Recommend me a simple, tough camera
Recommend me a simple, tough camera
Author
Discussion

Jaguar steve

Original Poster:

9,232 posts

239 months

Sunday 29th May 2011
quotequote all
Time for a new camera - my Praktica is playing up and is way to complicated and fiddly to use.

What I actually need is a simple point and shoot, and all I need it for is holiday snaps. It's going to get some fairly hard use and physical handling so it'll have to be robust, reliable and made to last. I'd like the memory and battery capacity to take 100 or so photos of good enough quality to upload to a pc between downloads. Ideally it'll have a viewfinder but if not the screen must be bright and clear enough to use in strong sunlight. I'd like a flash and modest zoom and that's it - nothing more.

If Tonka Toys made cameras that's exactly what I'd buy, but they don't so over to you Chaps thumbup

andy-xr

13,204 posts

233 months

Sunday 29th May 2011
quotequote all
Canon G12 is an easy answer

Simpo Two

92,717 posts

294 months

Sunday 29th May 2011
quotequote all
I'd suggest one of the 'tough' cameras. DP Review had a group test a while back but I can't find it.

BigAlinEmbra

1,629 posts

241 months

Sunday 29th May 2011
quotequote all
One of the lads on the South America trip I was on had one of these and it impressed me.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00318CUKQ/ref=...

Seemed pretty bulletproof.

Globs

13,847 posts

260 months

Sunday 29th May 2011
quotequote all
BigAlinEmbra said:
One of the lads on the South America trip I was on had one of these and it impressed me.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00318CUKQ/ref=...

Seemed pretty bulletproof.
+1, I have the older 1030sw version of that, and it's fantastic.

sgrimshaw

7,587 posts

279 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
andy-xr said:
Canon G12 is an easy answer
Canon G12 is a very nice camera but doesn't match what the OP wants.

The DPReview test mentioned earlier is here:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q209waterproofgrou...

Personally, I've had several Pentax Rugged models and currently have the W90. They've all performed well and only been replaced because of me "upgrading".

the W90 is nice tough little camera, which I believe won the Gadget Show "Test to Destruction" of Cameras. It stood up to everything they chucked at it - and they were brutal.

Edited by sgrimshaw on Monday 30th May 06:25

Jaguar steve

Original Poster:

9,232 posts

239 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
sgrimshaw said:
andy-xr said:
Canon G12 is an easy answer
Canon G12 is a very nice camera but doesn't match what the OP wants.

The DPReview test mentioned earlier is here:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q209waterproofgrou...

Personally, I've had several Pentax Rugged models and currently have the W90. They've all performed well and only been replaced because of me "upgrading".

the W90 is nice tough little camera, which I believe won the Gadget Show "Test to Destruction" of Cameras. It stood up to everything they chucked at it - and they were brutal.

Edited by sgrimshaw on Monday 30th May 06:25
Just had a look at the Canon G12 and don't think that's what I need at all. It's got to be simple, quick and easy to use - the fewer features and buttons the better. I don't need them and want the purchase price to go into quality and robustness rather than features I'd never even know about let alone use.


GetCarter

31,243 posts

308 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
Easy. Canon S95

90% of these were taken with it: http://www.stevecarter.com/random/twits.htm

dwilkie

2,222 posts

215 months

Wednesday 1st June 2011
quotequote all
OK, it's Old, it's Simple, it's also about a tenner on ebay...

The Nikon Coolpix 2100 - I've had mine since new back in 2003/2004 and it's been practically everywhere without ever once failing on me. Indeed I still use it even now if I want something compact to take out instead of the Olympus. I've used other peoples P&S's and I still prefer the 2100.

Indeed some of the prints I had from Snapfish today were taken on it and at 6x4 you'd be hard pressed to tell the difference between that and the SLR (although admittedly, they were outside mostly in good light).

But seriously, it's cheap so if you break it, it's throwaway money (well, nearly throwaway money). Takes double-A's too so get some decent rechargables and you're good for well over 1000 shots. Heck if you want you're welcome to borrow mine tongue out

http://www.flickr.com/photos/dwilkie83/5757662339/... the ducks and horse were taken on it ages ago. Don't look too far for pictures using it on Flickr though, worryingly a lot of them seem to revolve around semi naked men in womens undies :\

Edited by dwilkie on Wednesday 1st June 09:36