New Contract, IR35 Compliance & Risks
New Contract, IR35 Compliance & Risks
Author
Discussion

Tim330

Original Poster:

1,236 posts

228 months

Wednesday 13th July 2011
quotequote all
I've been offered a new role which will be office based & could either be worked as ltd co, paye umbrella, or agency paye. With the new agency workers directive coming into effect in October I'm keen to hear other contractors views on this if inside/outside ir35. (current role is ltd co)

Does anyone have the numbers for the no. of investigation HMRC carries out & their success rate on ir35?

Eric Mc

124,054 posts

281 months

Wednesday 13th July 2011
quotequote all
Such a statistic is irrelevant. Just make sure that YOUR situation is bomb proof.

Tim330

Original Poster:

1,236 posts

228 months

Wednesday 13th July 2011
quotequote all
I plan to be. I just wondered if anyone else who HRMC could try to catch as a disguised employee was concerned.

Eric Mc

124,054 posts

281 months

Wednesday 13th July 2011
quotequote all
Don't worry about anyone else.

The best thing is Google a few court case reports on IR35 and you will see how the cases that HMRC tackled came out. They win some and they lose some.

S3K04

138 posts

184 months

Eric Mc

124,054 posts

281 months

Thursday 14th July 2011
quotequote all
S3K04 said:
The "husband-wife" case is the infamous Arctic Systems Ltd case which HMRC eventually lost. However, it should not be in a listing of IR35 cases as it had precvious little to do with IR35 matters at all.


Tim330

Original Poster:

1,236 posts

228 months

Sunday 17th July 2011
quotequote all
An alternative to Ltd Co that has been suggested to me is to use

http://www.ppcontracts.co.uk/

who operate an interest free offshore loan type arrangement. This sounds a bit dodgy. I think I may settle with a paye ubmrella as the new job offered a better rate so I won't be any worse off & won't have to worry about a potential tax investigation for 7 years.

pincher

9,553 posts

233 months

Sunday 17th July 2011
quotequote all
With those offshore interest free loan arrangements, what would happen if the trustees of the company making payments suddenly decided, for whatever reason, to sell their loan book? Wouldnt that potentially put an awful lot of Contractors in serious trouble?

Eric Mc

124,054 posts

281 months

Sunday 17th July 2011
quotequote all
These are extremely risky set-ups and they are formly in the sights of HMERC.

Tim330

Original Poster:

1,236 posts

228 months

Sunday 17th July 2011
quotequote all
I did think what would happen if asked to repay the loan. The guide explains the loan money is held in a trust that is ring fenced & can't be claimed by the company or its creditors. But you do owe the money for the rest of your days.

Eric, are there any other "safe" tax efficient ways to operate as a one man contractor?

Mr Pointy

12,575 posts

175 months

Sunday 17th July 2011
quotequote all
Is there a problem with operating as limited company & simply drawing up an IR35 compliant contract & working in a compliant manner? Is the case that you are actually working as an employee & are trying to appear otherwise?

Eric Mc

124,054 posts

281 months

Sunday 17th July 2011
quotequote all
Tim330 said:
I did think what would happen if asked to repay the loan. The guide explains the loan money is held in a trust that is ring fenced & can't be claimed by the company or its creditors. But you do owe the money for the rest of your days.

Eric, are there any other "safe" tax efficient ways to operate as a one man contractor?
If you go about it the right way, a normal limited company can and does still work - you just have to make sure that you take on board ALL the aspects of the relationship with those you work for that could render you vulnerable to IR35.

Tim330

Original Poster:

1,236 posts

228 months

Sunday 17th July 2011
quotequote all
Well although the contract can be written to be ir35 compliant I don't think it would stand up to scrutiny. The role is mon-fri flexible start/finish time.
It will contain a right of substitution & no mutuality of obligation. But this will be the only client/income stream for the next year or so it could be viewed as disguised employment.
I've read websites with various ir35 tests & in most categories if answering honestly would fall inside.

Eric Mc

124,054 posts

281 months

Sunday 17th July 2011
quotequote all
Are you saying you get paid holidays, get paid when sick or absent, use the "employer" facilities such as canteens, gyms etc, are invited on staff outings and are looked on as one of the "staff"?.
If so, well, maybe you might have to bite the bullet and pay the correct tax and NI.

If it looks like an employee, acts like an employee and is treated like an employee - it is an employee.

On the other hand, if you ensure you keep yourself away from all those things that might mark you out as employee and go out of your way to highlight those factors that show you to be trading in your own right - then the dangers of IR35 should diminish.

Who is responsible for the work you do?

Who pays for the rectification of work you did if that work was done badly?

Can the "employer" seek recompense from you for bad work?

Have you taken out your own professional indemnity insurance (or any other business type insurances for that matter)?


Tim330

Original Poster:

1,236 posts

228 months

Monday 18th July 2011
quotequote all
Are you saying you get paid holidays, get paid when sick or absent, use the "employer" facilities such as canteens, gyms etc, are invited on staff outings and are looked on as one of the "staff"?.--No paid holidays/sick pay, just an hourly rate. Would get use of canteen

Who is responsible for the work you do?--Me

Who pays for the rectification of work you did if that work was done badly?--Me

Can the "employer" seek recompense from you for bad work?--Yes

Have you taken out your own professional indemnity insurance (or any other business type insurances for that matter)?--This is required

I have decided from reading more on where HMRC have been sucessful eg Dragonfly case to just use a paye ubmrella for this contract.

Eric Mc

124,054 posts

281 months

Monday 18th July 2011
quotequote all
Based on your answers I think you could have argued successfully that you WERE NOT an employee. The only problematic area would be using the canteen - so I would make sure I bring a box of sandwiches with me every day.

Umbrellas do not resolve the IR35 problem.

Alex

9,978 posts

300 months

Monday 18th July 2011
quotequote all
As a general rule of thumb, if you are outside IR35, the Agency Worker Directive should not apply. Of course, the reality is more complicated.

worsy

6,257 posts

191 months

Tuesday 19th July 2011
quotequote all
Agree with Eric (although not sure about the canteen being a problem, especially if visitors have access)

Other things to watch out for:
One to one reviews
Having to request permission for a day off
Being directed in your role


and steer well clear of the off shore loans.