Transverse engine and RWD
Transverse engine and RWD
Author
Discussion

Mr Gear

Original Poster:

9,416 posts

220 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
Does it exist on any car ever made?

I can't see the point if it does, it just niggles me that I don't know the answer to this question.

EDLT

15,421 posts

236 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
Lots of mid engined cars have a transverse engine.

Mr Gear

Original Poster:

9,416 posts

220 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
EDLT said:
Lots of mid engined cars have a transverse engine.
Of course, and that makes sense, but that wasn't what I meant, apologies. Should have clarified.


left to right

774 posts

206 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
lotus elise

left to right

774 posts

206 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
Land Rover Freelander well not RWD but does have rear driver shafts

paranoid airbag

2,679 posts

189 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
There was a front engined rwd aygo IIRC, as well as a mid-engined 'crazy' edition.

Mr Gear

Original Poster:

9,416 posts

220 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
left to right said:
Land Rover Freelander well not RWD but does have rear driver shafts
There are quite a lot of 4WD cars like this. Mitsubishi Evo, Audi TT etc etc etc. I think most are predominantly FWD but switch to 4WD if required, rather than being predominantly RWD.

Mr Gear

Original Poster:

9,416 posts

220 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
doogz said:
left to right, you're slightly missing the point. The OP meant, but didn't write, cars with engined mounted transversely in the front, and with only the rear wheels driven.
Correct, that is what I meant. Sorry I wasn't more clear in the OP.

Alfanatic

9,339 posts

249 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
I can't think of any. There doesn't seem any reason to do that, so I wouldn't be surprised if there are no examples, unless the US companies did one. They seem more inclined to be adventurous with their layouts.

Or some military or commercial vehicle where for some reason the propshaft had to go down one side of the chassis instead of down the middle scratchchin

98elise

32,621 posts

191 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
I can't see any advantage or reason for it so the answer has got to be no. Thats assuming you mean a normal car, rather than some obscure vehicle.

The nearest thing I can think of is a BEC track car with the engine beside the driver (it was a one off iirc). Thats really a mid engine though.

Mr Gear

Original Poster:

9,416 posts

220 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
Ok, well that's that then! smile

Alfanatic

9,339 posts

249 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
98elise said:
I can't see any advantage or reason for it so the answer has got to be no. Thats assuming you mean a normal car, rather than some obscure vehicle.

The nearest thing I can think of is a BEC track car with the engine beside the driver (it was a one off iirc). Thats really a mid engine though.
That's a point. I wonder if any old racing cars from the front engined age did that so that the propshaft could run beside the driver instead of under him, thus allowing the driver to be sat lower? I still can't think of any

renrut

1,478 posts

235 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
I'm assuming the OP made the mistake of missing out "front mounted transverse engine" and RWD only. Then I'd say no except maybe in some crazy concept cars.

It just doesn't make sense from an engineering point of view if you were making a new car as you have to change the direction of drive twice for no reason or benefit. Direction changes will cost power and economy so no one would really want to do it.

You'll probably only gain a few inches of space once manifolds are accounted for on a 4 pot.