First time buyer help please
First time buyer help please
Author
Discussion

brett84

Original Poster:

1,291 posts

184 months

Tuesday 26th July 2011
quotequote all
Hi All

I'm getting my first Chim as soon as possible, money burning a hole and i've been to see a few.

I've spent hours going through this and other forums but am still at a loss, can someone help please.

Ok, lots of Chims on the market at the minute, i'm only looking at the 7-8 bracket for now, i'm happy to spend in the future as work is going well and working on cars. But I can't be arsed to save any longer as i have the urge. Ok anyway. back to the point.

Is there much different in real world driving between the earlier 4.0 and later (with t5 box etc). As I can't seem to find the right 4.5 or 4.0HC in the price bracket i'm thinking get a nice 4.0 and play about with it once i'm used to it. Exhaust, cams, ecu etc (just like i did with a MK1 Escort I sold not too long ago).

I can't seem to find much comparison with SD1 and T5 boxes, apart from a longer 5th in the T5. Am i better off spending a little more on the later 4.0 or getting a better quality earlier? I am looking to keep the car so resale not too much of an issue

any experience appreciated.

Thanks

Brett

anonymous-user

85 months

Tuesday 26th July 2011
quotequote all
Never had experience of the SD1 box, but I believe the later T5 box is better/stronger.

I seem to recall that spares for the SD1 might not be as easy to come by.

brett84

Original Poster:

1,291 posts

184 months

Tuesday 26th July 2011
quotequote all
does anyone know if all 95 models had the t5 as i can't seem to find any definitive info on this. Also without going under to check visually, is there an easy way to tell?

Thanks


Jammy Dodger

2,449 posts

186 months

Tuesday 26th July 2011
quotequote all
Pre-T5 owners will be biased
T5 owners will be biased

There are so many different factors that make up a "good" TVR vs a "bad" one that you're best off test driving as many examples as you can until you find the peach that will stand out. It will happen to have either an SD1 or T5 box !

But but but:
You will find very quickly realise that the 4.0 is slower than you expected compared to modern cars, so if you're looking for the high performance to back up the reputation, you're better off either buying a 430/450/500 - and then you'll quickly realise that they're also slower than reputation led you to expect- or you can buy a £5000 project and spend £10k on proper power (300bhp), suspension and so on.

If you want a classic car to pose in that sounds the part, £8k is fine. If you want a high performance car that goes, handles and stops as it should, budget for at least £15k all in. If you want a modern Porsche beater then £20k Inc purchase price of £5k

Speaking from experience !

anonymous-user

85 months

Tuesday 26th July 2011
quotequote all
I think the T5 came in during 1995/1996.

I believe the reverse on the SD1 is to the left and forward. On the T5 it is to the right and back (opposite reverse).


theironduke

6,995 posts

219 months

Tuesday 26th July 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
My 1994 has a T5 box.

anonymous-user

85 months

Tuesday 26th July 2011
quotequote all
I have had a quick look on the web and yes, the T5 came in around 1994.

A bit earlier than I thought.

brett84

Original Poster:

1,291 posts

184 months

Tuesday 26th July 2011
quotequote all
Thanks All

I am looking for a project if i'm honest. I spent two years and about 10k on a £1000 MK1 escort and never actually drove it frown. So I dont mind doing bits as and when, i've been out in a 450 and couple 400HC and did like the extra, so i think a drive in some more may be in order. Mechanics i like doing, interior and bodywork i can't be arsed with though so i think its a case of seeing what i can get for the cash really.

I'm trawling through the many many many pages of peoples upgrades now from cams, suspension etc etc there is lots of info out there which is always good.

Alexdaredevilz

5,697 posts

210 months

Tuesday 26th July 2011
quotequote all
brett84 said:
Thanks All

I am looking for a project if i'm honest. I spent two years and about 10k on a £1000 MK1 escort and never actually drove it frown. So I dont mind doing bits as and when, i've been out in a 450 and couple 400HC and did like the extra, so i think a drive in some more may be in order. Mechanics i like doing, interior and bodywork i can't be arsed with though so i think its a case of seeing what i can get for the cash really.

I'm trawling through the many many many pages of peoples upgrades now from cams, suspension etc etc there is lots of info out there which is always good.
If thats the case buy any 4.0

Buy a 4.6 xbolted landrover engine and tweek it, then drop it in when its ready

Usual mods are

Trumpets/plenum/inlet manifold
Act induction
Cam
Heads
ECU

Do the above well and you should see you another 100bhp on top of a stock 4.0

brett84

Original Poster:

1,291 posts

184 months

Tuesday 26th July 2011
quotequote all
yeah i've been looking on various forums and there seem to be so many parts available for the land rover engines and i'm guessing it's not a massive job to swap over so that is my plan i think

Krautchimaera

164 posts

227 months

Wednesday 27th July 2011
quotequote all
I am just going that route of fitting a hotter engine and doing upgrades, like front brakes, dampers etc. If I were you, I would look for the right car, as said a 430,450 or 500 for a start.
Get it sorted ( there will always be some small niggles) fill up and enjoy the drive. I think it is much more fun sitting in the car than lying underneath to do some upgrades.

KENHIND

66 posts

229 months

Wednesday 27th July 2011
quotequote all
Brett,

I have a 4Ltr Chimaera 1994 I bought 4 years ago low milage,67.500. I bought it because it was the best one I looked at inc garage cars.
I was looking to poss sell car next year, due to work commitments I have done only 390 miles since major TrackvRoad service April 2009, well over £1000.00 to bring back Tvr history. Has been garaged since service
The car has just had a full 12.000mile service 1 week ago, £600.00, full mot with 1 advisory, slight play on steering column not excesive. Just ready to tax Aug.
My only issue at present, see posts, is the drivers side elec motor seems to have packed in, trying to resolve that issue. £166.00 off CLEVERTREVOR.
My intention was to use the car over what is left of the summer ha ha, but would sell before then for right offer, I would be looking for £6.500 which I think is a more than fair price for car.
The car has other mods but starting to sound like car salesman. I run a drag race mini. a hill climb COX GTM, also have Subaru Ipretza wrx, so I like my cars.
The reason for selling is to purchase a TR6 off a close friend, who will wait till the TVR is sold, if not this year, next year.
If you are interested please contact, if you have found another car keep in contact as I will always help with any issues you may have, if I can.

KENHIND

Chris71

21,549 posts

273 months

Wednesday 27th July 2011
quotequote all
I'd say buy on condition. They do vary a lot and not always as priced or described, but an early 4-litre in tip top condition with a few mods may well end up being nicer to drive and faster than a rough 4.5.

By the time you're up to seven or eight grand you should have a fairly good choice of the earlier models and the later small capacity variants. My pick, if you can find a good one, would be a 430.

The 430s are quite rare (which in some respects adds to the appeal) and the general consensus is that a healthy one produces almost as much power as a 450 in the real world, while being the crispest, most responsive engine of the lot. Depending on what you've driven before you might find some of the standard engines a bit lazy - not in the amount of power, but the relaxed, torquey manner in which it's delivered. The 430 is rather racier than the others are as standard and that in itself can be more satisfying if you like that sort of thing! Yet despite this beaut of an engine (because they're early examples and they're 'only' 4.3-litres the 430s...) the 430s are barely worth any more than a 4-litre of the same age.

But whichever you go for, drive (and inspect) lots before you make your decision and buy on condition. Oh, and keep a contingency fund handy. Most of the pub myths are just that, but it's not inconceivable that a perfectly healthy engine could go pop on the drive home!

ETA Just to pitch in with the gearbox debate, the one pre-T5 car I've driven definitely felt different, but it wasn't that much worse I wouldn't say. As with all aspects, I suspect a well cared for LT77 is better than a knackered T5.

Edited by Chris71 on Wednesday 27th July 12:54

Number 7

4,113 posts

293 months

Wednesday 27th July 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I'm not sure that I'd say the T5 is stronger - 5th gear breakages anyone? although that's more to do with the instalation than the box itself. IMHO the change is better (shorter, quicker) than the LT77. My LT77 has just been rebuilt, and no problems with parts at all.

jsr

1,155 posts

281 months

Wednesday 27th July 2011
quotequote all
My 1994 M reg 400 has the T5 gearbox. Also happens to be in the classifieds, but i'll leave you to find it!

As for the 400 being slow - dont believe it. 0-60 in an easily repeatable 5.2s and 1/4 mile in late 13s simply cannot be considered slow. What i think people mean however is that there are more cars around that can do those sort of figures compared to when the Chimaera was first introduced (Impreza's/Evo's/M3's etc). These still only form a small % of cars on the road, so you will still be considerably faster than most of the cars on any given journey.

You have to work the gears a bit more than the larger engine cars, but the 4 litre is generally happier to rev (mine goes to 6,250rpm) so these cars can be made to really fly! It is only really in 5th that it feel slow, but since 4th is good for 130ish, i only ever use 5th for motorway cruising.

Hope you find the car you want.

Chris71

21,549 posts

273 months

Wednesday 27th July 2011
quotequote all
jsr said:
These still only form a small % of cars on the road, so you will still be considerably faster than most of the cars on any given journey.
Plus the torque of a big V8 gives it real world pace that most naturally aspirated engines will struggle to match.

Although no standard Chimaera or Griff is a true supercar chase any more it is still a pretty rapid car. You're looking at about 260bhp/ton for a good 500, which is similar to a V8 Vantage or an M3 CSL.

Jammy Dodger

2,449 posts

186 months

Wednesday 27th July 2011
quotequote all
Chris71 said:
Plus the torque of a big V8 gives it real world pace that most naturally aspirated engines will struggle to match.

Although no standard Chimaera or Griff is a true supercar chase any more it is still a pretty rapid car. You're looking at about 260bhp/ton for a good 500, which is similar to a V8 Vantage or an M3 CSL.
fair enough - should've qualified my statement of "slow" with the fact that i've already enjoyed >260/tonne, so both the 430 and 500 I've owned felt slower than I'd expected.

So, modifications : 388bhp/tonne via supercharged 5.0 chim, that'll do - for now wink

Anyway - i think everyone is giving the same advice - model/gearbox are important, but not as important as condition. Drive every single example you can before you choose

Edited by Jammy Dodger on Wednesday 27th July 15:57

Chilliman

12,434 posts

192 months

Thursday 28th July 2011
quotequote all
jsr said:
My 1994 M reg 400 has the T5 gearbox. Also happens to be in the classifieds, but i'll leave you to find it!

As for the 400 being slow - dont believe it. 0-60 in an easily repeatable 5.2s and 1/4 mile in late 13s simply cannot be considered slow. What i think people mean however is that there are more cars around that can do those sort of figures compared to when the Chimaera was first introduced (Impreza's/Evo's/M3's etc). These still only form a small % of cars on the road, so you will still be considerably faster than most of the cars on any given journey.

You have to work the gears a bit more than the larger engine cars, but the 4 litre is generally happier to rev (mine goes to 6,250rpm) so these cars can be made to really fly! It is only really in 5th that it feel slow, but since 4th is good for 130ish, i only ever use 5th for motorway cruising.

Hope you find the car you want.
Don't disagree with the above. But.... BEWARE of the wolf in sheeps clothing.. Big (and some not so big) turbo diesels yikes That's right, turbo diesels. Even me, a driving God rolleyes has been caught out. 0 - 60 in a tad over 5 seconds is all very well, particularly if you're into the traffic lights GP, but out in the real dual carriageway and motorway world... they are there... and they are waiting... be afraid.... be very afraid...

Jammy Dodger

2,449 posts

186 months

Thursday 28th July 2011
quotequote all
Chilliman said:
Don't disagree with the above. But.... BEWARE of the wolf in sheeps clothing.. Big (and some not so big) turbo diesels yikes That's right, turbo diesels. Even me, a driving God rolleyes has been caught out. 0 - 60 in a tad over 5 seconds is all very well, particularly if you're into the traffic lights GP, but out in the real dual carriageway and motorway world... they are there... and they are waiting... be afraid.... be very afraid...
a merc E320Cdi (3 litre) kept up with my (at that point standard) 500 at 100+. My 500 was dynod at 245bhp at the wheels, so a strong one at that.

Chris71

21,549 posts

273 months

Thursday 28th July 2011
quotequote all
Jammy Dodger said:
Chris71 said:
Plus the torque of a big V8 gives it real world pace that most naturally aspirated engines will struggle to match.

Although no standard Chimaera or Griff is a true supercar chase any more it is still a pretty rapid car. You're looking at about 260bhp/ton for a good 500, which is similar to a V8 Vantage or an M3 CSL.
fair enough - should've qualified my statement of "slow" with the fact that i've already enjoyed >260/tonne, so both the 430 and 500 I've owned felt slower than I'd expected.
Wasn't disputing it - I totally agree. If you've driven seriously quick cars then a standard Chim doesn't feel especially fast in comparison. But there probably aren't that many first time TVR owners who are used to 260+ bhp/ton with no traction control and a 100dB V8 bellowing away. biggrin