Wemasters, your attention please..............
Wemasters, your attention please..............
Author
Discussion

MattNM3E36

Original Poster:

5,449 posts

289 months

Thursday 20th May 2004
quotequote all




>>> Edited by MattNM3E36 on Tuesday 29th June 18:57

mashie

39 posts

278 months

Friday 21st May 2004
quotequote all
Why 7+

I have 5 and been running Google Ads since September

Btw, the CPC for IT related ads are the lowest you can get.

>> Edited by mashie on Friday 21st May 11:50

MattNM3E36

Original Poster:

5,449 posts

289 months

Sunday 23rd May 2004
quotequote all
Hi,

we've got to 5 and have now begun to see our adwords costs drop because of this.

Getting to 5 took a lot of hard SEO work, as you're probably well aware.

So as we have 5 already we need links from something substantially higher to see any PR benefits.

tim_s

299 posts

278 months

Monday 24th May 2004
quotequote all
MattNM3E36 said:
Hi,

we've got to 5 and have now begun to see our adwords costs drop because of this.

Getting to 5 took a lot of hard SEO work, as you're probably well aware.

So as we have 5 already we need links from something substantially higher to see any PR benefits.


if the links aren't from themed sites it won't do much. pr isn't what it used to be. search for anything in google and it'll prove my point. totally relevant sites don't show up, totally inrelevant sites with no pr do.

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

272 months

Tuesday 25th May 2004
quotequote all
hmm..... I've yet to see a real benefit on any search terms for a high page rank. For example, our company site has a higher page rank than our competitors, yet on any search terms I tried we were below our competitors.

SO I set up a "google bomb", and bang, we went second listing on google, jumping 30 results with no change in page rank or page content.

Second listing with a PR of 4 - the top result has no page rank. That tells me page rank comes a very distant second to having loads of incoming links.

The google listing algorithm is too easily corrupted, and as such should be ditched.