Skylon gets a bit closer!
Author
Discussion

s2art

Original Poster:

18,942 posts

283 months

Eric Mc

125,772 posts

295 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
It just seems to be taking forever to get to these development stages.

Oakey

27,984 posts

246 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
Kelly Johnson called, he wants his blueprints back hehe

Eric Mc

125,772 posts

295 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
Oakey said:
Kelly Johnson called, he wants his blueprints back hehe
I bet he'd be impressed with the engines.

EDLT

15,421 posts

236 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
Why are the engines bent?

DJRC

23,563 posts

266 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
ESA's technical experts.

  • Giggle*
I just spent the day with them. Oh how I am rolling with laughter at that one!

I hate to be the bearer of bad news for this booty/money call PR exercise from REL, but ESA doesnt have any technical experts. The companies have technical experts, ESA has people who want to think they are and know they are funded without any commercial constraints or expectations on them.

In fact, just dont start me.

anonymous-user

84 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
EDLT said:
Why are the engines bent?
Thrust vector needs to be in one direction, and the intakes are best head-on to the approaching wind at the cruise attitude - thus the engine pods need to have this bend in it.

cazzer

8,883 posts

278 months

Wednesday 25th May 2011
quotequote all
Perhaps they should think of the agegroup of the people who may be releasing money to the project.

I suggest a slight redesign...


Eric Mc

125,772 posts

295 months

Wednesday 25th May 2011
quotequote all
Yes.

It IS HOTOL - although refined further. BAe pulled out of HOTOL when it saw that the technology would be costly to implement and would take many years to develop.

anonymous-user

84 months

Wednesday 25th May 2011
quotequote all
Sorry Eric. I went to a RAeS talk given by Alan Bond. This isn't HOTOL, it could be the 3rd cousin, twice removed of HOTOL. HOTOL, as said by the man himself, was pretty laughable when you got into the technical details, and what it would be able to do, on looking back.

I like HOTOL, I like the design, and there's someone with a desktop model of it in the next office to me at work, I enjoy looking at it, and wondering what could have been, but having seen what it could have achieved I can see why it was abandoned. The Skylon won't make flight ( I think I remember a figure for runway length of about 3 miles for instance), but a fresh design using the engines (which are the key-enablers and technology stumbling block at present) can't be far away - as alluded to in the article. I hope I get to go on the british Orion Clipper!

Some spaceplane pron....



Yeah, ok its from 2001 but still.....ultra cool.



And then there's good old Hotol...







They all look better than Skylon - which actually looks pretty good here...



And I would have liked them to make more of MUSTARD, but can't find much in the way of good images on the net.





Eric Mc

125,772 posts

295 months

Wednesday 25th May 2011
quotequote all
Well, I was thinking more of the concept - single stage to orbit using jet/rocket hybrid.

I have a half-finished Airfix 2001 Orion Shuttle somewhere abouts. I really need to finish it.

DJRC

23,563 posts

266 months

Thursday 26th May 2011
quotequote all
Its a booty call folks, nothing else.

Eric Mc

125,772 posts

295 months

Thursday 26th May 2011
quotequote all
Which is fair enough. They keep plugging away.