Home Computer Initiative (HCI) Ended
Home Computer Initiative (HCI) Ended
Author
Discussion

billybongo

Original Poster:

20 posts

247 months

Thursday 23rd March 2006
quotequote all
What a shame that this Goverment in it's infinite wisdom has pulled the plug on the tax concessions available to employees under the Home Computer Initiative.

1500+ people employed in the industry to deliver these schemes to employers/employees will now be looking for other jobs.

[url]http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/[/url]


>> Edited by billybongo on Thursday 23 March 11:34

zumbruk

7,848 posts

290 months

Thursday 23rd March 2006
quotequote all
"The Treasury said yesterday the scheme had benefited too many higher rate taxpayers"

God forbid that those already paying more tax than average should derive any benefit.

mattley

3,039 posts

252 months

Thursday 23rd March 2006
quotequote all
I'm surprised by that. I'd have thought that high rate taxpayers would have brighter than to subscribe to that nonsense.

The deal was appalling. The £1500 pound computer was actually a £600 machine with a piss poor software bundle, bought on PC Worlds store credit. So even with the tax break you still ended up paying about a grand for a £600 machine.

Total Rip off, good riddence.

page3

5,198 posts

281 months

Thursday 23rd March 2006
quotequote all
Ahhhhhrrrr!

our company was in the process of setting this up - but we are told it cannot be completed in time before the deal ends

I had a nice new 20" Intel iMac lined up...

Plotloss

67,280 posts

300 months

Thursday 23rd March 2006
quotequote all
zumbruk said:
"The Treasury said yesterday the scheme had benefited too many higher rate taxpayers"

God forbid that those already paying more tax than average should derive any benefit.


Does the article really say that?

True colours shining through it seems.

The scum.

Kinky

39,944 posts

299 months

Thursday 23rd March 2006
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
Does the article really say that?


press article said:

The Treasury said yesterday the scheme had benefited too many higher rate taxpayers and the chancellor wanted to focus on improving internet access for the unemployed and pensioners. The tax benefit will remain in place for those who have already bought computers.


Interesting to note it was 'slipped' out as a seperate communication, and not part of the budget announcement. A good day for burying bad news eh?

K

Don

28,378 posts

314 months

Thursday 23rd March 2006
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
zumbruk said:
"The Treasury said yesterday the scheme had benefited too many higher rate taxpayers"

God forbid that those already paying more tax than average should derive any benefit.


Does the article really say that?

True colours shining through it seems.

The scum.


Apparently in due course ISAs (particularly Cash ones) will be stopped too. Too many higher rate tax payers benefitting.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

300 months

Thursday 23rd March 2006
quotequote all
Do what Don?

Can someone please pinch me, I appear to be in some sort of living nightmare.

What exactly is the impotus to achieve anymore?

Or should we all be happy to be mugged of 40% Robin Hood style to provide a cheap leather sofa and a cheaper LCD TV to each of the unwashed masses.

GregE240

10,857 posts

297 months

Thursday 23rd March 2006
quotequote all
Don said:
Plotloss said:
zumbruk said:
"The Treasury said yesterday the scheme had benefited too many higher rate taxpayers"

God forbid that those already paying more tax than average should derive any benefit.


Does the article really say that?

True colours shining through it seems.

The scum.


Apparently in due course ISAs (particularly Cash ones) will be stopped too. Too many higher rate tax payers benefitting.
Oh, great.

Robbing bastards.

slapmatt

1,132 posts

252 months

Thursday 23rd March 2006
quotequote all
I agree with mattley - we had this offer and it was dogshit.

mcflurry

9,190 posts

283 months

Thursday 23rd March 2006
quotequote all
Ours was an ok spec machine, from Dell, but with the 3 year warranty.
That cancelled some of the tax free saving.

However, since my Dell lappy has gone wrong 3 times since it turned 1 year old I am glad it does have next day business cover

billybongo

Original Poster:

20 posts

247 months

Thursday 23rd March 2006
quotequote all
If the Treasury's issue is that to many higher rate tax payers were benefiting, then a more appropriate step would be cut the benefit to limit the concession to basic rate of tax only.

They make a mockery of theselves with Central Goverment (DTI) having just launched their HCI scheme to their staff and also the Dept of Work & Pensions just about to launch their HCI scheme to staff.

Seems that the Government want to focus on giving PC 'benefits' to the unemployed - what a joke - I'm sure eBay will do a roaring trade !!

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

256 months

Friday 24th March 2006
quotequote all
mattley said:
I'm surprised by that. I'd have thought that high rate taxpayers would have brighter than to subscribe to that nonsense.

The deal was appalling. The £1500 pound computer was actually a £600 machine with a piss poor software bundle, bought on PC Worlds store credit. So even with the tax break you still ended up paying about a grand for a £600 machine.

Total Rip off, good riddence.

The deals were done on a company-by-company basis. I got £3K's worth of computer for ~£1.7K, so it worked for me.

zumbruk

7,848 posts

290 months

Friday 24th March 2006
quotequote all
BTW, did you know that the threshold to be a "higher paid employee" (not a higher *rate* employee) is £8500/year. If you earn more than that, then benefits in kind are treated as taxable.

It's never gone up since the day it was introduced.

And on the IT front, if companies loan a PC to an employee to allow them to work at home, it is to be treated as a £200/year taxable benefit liable to income tax and NIC.

Cheers, Gord, you moron.

r988

7,498 posts

259 months

Friday 24th March 2006
quotequote all
zumbruk said:
BTW, did you know that the threshold to be a "higher paid employee" (not a higher *rate* employee) is £8500/year. If you earn more than that, then benefits in kind are treated as taxable.



So thats everyone on full time employment then, isn't that less than minimum wage?

toby tucker

648 posts

294 months

Sunday 26th March 2006
quotequote all
For those of you that feel strongly enough to do something about the Governemnet cancelling HCI without any warning , then there's a petition you can sign to let the Mr Brown and his cronies know of your displeasure, The link is as follows:

[url]www.petitiononline.com/hci/petition.html[/url]

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

256 months

Sunday 26th March 2006
quotequote all
toby tucker said:
For those of you that feel strongly enough to do something about the Governemnet cancelling HCI without any warning , then there's a petition you can sign to let the Mr Brown and his cronies know of your displeasure, The link is as follows:

[url]www.petitiononline.com/hci/petition.html[/url]

With the greatest respect, signing this petition will have a fraction of the effect that would be achieved were the signatories to write to their MPs.

zumbruk

7,848 posts

290 months

Sunday 26th March 2006
quotequote all
CommanderJameson said:
toby tucker said:
For those of you that feel strongly enough to do something about the Governemnet cancelling HCI without any warning , then there's a petition you can sign to let the Mr Brown and his cronies know of your displeasure, The link is as follows:

[url]www.petitiononline.com/hci/petition.html[/url]

With the greatest respect, signing this petition will have a fraction of the effect that would be achieved were the signatories to write to their MPs.


Given that B'Liar paid no attention to the protests against the invasion of Iraq, I can't imagine he's going to pay any attention to this. Other than admitting another 10,000 immigrants with IT skills to take your jobs.

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

256 months

Sunday 26th March 2006
quotequote all
zumbruk said:
CommanderJameson said:
toby tucker said:
For those of you that feel strongly enough to do something about the Governemnet cancelling HCI without any warning , then there's a petition you can sign to let the Mr Brown and his cronies know of your displeasure, The link is as follows:

[url]www.petitiononline.com/hci/petition.html[/url]

With the greatest respect, signing this petition will have a fraction of the effect that would be achieved were the signatories to write to their MPs.


Given that B'Liar paid no attention to the protests against the invasion of Iraq, I can't imagine he's going to pay any attention to this. Other than admitting another 10,000 immigrants with IT skills to take your jobs.

Clearly, then, sitting around doing nothing (which is, in UK parliamentary terms, signing this petition amounts to) is the best option! Forward! Vive La Neue Labourevolution!

Your MP is under no obligation to respond to an internet petition. He has to write back to you if you write to him, so it's worth it, if only for the (admittedly minor) embuggerance you cause.