Z4M - Roadster or Coupe
Z4M - Roadster or Coupe
Author
Discussion

Neal H

Original Poster:

531 posts

225 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
Hi,

I'm thinking of a Z4M (undecided on Roadster or Coupe) as a daily driver with occassional track days. Does anyone have any feedback, known faults, must have options or upgrades etc...

Thanks,
Neal.

jontysafe

2,370 posts

209 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
Prosthetic hip was an option I missed on mine!

Legacywr

15,846 posts

219 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
Alpina Roadster S?

Cheburator mk2

3,232 posts

230 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
With the risk of incurring the wrath of roadster owners - the coup is the way to go...

Z4 Animal

6,015 posts

241 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
Cheburator mk2 said:
With the risk of incurring the wrath of roadster owners - the coup is the way to go...
+1 biggrin

Pistom

6,424 posts

190 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
This is such an argued subject. There are lots of cheap roadsters about, there are fewer coupes. Most think the coupe looks better.

There are loads of reasons for and against.

Go for what you want.


NiceCupOfTea

25,607 posts

282 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
They both look fabulous IMHO, but IIRC they started making the roadster much earlier so start much cheaper. I would love a 3.0...

mmm-five

12,396 posts

315 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
NiceCupOfTea said:
They both look fabulous IMHO, but IIRC they started making the roadster much earlier so start much cheaper. I would love a 3.0...
The did indeed start the Z4MR production a year or so earlier, but I've not seen one older than a 2006 registration so far.

NiceCupOfTea

25,607 posts

282 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
(Sorry I was thinking about the Z4 in general, not just the M-cars)

BuzyG

787 posts

242 months

Saturday 23rd July 2011
quotequote all
Of the Z4M's the R is the rarer car <1000 cars made. If you want to enjoy the view out by the R. If you want to look at the car from the out side, buy either. Both are very good value for money, for what they can do. If you are interested in upgrades look at threads by Beedub, here or on the Z4 forum. Either way buy one you won't regret it, it's a great car.

http://www.z4-forum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&am...

VvrooomM

157 posts

212 months

Saturday 23rd July 2011
quotequote all
BuzyG said:
Of the Z4M's the R is the rarer car <1000 cars made. If you want to enjoy the view out by the R. If you want to look at the car from the out side, buy either. Both are very good value for money, for what they can do. If you are interested in upgrades look at threads by Beedub, here or on the Z4 forum. Either way buy one you won't regret it, it's a great car.

http://www.z4-forum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&am...
I am not sure I agree with your facts, there were around 550 Z4M coupes registered and probably more Z4MR's

playalistic

2,270 posts

195 months

Saturday 23rd July 2011
quotequote all
Yep, that's patently wrong. There are/were less MCs than MRs.

Col 666

1,078 posts

244 months

Saturday 23rd July 2011
quotequote all
I ran a Z4M Roaster for a year until March this year.
Great car, very fun to drive with the traction off and makes a good noise! A bit cramped inside with very little storage, I think the coupe looks better but I found they were really claustrophic.
Servicing is expensive but fuel consumption isnt too bad I think I was averaging 26mpg.
As for options I would defo try and get one with Satnav and a decent sound system, mine had everything apart from heated seats which I missed as I had the roof down nearly all the time.


Pistom

6,424 posts

190 months

Saturday 23rd July 2011
quotequote all
As the OP said, he is thinking of the Z4 in general.

You have to decide what you want. Open top or tin top.

If you go for the Coupe you have a choice of 3.0Si or M Coupe.

If you go for the Si - go for the auto - it is a fantastic gearbox and suits the car. I can't imagine why anyone would go for the manual. It's just more work for a car which in real life is slower and less refind.

If you can stretch to an M do so. The MR and Mc must be the biggest bargains around at the moment. The only fly in the ointment being BMW servicing but that doesn't come around very often so is no great problem.

Independant servicing is cheaper if you can't stretch to the BMW stamp but will hit the resale value a lot.

Fuel consumption is amazingly good for the performance. You would have to drive like a lunatic everywhere to average 26mpg. Normal daily driving will see you over 30mpg if you have a mix of motorway speeds with town driving - longer distances will see you approaching 35 which is outstanding for a car like this.

Used prices dropped massivly from new but then have kept quite stable.

Just make sure you get a good one as don't forget - these are American "built" which loosly translates to some loose jawed North Carolina's bashing them together with a hammer and a bit of string.


BuzyG

787 posts

242 months

Saturday 23rd July 2011
quotequote all
VvrooomM said:
BuzyG said:
Of the Z4M's the R is the rarer car <1000 cars made. If you want to enjoy the view out by the R. If you want to look at the car from the out side, buy either. Both are very good value for money, for what they can do. If you are interested in upgrades look at threads by Beedub, here or on the Z4 forum. Either way buy one you won't regret it, it's a great car.

http://www.z4-forum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&am...
I am not sure I agree with your facts, there were around 550 Z4M coupes registered and probably more Z4MR's
Take a look at this link http://www.z4-forum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&am...
I though I'd read it some place. It was RHD that are <1000 made

916 RHD Roadsters
1054 RHD Coupes

Edited by BuzyG on Saturday 23 July 14:19

playalistic

2,270 posts

195 months

Saturday 23rd July 2011
quotequote all
Pistom said:
As the OP said, he is thinking of the Z4 in general.

You have to decide what you want. Open top or tin top.

If you go for the Coupe you have a choice of 3.0Si or M Coupe.

If you go for the Si - go for the auto - it is a fantastic gearbox and suits the car. I can't imagine why anyone would go for the manual. It's just more work for a car which in real life is slower and less refind.

If you can stretch to an M do so. The MR and Mc must be the biggest bargains around at the moment. The only fly in the ointment being BMW servicing but that doesn't come around very often so is no great problem.

Independant servicing is cheaper if you can't stretch to the BMW stamp but will hit the resale value a lot.

Fuel consumption is amazingly good for the performance. You would have to drive like a lunatic everywhere to average 26mpg. Normal daily driving will see you over 30mpg if you have a mix of motorway speeds with town driving - longer distances will see you approaching 35 which is outstanding for a car like this.

Used prices dropped massivly from new but then have kept quite stable.

Just make sure you get a good one as don't forget - these are American "built" which loosly translates to some loose jawed North Carolina's bashing them together with a hammer and a bit of string.
You're posting on PH asking why people prefer a manual to auto? redcard Plus your fuel economy figures... Are they for an M? If so, do you do most of your driving downhill with a tailwind? :O

mmm-five

12,396 posts

315 months

Saturday 23rd July 2011
quotequote all
playalistic said:
You're posting on PH asking why people prefer a manual to auto? redcard Plus your fuel economy figures... Are they for an M? If so, do you do most of your driving downhill with a tailwind? :O
I'd knock a good 5mpg off all those figures for an ///M.

My all time average is 26mpg, but it's 17-20mpg around town, and 30+mpg on a steady 70mph run (e.g. 29.6 mpg average on the drive from Liverpool to the 'Ring - 2 tankfuls).

D6GMB

187 posts

207 months

Saturday 23rd July 2011
quotequote all
Yep dont think he owns an M or he wouldnt be quoting figures like that.
Just been on a 4 day holiday down to the Lake District and i was getting 31 to the gallon on the M6 sitting at between 75 and 90 mph.
Was staying in Windermere and when visiting various places round about,which is mostly 30-40 mph driving with lots of gear changing and start
stops it was round about 19mpg.
Definately not the type of car you buy if you need to worry about mpg.But worth every penny when you open it up!!.

Pistom

6,424 posts

190 months

Saturday 23rd July 2011
quotequote all
D6GMB said:
Yep dont think he owns an M or he wouldnt be quoting figures like that.
Yep, I've got an M but I drive it properly, it's properly serviced and the tyre pressures are checked weekly - oh, and I'm talking trip computer figures here. Even so, I easily get well over 300 miles out of a tank though before I get all the dashes coming up on the range. That's on a daily commute. A fill up is about 50 litres.

On a trip up to Scotland at Easter, I got over 400 miles on a tank and that was with a lot of overtaking on the lovely A roads they have up there. On motorways though, I set the cruise control to a GPS indicated 77 and tend not to go over that much. Cruise control does help towards good economy.

OK, someone is going to say doing 77 in an M is not driving it properly but I leave my "M driving" when I'm on roads less likely to have unmarked plod and mobile scameras.

My previous Si was even more amazing. not far off my neighbours 2.0 Roadster.

Yes, the M is not a car to own if you need to look after the pennies but I can't think of a car with similar qualities that would be cheaper to run.

I've not had any repair bills yet but it's only servicing I would get done by BMW to get the nice dealer stamps.

ClintonB

5,060 posts

244 months

Sunday 24th July 2011
quotequote all
inkiboo said:
The Z4M Coupe will go down as one of the most beautiful cars ever made. The Roadster will not.
Simplicity is so correct yes


I regularly do (relative but invariably unsuccessful) man maths around the Z4M coop but have never even flinched around the wobbly roofed equivalent.