MG's current TV advert. It's not having its intended effect
MG's current TV advert. It's not having its intended effect
Author
Discussion

Switch

Original Poster:

3,455 posts

205 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
I made the mistake of venturing near the television on sunday afternoon and the main advert in a break between parts of an Agatha Christie program was the advert for the new MG hatch thing with the MGB coming the other way.


I came away from this advert, not wanting their stupid new hatch, but a BRG MGB.......

I think they've shot them selves in the foot rather here.

davepoth

29,395 posts

229 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbplgppClQM

It just makes me think "wow, cars are big and ugly these days".

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

276 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
The Crack Fox said:
I'm glad they now only say 'designed and engineered in Britain' and have dropped their stupid claims to 'manufacture' them here.
Been to a Honda garage recently? biggrin

kambites

71,483 posts

251 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
Started my 'B up for the first time in about three years today with the aim of getting it back onto the road. What is it about old cars' engines that makes them smell so distinctive? cloud9

g3org3y

22,474 posts

221 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
The old model makes the new one look like a slab of st.

anonymous-user

84 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
And the old one was only an Austin Cambridge in drag smile

slimtater

1,035 posts

200 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
Is it just me (or my TV) but do the close ups of the new models lights make them look like they are wobbly?

Meoricin

2,880 posts

199 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
I think the expression of the two drivers said it all - the first driver looks over, somewhat put out at this disgustingly bland thing steaming past him; the second has the smug grin of the brand new company car driver on his face.

I know which I'd rather be driving.

Baryonyx

18,283 posts

189 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
Interested in the newest blandbox from MG? Not a chance.

Wondering why they never made a road going car based on the Metro 6R4? Yes. Imagine that - 3.0L V6 in the back, 4WD, body kit reigned in slightly, a normal sporty 1980's interior fitted - could have been an incredible car. Shame MG never have the stones to make it!

soad

34,663 posts

206 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
g3org3y said:
The old model makes the new one look like a slab of st.
Nicely put - straight to the point, no messing about biggrin

PlayersNo6

1,102 posts

186 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
No comment on the MG6 but OP reminded me of 0.43 in this ad back in the early 90s :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3uVsi_cUFM


kambites

71,483 posts

251 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
Baryonyx said:
Wondering why they never made a road going car based on the Metro 6R4? Yes. Imagine that - 3.0L V6 in the back, 4WD, body kit reigned in slightly, a normal sporty 1980's interior fitted - could have been an incredible car. Shame MG never have the stones to make it!
I suppose you could say much the same about any of the group-B rally cars.

Baryonyx

18,283 posts

189 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
I suppose you could say much the same about any of the group-B rally cars.
Sadly yes, but I wonder if MG's fortunes would have been changed by producing daring and successful hatchbacks (considering the Metro Turbo was spoken of, the Metro 6R4 could have been a huge hit) instead of going into the 90's making a second best roadster and tired saloons.

busta

4,504 posts

263 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
Baryonyx said:
Wondering why they never made a road going car based on the Metro 6R4? Yes. Imagine that - 3.0L V6 in the back, 4WD, body kit reigned in slightly, a normal sporty 1980's interior fitted - could have been an incredible car. Shame MG never have the stones to make it!
I suppose you could say much the same about any of the group-B rally cars.
Except the Renault 5 Turbo2, Peugeot 205 T16, Audi Quattro, Ford RS200...

robsco

7,875 posts

206 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
Good grief, it looks huge when it pulls alongside the little 'B.

kambites

71,483 posts

251 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
busta said:
Except the Renault 5 Turbo2, Peugeot 205 T16, Audi Quattro, Ford RS200...
Well if you're including small volume specials like that, the 6R4 was made in road going form as well. I believe they made around 200 "clubmans". Didn't all group-B cars sell almost exactly the same number of "road cars" at a stupid price for homologation reasons?

kambites

71,483 posts

251 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
Baryonyx said:
Sadly yes, but I wonder if MG's fortunes would have been changed by producing daring and successful hatchbacks (considering the Metro Turbo was spoken of, the Metro 6R4 could have been a huge hit) instead of going into the 90's making a second best roadster and tired saloons.
The MGF and then the MGTF were the best selling sports cars in the UK for just about every year of their production - "second best" I suppose is a matter of opinion, but they certainly didn't sell badly.

Baryonyx

18,283 posts

189 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
Well if you're including small volume specials like that, the 6R4 was made in road going form as well. I believe they made around 200 "clubmans". Didn't all group-B cars sell almost exactly the same number of "road cars" at a stupid price for homologation reasons?
Yes. I am not talking about 'stradale' or other road going homologation specials. I am talking about them selling a car based on the 6R4, and refined somewhat for every day use, but still essentially being a 3.0L 4WD beast with the engine in the boot! Much like Ford sold many, many Sierra Cosworths - and the demand for the RS500 far outstripped the supply (which was itself a homologation special).


Matt UK

18,084 posts

230 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
Meoricin said:
I think the expression of the two drivers said it all - the first driver looks over, somewhat put out at this disgustingly bland thing steaming past him; the second has the smug grin of the brand new company car driver on his face.

I know which I'd rather be driving.
+1

kambites

71,483 posts

251 months

Monday 30th May 2011
quotequote all
Baryonyx said:
Yes. I am not talking about 'stradale' or other road going homologation specials. I am talking about them selling a car based on the 6R4, and refined somewhat for every day use, but still essentially being a 3.0L 4WD beast with the engine in the boot! Much like Ford sold many, many Sierra Cosworths - and the demand for the RS500 far outstripped the supply (which was itself a homologation special).
Yes, that's a rather different proposition. However, would anyone have actually bought them? It would have been extremely expensive (50k+?), noisy, twitchy, utterly impractical and frankly not very good. They might have done it as a loss leader, but I can't believe they would have made any money out of it.

I think if MG needed anything, it was just to develop and build the MGF properly so they had a really viable successor to the MGB - something genuinely better than the competition.