C220/C250 diesel
Author
Discussion

apache

Original Poster:

39,731 posts

301 months

Tuesday 17th October 2006
quotequote all
Hi, new to the marque and am tempted by one of these for my other half. Commutes daily about 35 miles round trip. What's the mpg like on them and is the auto bettr than the manual?

CatherineJ

9,586 posts

260 months

Tuesday 17th October 2006
quotequote all
I had a 2005 C220 CDI which I bought to try and get better fuel economy than the 27 I got out of the M3.

I only managed to better the M3 by about 7 or 8 MPG.

apache

Original Poster:

39,731 posts

301 months

Tuesday 17th October 2006
quotequote all
for a diesel?!!

CatherineJ

9,586 posts

260 months

Tuesday 17th October 2006
quotequote all
Exactly my thoughts. I was told that the consumption had suffered when the engine went EU4.

There was talk of a software fix from Mercedes, but the car went before Mercedes launched it.

97+04

17,517 posts

227 months

Wednesday 18th October 2006
quotequote all
yeah I had a 55 c220d. I was only getting high 20's.

Thats 1 reason why it went

pentoman

4,832 posts

280 months

Wednesday 18th October 2006
quotequote all
That's rubbish!

Older models (which original poster is talking about?) should be better though? Auto is never going to help fuel consumption but this seems a bit off?

The 220 would/shuold presumably be better than the not common rail 250.

apache

Original Poster:

39,731 posts

301 months

Wednesday 18th October 2006
quotequote all
Ah, so the 220 is the better bet? and, yes, I'm talking £3k here so it won't be of this decade

pentoman

4,832 posts

280 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
The five cylinder 2.5 turbo is not bad I don't think, although I think that block dates back quite a way (as does VWs 1.9 TDi). 150bhp. But a bit more of an old-school diesel, almost certainly more laggy and less responsive. But for engineering and reliability who knows, it may be better than the CDI. The CDI was developed during Mercedes' worst cost cutting years.

niva441

2,049 posts

248 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
I was getting 38mpg out of my 98 C250 TD Auto, my current C220 auto is now getting about 43. It's taken about 6k miles for it to loosen up and achieve this, initially it was getting about 38.

deva link

26,934 posts

262 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
They're awful on fuel if you have to stop/start a lot - they're heavy cars to get moving. The engines also take a lot of warming up - my fuel consumption doesn't settle down (up?) on cold days for 40 miles or so.

I have C270CDi auto and it'll do 30MPG on short commutes, but I really only use it for long motorway runs, where I can see 50MPG given reasonably clear traffic (high 40's is no problem). All numbers are off the trip computer, so probably a bit optimistic.

niva441

2,049 posts

248 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
If it's an auto then that compromises the economy until it's into top gear and the torque converter locks up. So I tend to avoid using around town.