Vodafone Fibre? Especially Gigafast? Anyone using?
Vodafone Fibre? Especially Gigafast? Anyone using?
Author
Discussion

JonChalk

Original Poster:

6,469 posts

141 months

Tuesday 17th September 2019
quotequote all
It's just being laid in our area, with much local disruption and mess.

Whilst I like the idea of 900Mb/s; given that;

a) it isn't really "Giga", is it now? is it 1Gb/s+? No.
b) I've got 78Mb/s, as has everyone else locally, so can happily stream 4K, as well as other stuff at same time
c) Vodafone offer no media / tv packages
d) BT TV won't work on it
e) I'd need to subscribe to Sky again :-(
f) the infrastructure is tied to Vodafone only & I dislike Vodafone
g) it's £48/month

..what's the point?

Other than claiming that they've improved "access" to super-giga-mega-fast broadband, wouldn't this money have been better spent improving access for those still on intermittent dial-up speeds?

James-gbg1e

482 posts

111 months

Tuesday 17th September 2019
quotequote all
Vodafone, the most memorable internet experience of my 20 years as a service user, and not in a positive way.

Absolutely p*** poor, utterly shocking.

alorotom

12,790 posts

218 months

Tuesday 17th September 2019
quotequote all
With the march of 5G it’s even more pointless and unnecessarily expensive!

anonymous-user

85 months

Tuesday 17th September 2019
quotequote all
James-gbg1e said:
Vodafone, the most memorable internet experience of my 20 years as a service user, and not in a positive way.

Absolutely p*** poor, utterly shocking.
I’ve had them a month with no issues at all. Should I be worried for future? biggrin

vaud

59,883 posts

186 months

Tuesday 17th September 2019
quotequote all
alorotom said:
With the march of 5G it’s even more pointless and unnecessarily expensive!
Depends on your use case.

It you are pulling down 100s gb a month then 5g will be more expensive vs good fibre. If you are watching a few movies a month and have 5g coverage (good luck with that in the next 12 months) then yes, probably cheaper.

JonChalk

Original Poster:

6,469 posts

141 months

Wednesday 18th September 2019
quotequote all
vaud said:
Depends on your use case.

It you are pulling down 100s gb a month then 5g will be more expensive vs good fibre. If you are watching a few movies a month and have 5g coverage (good luck with that in the next 12 months) then yes, probably cheaper.
^This. My hub has current uptime of 28 days, during which I have 425GB of "download".

Art0ir

9,423 posts

201 months

Thursday 19th September 2019
quotequote all
alorotom said:
With the march of 5G it’s even more pointless and unnecessarily expensive!
Unless you live in a major city center you will not be getting 5G any time soon. And unless you are sitting on your front door step or a balcony with line of sight to the antenna, you will not be getting anything near advertised speeds.

blank

3,766 posts

219 months

Thursday 19th September 2019
quotequote all
JonChalk said:
It's just being laid in our area, with much local disruption and mess.

Whilst I like the idea of 900Mb/s; given that;

a) it isn't really "Giga", is it now? is it 1Gb/s+? No.
b) I've got 78Mb/s, as has everyone else locally, so can happily stream 4K, as well as other stuff at same time
c) Vodafone offer no media / tv packages
d) BT TV won't work on it
e) I'd need to subscribe to Sky again :-(
f) the infrastructure is tied to Vodafone only & I dislike Vodafone
g) it's £48/month

..what's the point?

Other than claiming that they've improved "access" to super-giga-mega-fast broadband, wouldn't this money have been better spent improving access for those still on intermittent dial-up speeds?
I've been wondering the same as my street is due to be done soon. Why they're doing areas that already have fibre to the property is beyond me!

JonChalk

Original Poster:

6,469 posts

141 months

Friday 20th September 2019
quotequote all
blank said:
I've been wondering the same as my street is due to be done soon. Why they're doing areas that already have fibre to the property is beyond me!
Daft! It's like electricity companies running their own sets of cables to your house.

If there was a proper joined-up strategy, the infrastructure installers / suppliers would be independent, then the ISPs could compete to supply FTTH over the same cable.

vaud

59,883 posts

186 months

Friday 20th September 2019
quotequote all
blank said:
I've been wondering the same as my street is due to be done soon. Why they're doing areas that already have fibre to the property is beyond me!
Because they know the existing demand, usage and can probably easily convert existing customers, which has less risk?

madcowman

222 posts

149 months

Friday 20th September 2019
quotequote all
I've had it a while now - been very happy with it. I could only get 10Mbit/sec on DSL ( on a good day with a following wind ) where I live - cost wise its been neutral for me as I WFH, so claim it back as my office line. Reliability wise there has been a couple of outtages - but I still have my DSL to fall back to.

chow pan toon

12,959 posts

268 months

Friday 20th September 2019
quotequote all
It is going in down my road as we speak. I can't wait to get away from Virgin. I'm on one of the higher packages but the reliability has become noticeably worse in the last couple of years and the traditional £3 rises have added up. My work is increasingly reliant on uploads nowadays so a symmetrical 500 will be ideal for me.