4 pot Ultima engine?
4 pot Ultima engine?
Author
Discussion

UltimaCH

Original Poster:

3,181 posts

213 months

Thursday 21st July 2011
quotequote all
The LS engines could also be going down this road soon and we'll have 4 pot Ultimas eekhttp://pistonheads.com/news/default.asp?storyId=23...

GTRCLIVE

4,193 posts

307 months

Thursday 21st July 2011
quotequote all
I don't see why you couldn't use a Nice Evo Engine or a High boosted Cossy of some sort. Mated to a Audi Box that might be fun..... But suspect the cost not to dissimilar to a LS3 G50/03 combo anyway... Unless you have an engine allready...

I'd love to see a 4 rotor Mazda engine with twin turbos.... Now that's an engine that would make for a great sound...

RXHeven

31 posts

195 months

Thursday 21st July 2011
quotequote all
Here you go. He's since switched to a single turbo making over 1600 hp.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35Q9FhURrRs

Now imagine what this sounds like?
http://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=945021

Moogle

257 posts

194 months

Thursday 21st July 2011
quotequote all
Aren't the automatic Camaro's with the 'L99' V8 engines already active fuel management/displacement on demand and can switch to four cylinders?

I assume where an LS3 can be made to fit, so can the L99 but I'm not sure if it can be worked out with a manual transmission?

Gulf LS3

1,922 posts

228 months

Thursday 21st July 2011
quotequote all
a subaru flat 4 with a 2.5 bottom end (400bhp) and you could also use the gearbox with a little work. It will be a little lighter but will it be any better on juice?

I think a nice Audi V6 diesel with 2 big turbos would be fun 500-600 ftlbs, you could also use the Audi transaxle.

Storer

5,024 posts

239 months

Thursday 21st July 2011
quotequote all
Is everyone mad.

These car's are about big V8 or V12 engines. Yes, they can be high revving or, if you must, turbo-ed/supercharged but not 4 cylinder or wk*rs.

The least that would sound acceptable would be a flat six (with turbos).

If you want to fit a 4 cyl or rotary please buy something else to fit it into.

Paul

Gulf LS3

1,922 posts

228 months

Thursday 21st July 2011
quotequote all
with fuel at £6.50 a gallon a lot of us have to look at alternative powerplants but yes you are right better in an alternative package.

I love LS engines as you all know but i think its only a matter of time before alternatives have to be used for a number of reasons?

Moogle

257 posts

194 months

Thursday 21st July 2011
quotequote all
Storer said:
Is everyone mad.

These car's are about big V8 or V12 engines. Yes, they can be high revving or, if you must, turbo-ed/supercharged but not 4 cylinder or wk*rs.

The least that would sound acceptable would be a flat six (with turbos).

If you want to fit a 4 cyl or rotary please buy something else to fit it into.

Paul
You do realise the engine in the OP is a Mercedes V8 which can switch to four cylinders.... much like the GM V8 'L99' engine I mentioned, I am wondering why everyone keeps talking about 4 cylinder engines and rotary engines....

Personally my choice would either be, GM V8, Audi V8, Audi V10 or for something completely different VW/Audi W12.

crafty

2,291 posts

261 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
RXHeven said:
Here you go. He's since switched to a single turbo making over 1600 hp.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35Q9FhURrRs

Now imagine what this sounds like?
http://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=945021
mmm.... ND$67,000 = US$57,800... how about a group buy.

http://www.pulseperformance.co.nz/index.php?page=p...

and a vid

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWTULnclu6Y&fea...




ezakimak

1,871 posts

260 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
anyone know anything about the M117 or M119 engine as used in the Sauber C8 and C9 of the late 80s and also the SL500 ?


chuntington101

5,733 posts

260 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
crafty said:
Crafty, if you are going to build a quad rotor you may as well stick a turbo on there to! smile

Rusti Evo

537 posts

218 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
As a couple of you know I looked seriously at going rotary with my last car - however with the sensible hat on it just was not feasible.

The heat management issues with a 4 rotor twin turbo are vast. 2 huge intercoolers and 2 huge oil coolers plus all the radiant heat. The big oil coolers are needed because of the "oddness" of the rotary about a third of the engine cooling is done through the oil system. It was our belief that under the rear clip would be a hell.

A 3 rotor/big single seemed a better compromise and the prices from Carl Hayward were very reasonable. Amazingly he was prepared to offer me a 24 month warranty on a track day engine - now there is a guy you would have confidence with!!! All bespoke components, nothing Mazda.

There are also huge issues with silencing the N/A 4 rotor - nobody I spoke to had much confidence about getting down to trackday sound levels. Apparently the problem is a bit like a two stroke due the the exhaust ports. However, the joy of shrieking round Goodwood in that is almost unbearably attractive! Never say never...........

k wright

1,039 posts

283 months

Sunday 24th July 2011
quotequote all
Hmmm,

You are driving a car that gets 22 mpg VS one that gets 17 mpg over a distance of 5 thousand miles yearly. You do the math. We'll all be out blasting around in our V8 motored Ultimas.

V8Dom

3,547 posts

226 months

Sunday 24th July 2011
quotequote all
Gulf LS3 said:
I think a nice Audi V6 diesel with 2 big turbos would be fun 500-600 ftlbs, you could also use the Audi transaxle.
hehe And you thought I was all mad when I suggested Diesel 2 years ago..

biggrin

hedgefinder

3,418 posts

194 months

Sunday 24th July 2011
quotequote all
k wright said:
Hmmm,

You are driving a car that gets 22 mpg VS one that gets 17 mpg over a distance of 5 thousand miles yearly. You do the math. We'll all be out blasting around in our V8 motored Ultimas.
I completely agree... this thread makes no real sense. These cars arent about economy and very rarely do the milage that makes economy an issue anyway.
If you want a cheap toy then people should really buy a petrol engined r/c car.

JoelRP

129 posts

185 months

Sunday 24th July 2011
quotequote all
V8 from the atom 500?

macgtech

997 posts

183 months

Monday 25th July 2011
quotequote all
Storer said:
Is everyone mad.

These car's are about big V8 or V12 engines. Yes, they can be high revving or, if you must, turbo-ed/supercharged but not 4 cylinder or wk*rs.

The least that would sound acceptable would be a flat six (with turbos).

If you want to fit a 4 cyl or rotary please buy something else to fit it into.

Paul
+1

Gulf LS3

1,922 posts

228 months

Monday 25th July 2011
quotequote all
Its a self build car you can do what you want with it thats the beauty of ownership!!! Whether thats right or wrong is a different matter.

If someone wants to fit a pair of turbo charged bike engines then fair play, i think for some people its an engineering thing and doing whats already been done is not much fun for them eh Dave?

738 driver

1,202 posts

217 months

Monday 25th July 2011
quotequote all
Ambition is always a major factor..... to carefully combine with logic can sometimes be the challenging bit, especially when talking of petrol-head boys toys.
Keeping ones dreams realistic and having slightly improved results is usually a great combination for most of us.. however, harnessing those deeper sleepers can be a fair hurdle.

Still love big cams n carbs !!biggrin

Storer

5,024 posts

239 months

Monday 25th July 2011
quotequote all
I suppose it is the fact that the Ultima is a top handling car with a large (but some say not large enough) engine bay that can take many different engine/trans combinations if that is what you want to do.

My only engine/trans swap away from a large V8/Porsche trans would be a 3 litre Cosworth F1 engine and Hewland trans from the late 70s early 80s.

Now that would make an awesome track day car.

Paul