GTR under 900kg?
GTR under 900kg?
Author
Discussion

cooberpedy

Original Poster:

87 posts

177 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
I wonder, if anyone has managed to build a GTR under 900kg (full, excl. driver wink)?

Gulf LS3

1,922 posts

228 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
it may be possible but with 500+ bhp why does it matter unless you are racing?

SchimmS

258 posts

282 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
I don`t think that is possible, someone I know once built a "superlight" CanAm with no door handles, no interior, no heater, no windscreen, much lighter wheels (minus 28kg altoghether), no nothing (no TUV) and it weighed in at about 900kg full. Add at least 80-100kg for a GTR.

andygtt

8,345 posts

288 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
all the GTR's that I know have been weighed on corner weight scales were 1100kgs ish full of fluids... all were SBC cars although one was alloy block (and heaviest).

With an all alloy LS and some lighter wheels I recon under 1000kgs is easy to acheive... but another 100 would mean different engine and or box

If you fit an audi engine you could acheive it IMO as the box, clutch and engine all save quite a bot of weight.... worth noting that the Ultima 18inch wheels were massivelly heavier than the 17inch ones I had on my canam originally so potential to save here.

Gulf LS3

1,922 posts

228 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
960kg with full tanks with a LS3 and G50 at a recent IVA test. A fairly standard factory spec car. My ProCharged LSx GTR was 1095Kg

I dont think 900Kg is possible with any V8

eliot

11,988 posts

278 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
Gulf LS3 said:
960kg with full tanks with a LS3 and G50 at a recent IVA test. A fairly standard factory spec car. My ProCharged LSx GTR was 1095Kg

I dont think 900Kg is possible with any V8
You dont think you could find 60k of saving? Doesnt seem a huge amount to find.

Storer

5,024 posts

239 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
I am sure if you looked at every item you could get the weight down to 900kgs. You would also need to persuade the factory to build you a lightweight body. Delete a fuel tank, alloy radiator, 17" light weight wheels, stack dash, no aircon or heater, no dry sump or accusump, smaller capacity engine.

But what's the point. I know added lightness is good but if you wanted a light track car buy a Radical. As a road car with 500+hp an all up weight of a bit over 1000kgs is very light and staggeringly quick.

Paul


GTRene

21,059 posts

248 months

Friday 22nd July 2011
quotequote all
their website is updated the last time in 2007 so I do not know if they still work...but at the time the advertised with about 850kg.
they did change a lot though, I saw that car once on a show, but do not have that much real experience in Ultima's by building it or so.

but I think stuf what you see here is complte different









more on the website.

alfasteve

285 posts

284 months

Saturday 23rd July 2011
quotequote all
To get an ultima with 500 HP V8 under 900 Kg would be possible.
the RST V8 with 500 Hp weigth is 88 Kg fully dressed transmission is approx 45 Kg

GTRCLIVE

4,193 posts

307 months

Saturday 23rd July 2011
quotequote all
Gulf LS3 said:
960kg with full tanks with a LS3 and G50 at a recent IVA test. A fairly standard factory spec car. My ProCharged LSx GTR was 1095Kg

I dont think 900Kg is possible with any V8
If that's the Nottingham SVA Scales (Mainly used for testing 10 ton truck axle weights), I wouldn't trust it very much. The limits on that scale wasn't designed for a light wieght car....

My GTR was 1070 with some tools, a over night bag and 40 Litres of fuel measured at a Goodwood Track day with those nice corner wieght scales.... Old SBC BTY Ally heads G50/20

Gulf LS3

1,922 posts

228 months

Saturday 23rd July 2011
quotequote all
no Birmingham on the brake scales

papaulaborgne

39 posts

219 months

Sunday 24th July 2011
quotequote all
Gulf LS3 said:
960kg with full tanks with a LS3 and G50 at a recent IVA test. A fairly standard factory spec car. My ProCharged LSx GTR was 1095Kg

I dont think 900Kg is possible with any V8
Last time I paid a visit to Javier, he reckoned that his car should be very close to 900kg mark, but I guess that not many of us can afford a magnesium gearbox...

alfasteve

285 posts

284 months

Monday 25th July 2011
quotequote all
papaulaborgne said:
Last time I paid a visit to Javier, he reckoned that his car should be very close to 900kg mark, but I guess that not many of us can afford a magnesium gearbox...
Having a Magnesium Transmission casing saves some weigth but the internals are the same steel and are the most of the weigth A magnesium transmission will be I guess 10 - 20 Kg lighter at most

andygtt

8,345 posts

288 months

Tuesday 26th July 2011
quotequote all
Gulf LS3 said:
I dont think 900Kg is possible with any V8
just a matter of how much you want to hit the target.... single fuel tank (save 40kgs) , audi engine (saves 30kgs), audi box (saves 30kgs as no adapter either), lighter wheels (saves 20+kgs)

ta-da, car that is 900kgs wet... but will it be better than your LS3 car thats 100-150kgs heavier but 200bhp more powerful?



deadscoob

2,265 posts

284 months

Tuesday 26th July 2011
quotequote all
Wasn't the last Audi engined one Steve did sub 900kg all in?

It's probably not possible with a Chevy. 900kg or 1000kg, how many would actually notice the difference, or more importantly be able to exploit it?

Gulf LS3

1,922 posts

228 months

Tuesday 26th July 2011
quotequote all
Lewis Hamilton possibly but i doubt he is in the market for an Ultima

spatz

1,783 posts

210 months

Wednesday 27th July 2011
quotequote all
not sure if the audi engine is actually lighter than a ls7 which is only 178 kg.
My canam with sound deadening,satnav/radio and double panelling, heavy batteriy (yellowtop)
glass screen was 950kg empty fuel tanks. 900kg is no problem if you go for ceramic discs
and a lighter battery (LI ON) and an alloy radiator. That should be good for 50kg.

F.C.

3,899 posts

232 months

Wednesday 27th July 2011
quotequote all
spatz said:
not sure if the audi engine is actually lighter than a ls7 which is only 178 kg.
My canam with sound deadening,satnav/radio and double panelling, heavy batteriy (yellowtop)
glass screen was 950kg empty fuel tanks. 900kg is no problem if you go for ceramic discs
and a lighter battery (LI ON) and an alloy radiator. That should be good for 50kg.
I read that ceramic discs or rather the combined disc and caliper weight were actually heavier than metal.
Certainly what Mclaren claims for the MP4 12C.

GTRCLIVE

4,193 posts

307 months

Wednesday 27th July 2011
quotequote all
F.C. said:
I read that ceramic discs or rather the combined disc and caliper weight were actually heavier than metal.
Certainly what Mclaren claims for the MP4 12C.
Yeh I read that to, but don't believe that ....but then again anything the Clarksons involved in could easily be bks as it was in a copy of Top Gear Mag...

Moogle

257 posts

194 months

Wednesday 27th July 2011
quotequote all
F.C. said:
I read that ceramic discs or rather the combined disc and caliper weight were actually heavier than metal.
Certainly what Mclaren claims for the MP4 12C.
Personally I've been handed a Mercedes SL (I think?) REAR steel brake disk and was then handed what was definitely a Mercedes SLR FRONT brake disk. The larger SLR FRONT disk was significantly lighter than the smaller SL REAR disk.

I've always wondered what planet they were on suggesting otherwise but obviously there must be something we are missing, right?

The calipers can be used on either ceramic or steel disks can't they? You don't need specific calipers for ceramic disks do you? So the difference can't be there...

Maybe it's in the 'hats'?