147 1.9 JTD Ti Multijet MPG question
147 1.9 JTD Ti Multijet MPG question
Author
Discussion

MPETT

Original Poster:

969 posts

228 months

Friday 17th December 2010
quotequote all
Have had a 147 alfa for a year now and on average we get around 42mpg, even on long motorway journeys. I read somewhere that we should be getting 47mpg on average. I noticed there is a big lag and a sudden boost from the turbo at 3000rpm. Was thinking maybe the turbo is on way out (56k miles) and this is causing a lower than average MPG?

Your thoughts are appreciate!
Cheers,
Martin

wrinx

680 posts

262 months

Friday 17th December 2010
quotequote all
Could be an MAF problem....but get the codes read to check, saves replacing parts unnecessarily.

wrinx

MPETT

Original Poster:

969 posts

228 months

Saturday 18th December 2010
quotequote all
wrinx said:
Could be an MAF problem....but get the codes read to check, saves replacing parts unnecessarily.

wrinx
The codes can tell me where the problem will be? Cool, I'll get on it. Cheers!

14-7

6,233 posts

213 months

Saturday 18th December 2010
quotequote all
Besides the MAF it could be a bracked pipe on the turbo leading to a loss of power. May be worth checking all the pipes leading to the turbo.

I will also say that manufacturers claimed MPG figures and actual MPG figures are worlds apart.

E31Shrew

5,962 posts

214 months

Saturday 18th December 2010
quotequote all
We get about the same MPG as you so seems to be the norm

MPETT

Original Poster:

969 posts

228 months

Sunday 19th December 2010
quotequote all
E31Shrew said:
We get about the same MPG as you so seems to be the norm
That is disappointing re the quoted mpg. At the last service there should have been a tune up, but it wasn't carried out by an Alfa specialist, so I'll get that done. He can check the pipes at the same time. I'm also going to try some magic bullet fuel additive and see if a de coking of the internals helps.
Cheers for the advice everyone!
Martin

macdeb

8,720 posts

277 months

Monday 20th December 2010
quotequote all
We have a 147 LUSSO JTD 8 valve from new. It's now done 44k miles and we've averaged 46 mpg. You're not far off. Have to say it's been THE BEST CAR WE'VE EVER HAD, and still drives like new. Good choice.
PS; also have a TVR. cool

MPETT

Original Poster:

969 posts

228 months

Monday 20th December 2010
quotequote all
macdeb said:
We have a 147 LUSSO JTD 8 valve from new. It's now done 44k miles and we've averaged 46 mpg. You're not far off. Have to say it's been THE BEST CAR WE'VE EVER HAD, and still drives like new. Good choice.
PS; also have a TVR. cool
Clearly a man that likes to drive cars with passion! wink

I'm going to try some Magic Bullet fuel additive to give the internals a clean out. Hopefully I'll get up to your levels!

Cheers,

Martin

E31Shrew

5,962 posts

214 months

Monday 20th December 2010
quotequote all
macdeb said:
We have a 147 LUSSO JTD 8 valve from new. It's now done 44k miles and we've averaged 46 mpg. You're not far off. Have to say it's been THE BEST CAR WE'VE EVER HAD, and still drives like new. Good choice.
PS; also have a TVR. cool
Agree. I still get a very slight buzz when I'm driving it. Great little car

jamieboy

5,921 posts

251 months

Monday 20th December 2010
quotequote all
MPETT said:
macdeb said:
We have a 147 LUSSO JTD 8 valve from new. It's now done 44k miles and we've averaged 46 mpg.
I'm going to try some Magic Bullet fuel additive to give the internals a clean out. Hopefully I'll get up to your levels!
The 147 TI should be the 16-valve JTDm, not sure how big a difference that makes. Our 147 Ducati Corse, with the 170bhp version of the 1.9 JTDm, gives around 40mpg-ish.

scottb147

30 posts

207 months

Tuesday 21st December 2010
quotequote all
Similar figures here with our 147 DC, the Mrs gets 37-39 about the doors, if I take the car to work i'll get 42-44mpg.
Thought it'd loosen up with some miles on it, at 30k now and hardly any difference in mpg since new.
It does go well for an oil burner though! I wouldn't question the MAF unless it was dipping below 35.
It seems like alfa quote higher than actual mpg on their cars, 2.4 159's don't seem to be doing book figures either.