Long Journey - Big car or small car?
Long Journey - Big car or small car?
Author
Discussion

Boobonman

Original Poster:

5,700 posts

222 months

Monday 23rd May 2011
quotequote all
I have picked up a little driving job for my day off to take some items from WInchester to Newcastle for my OH's employer. I am being paid a set amount, out of which I must pay for my own fuel. I have two main choices of chariot for the journey.

1) '06 Toyota Aygo -

2) '97 BMW 323is Coupe

I'm assuming that even though the Gaygo's little one litre, 3 cyl powerhouse would be revving it's heart out for 500 solid miles, it would probably be somewhat more efficient than my 14 yr old, 2.5 litre six cylinder lump in the Bee Em. The question is, would it be significantly more efficient to encourage me to put up with its billy basic interior, hard seats, crap stereo and thrumming engine over the relative oppulance of its german counterpart?

For reference, I managed to coach a OBC indicated 41.9 MPG over a 200 mile trip through hilly Dorset and Devon countryside from the aging coupe, and frankly my girlfriend has absolutely no idea how many miles she could coax out of a full tank in the Gaygo.

Thoughts?


g3org3y

22,477 posts

221 months

Monday 23rd May 2011
quotequote all
Don't punish yourself. Take the BMW.

randlemarcus

13,646 posts

261 months

Monday 23rd May 2011
quotequote all
Parcel2go? hehe

Aygo will drive you scatty over that distance, but has the advantage of putting the strain on someone elses car, which is nice.

Enough profit in it to hire a diseasel?

Swoxy

2,842 posts

240 months

Monday 23rd May 2011
quotequote all
You're doing it for money. Take the Toyota and make more money. It's only for a day.

Boobonman

Original Poster:

5,700 posts

222 months

Monday 23rd May 2011
quotequote all
randlemarcus said:
Parcel2go? hehe

Aygo will drive you scatty over that distance, but has the advantage of putting the strain on someone elses car, which is nice.

Enough profit in it to hire a diseasel?
There is, but I'm not sure there would be enough benefit. A Mondeo or something would probably cost upwards of £40 for the day, I very much doubt there would be a £40 differential in fuel costs between 40mpg odd in the BMW and a hideous Mondeo diesel. I have the option of a 2006 330d but the economy in that isn't signifantly better than the 323i driven carefully, especially if you use any of its shove. You're also saying about putting ther miles on someone elses car, but it's my girlfriends, so I'm the first port of call if it 'starts making funny noises'.

Edited by Boobonman on Monday 23 May 23:19

R12HCO

826 posts

189 months

Monday 23rd May 2011
quotequote all
Depends how much money you are making IMO.

Fox-

13,575 posts

276 months

Monday 23rd May 2011
quotequote all
No brainer, take the BMW, set the cruise to the speed limit the whole way, return almost 40mpg, arrive relaxed.

wackojacko

8,581 posts

220 months

Monday 23rd May 2011
quotequote all
323i it and drive it like a Granny.

Boobonman

Original Poster:

5,700 posts

222 months

Monday 23rd May 2011
quotequote all
Swoxy said:
You're doing it for money. Take the Toyota and make more money. It's only for a day.
Yeah, but bearing in mind if we swing by a Moto M+S we are going to be relieved of the best part of a fiver for a Club sandwich (I'm not sating it's not worth it!) then I need to put things in perspective. City to city on AA Route Planner is 620 miles. If the difference is £10's worth of fuel then I'll take the comfy coupe. If it is £50 then I'll put up with the Aygo.

I must make it clear that I'm firmly in the 'take the comfy BMW' camp. My girlfriend is adamant that we ought to take the Gaygo as perception would indicate one is a modern, eco friendly fuel sipper and one is an aging coupe with a big (ish) 'Gas guzzling' engine, I'm, not so sure the reality would reflect this. Lets not forget also, thjat I reckon I would be able to catch 40 winks in far more comfort in the passenger seat of the German contender.

Edited by Boobonman on Monday 23 May 23:28

trackerjack

649 posts

214 months

Monday 23rd May 2011
quotequote all
Beemer, there is no contest.

sebhaque

6,534 posts

211 months

Monday 23rd May 2011
quotequote all
I drove an Aygo for a little while when I got my VXT serviced (yeah, fair trade etc). Surprisingly competant on the motorway, was able to cruise at 85 (er, 70 officer) without much trouble, and the aux input combined with the good quality speakers meant it wasn't a bad place to be. I even gave my missus and two of her mates into town, would have thought the little Aygo would have conked out with an extra ~200kg on board but it was great. My personal favourite aspect was the way you could rag it through first, second, and third, and only be doing 55 at the end of it - and the engine sounded great!

Definitely worth giving it a go, at worst you'll hate it and long for your BMW back, at best you'll love it and see what this mental poster sees in it. thumbup

Baryonyx

18,283 posts

189 months

Monday 23rd May 2011
quotequote all
The BMW is the easy choice. Comfortable coupes and saloons were made for cruising long distances with easy. Just don't rush your drive and you should find the fuel costs aren't too bad. It would be a miserable day in the Aygo. I have a Volvo S60 2.0L Turbo, and if I had to drive to Winchester (I live in Newcastle) I'd easily choose that over the Aygo.

Timberwolf

5,374 posts

248 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
Done this, both options. (Small car and big car).

Take the BM. The tiddler will be, as you've guessed, thrashing its little heart out and struggle to top 40mpg unless you drive it like a grandmother. The larger car with taller gearing will be getting close to that anyway.

Plus you're talking a few hundred miles in small car seats, with small car sound insulation, and small car reactions to crosswinds. You can do it, and you might even save some money, but every services past the halfway mark will represent almost unbearable temptation to pull off the motorway and stop.

GingerWizard

4,721 posts

228 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
Big one.

Prawo Jazdy

5,037 posts

244 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
Boobonman said:
girlfriend is adamant that we ought to take the Gaygo
We?! If you want maximum economy, ditch the ballast and go on your own.

EDLT

15,421 posts

236 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
How fast are you going to go? My old 3-pot Suzuki Swift would do 50mpg+ on the motorway as long as I stuck arounnd 65-70

On a 500 mile round trip
50mpg = 10 gallons of fuel used = £60.90
40mpg (you might drive a bit quicker) = 12.5 gallons of fuel used = £76.13

type

nerd

oldcynic

2,166 posts

191 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
Take the big car.

I can't even get my head around buying a small car any more.

Adam_W

1,098 posts

230 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
Take the BMW, that tiny toyota will be so tiring to drive it'll kill you.

Sam.F

1,145 posts

230 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
You will regret taking the Aygo if it's as windy as it has been the last few days - my OH used to have a C1 which I felt was downright dangerous in anything other than a light breath of wind. Being so light and quite tall/narrow made it a liability in crosswinds.

XitUp

7,690 posts

234 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
Prawo Jazdy said:
Boobonman said:
girlfriend is adamant that we ought to take the Gaygo
We?! If you want maximum economy, ditch the ballast and go on your own.
My girlfriend is considerably smaller than me, I'd make her do it and stay at home playing on the XBox. Win win.