Why does Suzuki build stronger Bikes than Cars ?
Discussion
S3000 said:
Seriously Suzuki is building death machines like Hayabusa and GSXR.. while their cars are only good for city driving. This is ridiculous...
Can someone explain why they dont fit a Hayabusa engine to their cars ?
Because where they sell their cars the money is in town cars, offroad vehicles etc.Can someone explain why they dont fit a Hayabusa engine to their cars ?
I don't see the problem with a company specialising in specific areas, the majority of the market is flooded with options these days.
The Suzuki Swift is a nice little car, and their 4x4s aren't bad either. They do a slightly larger saloon which is supposed to be good to drive but its not really aimed at the UK market (it doesn't have a diesel option).
Trying to extend into more competitive sectors is stupid (See MG SV).
My old Swift was abused for years without dying, only the rear dampers + wheel bearings gave up because my dad rammed an entire flat-pack kitchen in the boot.
Trying to extend into more competitive sectors is stupid (See MG SV).
My old Swift was abused for years without dying, only the rear dampers + wheel bearings gave up because my dad rammed an entire flat-pack kitchen in the boot.
S3000 said:
Seriously Suzuki is building death machines like Hayabusa and GSXR.. while their cars are only good for city driving. This is ridiculous...
Can someone explain why they dont fit a Hayabusa engine to their cars ?
Death machines…..really?? Also a car and a bike are VERY differentCan someone explain why they dont fit a Hayabusa engine to their cars ?
trickywoo said:
redgriff500 said:
Also what are the service intervals and lifespan of a typical bike engine ?
About 6,000 miles and 200,000 miles respectively.Rg500, you're wrong about the torque. Busas and blackbirds have more than some cars. The problem with them is the low mass flywheel, clutch designed for hand operation,and clunky seq box. They're very easy to stall with the clutch flywheecombo.
yonex said:
A quick review of Busa powered Caterhams will reveal just how fragile they can be. Bike boxes and cranks are not man enough to lug a bodyshell around for any great length of time.
Another fallacy really, the biggest stressor on the drivetrain is the mechanical grip two 8 inch 48r tyres offer. The back torque through the gear box when changing down is much higher than than the donor bike was designed for. They also enable full throttle in every gear.As i said above the box is the weakspot, the cranks are generally strong enough. Most engine failures tend to come from oil starvation. Dry sumps are a must imo.
TRUENOSAM said:
Not sure about bikes but my old Suzuki Ignis sport was driven like it was stolen since day 1 and it never missed a beat in the 40k miles I knew/owned it
This. I couldn't believe how well built it was, simple, well engineered stuff. Those Hungarians sure do know how to bolt a car together!Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





