Printer capability question.
Author
Discussion

BliarOut

Original Poster:

72,863 posts

270 months

Friday 8th December 2006
quotequote all
I'm comparing printers.... The HP colour laserjet 1000 looks fine for my home office however there's one bit where it doesn't compare as well as the 2000 (which is about £100 more)

Typeface support on the 1000
Based on installed typefaces on host computer; print engine has fonts for internal pages and ASCII only.Based on installed typefaces on host computer; print engine only has fonts for internal pages and ASCII

Typeface support on the 2000
80 built-in fonts available for both PCL and HP Postscript emulation, printer-matching screen fonts in TrueType format available with the software solution 80 scalable TrueType fonts.


I'm mainly going to be printing my own letterheads containing invoices etc and flyers/application forms. I want them to look nice but as I'm only running with a temporary logo etc. I don't have any stationery as yet.

Do people think the 1000 will be able to handle printing out nice glossy flyers.

Speed isn't an issue, 8ppm is fine for me and the 1000 uses less power.

What does PH think?

dilbert

7,741 posts

262 months

Friday 8th December 2006
quotequote all
Strike me down with a feather, if I'm wrong, but I don't think it'll matter much.

It's the fonts that you are paying for. This is important if you pass postscript direct to the printer, and that's what makes it postscript compatible. Postscript will assume that the printing device knows about it's fonts.

If you print PCL with TTF from Windows, then the font information comes from the computer anyhow. Since TrueType is a pretty extensive capability it's hardly a significant limitation to go for PCL. In theory Postscript can be faster, although in most text scenarios it's not by a wide margin.

I'd have thought Postscript really pays off when working with Solaris and such where native font support is perhaps less comprehensive.

As I say strike me down with a feather.

BliarOut

Original Poster:

72,863 posts

270 months

Friday 8th December 2006
quotequote all
So the only real difference I would notice is PPM. The 2000 is 4 PPM quicker but that makes no difference to me and the 1000 uses less power too.

Seems like a no brainer to me

Plotloss

67,280 posts

301 months

Friday 8th December 2006
quotequote all
I think, personally, that you should look at getting a litho printer to do stationary and print on it using a mono laser.

Flyers done digitally.

The reason I say this is two fold.

Professionally printed stationary looks better.

Each toner for a HP colour laser is about £70 and there are 4 of them...

BliarOut

Original Poster:

72,863 posts

270 months

Friday 8th December 2006
quotequote all
Mental note to self... Check cartridge world refilling prices!

I don't want to do many flyers at the mo, but I do want a reasonable appearance when I communicate on paper with my customers.

I normally invoice on PDF anyway!

How's your project going?

Plotloss

67,280 posts

301 months

Friday 8th December 2006
quotequote all
Still havent got the final nod but rescued a lost cause this week so not all bad.

BliarOut

Original Poster:

72,863 posts

270 months

Friday 8th December 2006
quotequote all
PM if I can help in any way.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

301 months

Friday 8th December 2006
quotequote all
Will do, thanks mate

greenlandy

1,635 posts

262 months

Saturday 9th December 2006
quotequote all
Rob these people supply refill kits for lasers don't no if yours is supported though.
www.refilltoner.com/index.htm Image drums aren't cheap either and the later ones can't be fooled into thinking they have more life left in them.

IMHO steer clear of HP colour lasers have a look at the entry level xerox hot wax printers.

HTH Matt

Txt me if you want some suppliers

BliarOut

Original Poster:

72,863 posts

270 months

Saturday 9th December 2006
quotequote all
I've got a shop now Well the beginnings of one

I'll have a look at the Xerox, I think I sell them.

It's all go Matt, you need to jump on the bandwagon, it seems to be working out.....