Flash memory failure...
Author
Discussion

Podie

Original Poster:

46,649 posts

305 months

Wednesday 19th July 2006
quotequote all
I've just been having a chat with someone about flash memory failure / data loss. Apparently it's very common (I know this sort of industry preys on fear, like with AV), but was just curious how many people have experienced it...

So;

a) Have you experienced it on a digital camera card, or a "pen" drive...? (including accidental formating!)

b) whether they believed they had aided that problem (dropped it in water, left it in the sun, went in the washing machine)

c) whether they managed to recover the data themselves, or required an external company to retrieve it? (or simply didn't bother!)

Edited by Podie on Wednesday 19th July 11:21

pdV6

16,442 posts

291 months

Wednesday 19th July 2006
quotequote all
a) yes
b) no
C) partial recovery via software tool.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

269 months

Wednesday 19th July 2006
quotequote all
I had one lose data once. W98 machine (I know, I know!) hung copying from a USB drive and had to be rebooted. The USB stick was empty on reboot. I tend to view them as storage for copies of something that's also saved on a more reliable medium.

malman

2,258 posts

289 months

Wednesday 19th July 2006
quotequote all
a) yes pen drive
b) No
c) No (dead as the proverbial)

mark_T

66 posts

275 months

Wednesday 19th July 2006
quotequote all

a) yes - SD Card in Ipaq PDA
b) possibly - pda battery ran out of juice
c) data re-installed from back up.

ThatPhilBrettGuy

11,810 posts

270 months

Wednesday 19th July 2006
quotequote all
a) Yes. CF card
b) No.
c) No. Went from 256mb card to reporting 18mb, then died next day.

Podie

Original Poster:

46,649 posts

305 months

Wednesday 19th July 2006
quotequote all
Blimey... more common than I thought it seems...

randlemarcus

13,646 posts

261 months

Wednesday 19th July 2006
quotequote all
Yes, a fair few times
Yes, ranging from washing machines (The USB drive survived this quite nicely, the SD card less so) to death by crushing (put USB drive on sill, shut door)
Yes, as I regard flash memory as convenient transport, not archival storage.

However, this may change when I get a flash based UMPC later on in the year.

bga

8,134 posts

281 months

Wednesday 19th July 2006
quotequote all
a. Yes - pen drive
b. Yes & No (one got crushed, one just went screwy)
c. did nothing, anything important I have the file on another machine & usu backed up to online storage.

twister

1,592 posts

266 months

Wednesday 19th July 2006
quotequote all
Never had a card/pendrive spontaneously lose data, but I have had various problems over the years with smartmedia and (less frequently) SD cards becoming corrupted due to iffy read/write hardware - was always able to recover the card data with low-level tools though, and in all but one instance I was also then able to reformat (SD) or reinitialise the CIS (I think that's what it's called anyway-the bit of "smart"media cards that is notorious for being trashed) and return the card to normal.

Did manage to completely trash a SM card by forgetting to put it in its protective case before sticking it in my trouser pocket and then climbing over a set of railings... crunch!

Darth Dave

2,253 posts

262 months

Wednesday 19th July 2006
quotequote all
I've seen data loss on pen drives where the hardware device wasn't stopped properly prior to removal. Apart from that they seem to be ok.

As mentioned above - I never use them for anything I wouldn't mind losing and wouldn't be able to replace. If you need to backup use a CD.

pdV6

16,442 posts

291 months

Wednesday 19th July 2006
quotequote all
Darth Dave said:
If you need to backup use a CD.

...as long as you don't need the data for more than a year or 2?

annodomini2

6,973 posts

281 months

Wednesday 19th July 2006
quotequote all
Flash memory has a generally advised maximum number of write cycles, usually around 100. Although cheaper stuff can be as low as 10 and some will go up to 10,000 although rare.

A new type of memory called MRAM has been released, which has the storage capability of a hard drive (not capacity as yet), but the access/write time approaching SRAM (what is generally used in l1/l2 cache in your microprocessor). And importantly 1. no degredation over multiple read/write cycles as above and 2. Additionally no fade loss as per normal ram requiring refreshing of the ram.

twister

1,592 posts

266 months

Wednesday 19th July 2006
quotequote all
annodomini2 said:
Flash memory has a generally advised maximum number of write cycles, usually around 100. Although cheaper stuff can be as low as 10 and some will go up to 10,000 although rare.


You're either reading some ancient datasheets, or you're looking at figures for embedded flash inside microcontrollers and other programmable devices. The type of flash used in data storage devices typically has a lifespan of at least 100,000 cycles, with 1,000,000+ not being unusual.

annodomini2

6,973 posts

281 months

Wednesday 19th July 2006
quotequote all
twister said:
annodomini2 said:
Flash memory has a generally advised maximum number of write cycles, usually around 100. Although cheaper stuff can be as low as 10 and some will go up to 10,000 although rare.


You're either reading some ancient datasheets, or you're looking at figures for embedded flash inside microcontrollers and other programmable devices. The type of flash used in data storage devices typically has a lifespan of at least 100,000 cycles, with 1,000,000+ not being unusual.


I checked and you are correct, please ignore my above statement.

size13

2,033 posts

287 months

Wednesday 19th July 2006
quotequote all
Podie said:
Blimey... more common than I thought it seems...
You're only getting yes replies though...

I'll add

a) No
b) No
c) No need

I have a buffalo pendrive that is about 4-5 years old, the case is broken and its been fairly abused and still works now. It's not used so much anymore, it's only 128mb

Edited by size13 on Wednesday 19th July 16:00

Podie

Original Poster:

46,649 posts

305 months

Wednesday 19th July 2006
quotequote all
size13 said:
Podie said:
Blimey... more common than I thought it seems...
You're only getting yes replies though...


Agreed, and I had expected only to get positives... just surprised at how many have actually died - greater than I would have thought.