is a link and what isn't.
I'm probably just a pedant, but I did feel that these minor details influenced the "Quality" page especially.
Couple of minor points - I did notice some inconsistent / incorrect capitals & aberrant apostrophes (e.g. on the Commitment to Quality" page).
Also, some links that aren't obviously links, due to them being red (without underlining). Since your convention is using red for emphasis throughout the rest of the site, it does initially make it more difficult to differentiate between what is a link and what isn't.
I'm probably just a pedant, but I did feel that these minor details influenced the "Quality" page especially.
Gassing Station | Computers, Gadgets & Stuff | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff