"NO ESCAPE FOR SPEEDERS"
"NO ESCAPE FOR SPEEDERS"
Author
Discussion

supraman2954

Original Poster:

3,241 posts

261 months

Wednesday 26th May 2004
quotequote all

www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13106832,00.html

skynews said:

NO ESCAPE FOR SPEEDERS

New speed cameras able to snap drivers from one mile away are to be issued to police forces.

The ProLaser III is designed to weed out motorists who slow down just before conventional speed cameras and before accelerating when out of range.


The £8,000 hand-held devices take pictures so clear that they can even capture who is behind the wheel at the time.

Road users groups said the latest weapon in the war on motorists may be a step too far.

Edmund King, executive director of the RAC Foundation, said: "Why do we need high-tech cameras that can spot a car a mile away?

"Why not put the money into traffic cops who, unlike a speed camera, can stop a wide range of offences and not just speeding?"

He added that while Government statistics listed speeding as the seventh highest cause of accidents, inattention - where drivers may be looking for traffic cameras - was one of the highest.

Others said the distance from which the cameras can be used breaks promises to ensure measures to combat speeding are conspicuous to drivers.


The government has, at last, reacted to drivers complaints that speed cameras/guns are usually hidden from view – by producing one that works a full mile away. This way, the gun and operator are no longer hidden, but drivers still stand no change of seeing the smeggers.

I don’t see how the Prolaser 3 can take pictures though.

count duckula

1,324 posts

296 months

Wednesday 26th May 2004
quotequote all
They are tlking about the same thing here
[url]www.pistonheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=23&t=101762[/url]

By the looks of the unit on TV it was wired upto a black box under the tripod, nice touch on the report was the fact the scamera van was parked up round the corner and unit was on the path, just in case they could have seen the van, don't want to lose any money.


Malc

lunarscope

2,901 posts

264 months

Wednesday 26th May 2004
quotequote all
But there is no offence until the Police Officer has "formed an opinion of excess speed" and this is obviously impossible from anything more than a hundred metres or so.
Is the law going to change so that the speed-measuring equipment will become the primary evidnce rather than the corroboration ?

TheHobbit

1,189 posts

273 months

Wednesday 26th May 2004
quotequote all
Haven't these things been around for a couple of years? I'm sure I've seen news articles about handheld cameras that can take a pic at a mile away that are good enough to show the drivers face, and the car reg and also (handily) time, date, and speed stamp the picture......

supraman2954

Original Poster:

3,241 posts

261 months

Wednesday 26th May 2004
quotequote all
Sorry guys, didn't know this was done before.

lunarscope, what about fixed Gatsos and the like? No police opinion needed for NIP there!

lunarscope

2,901 posts

264 months

Thursday 27th May 2004
quotequote all
supraman2954 said:
Sorry guys, didn't know this was done before.

lunarscope, what about fixed Gatsos and the like? No police opinion needed for NIP there!

Fixed Gatsos are a special case. The radar is the "opinion of excess speed" and the photo & markings are the corroboration.