Rent - Been told they have to pay a 27% increase
Rent - Been told they have to pay a 27% increase
Author
Discussion

RacingPete

Original Poster:

9,158 posts

228 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
Smart brains of PH...

I have a friend who has been renting a flat since March 2009 through the same agent and on this renewal they are saying the landlady wants a 27% increase in the rent as she has had the flat valued by another agent at that price. They are with a certain agency that I wouldn't trust one bit, and realise this could be a bit of playing around... but it is concerning.

They have renewed once before: First contract was 18 months, and second (the one they are in now) is 12 months. The increase last time was 3.1%.

The contact to ask if they wanted to renew the flat was 6 weeks from the end of the contract, to which they said yes they would.

Are there any legal grounds on increase in rent, notice time to renew etc. Obviously they don't want to be out on the street, in now what is only 5 weeks time.

I haven't seen the contract yet - but anything to look out for would be useful too - thanks in advance.

zaphod42

58,156 posts

179 months

Jobbo

13,636 posts

288 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
First link when googling 'increasing rent assured shorthold tenancy':

Clicky for pdf

LC926

891 posts

196 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
Without checking, i'm sure my agreement says the landlord has the right to increase by 5% at renewal.

SimonV8ster

12,926 posts

252 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
In commercial leases theres normally soemthing in there stating that rent can only go up by a certain amount max (say 5%) at renewal. Not sure about domestic leases but worth looking at what their last rental agreemnet was.

Jobbo

13,636 posts

288 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
SimonV8ster said:
In commercial leases theres normally soemthing in there stating that rent can only go up by a certain amount max (say 5%) at renewal.
That's something I have *never* seen in a commercial lease and I've been dealing with them (in some numbers, across a wide range of properties) for nearly 14 years.

SimonV8ster

12,926 posts

252 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
Oh OK. Maybe its 'can only go up and not down at renewal' then ?!

Jobbo

13,636 posts

288 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
I've certainly seen that in all of them (where the term has been long enough to have a rent review, anyway)! Once received some heads of terms which specified 'upwards or downwards review' and I was so surprised I rang the client straight away. It was a mistake, should have been upwards only...

RacingPete

Original Poster:

9,158 posts

228 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
Thank you for the above links... should have googled really, but then people here are usually better smile

So the things I have gathered, so correct me if I'm wrong:

  • The tenant has yet to be given notice, so even though the fixed-term contract expires on 13th September they are still entitled to live in the place until 2 months after they are given written notice.
  • They can increase the rent to whatever they like - though if they make it above the market average you can apply to a board to review
  • Also, the increase in rent will break the figure of £25,000 / year and thus change the rental agreement from an Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreement (AST) to a Standard Tenancy Contract (STC)
Further questions:
  • Does the written notice need to be by post, or can it be by email?
  • What benefits and disadvantages do a AST have against a STC?

E36GUY

5,906 posts

242 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
Rents are definitely going up everywhere due a general shortage of available property so the current valuation by the landlord may well be accurate in the current market and, as the landlord, they can charge what they like. Whether they achieve it or not is another matter.

My opinion would be for them to say they don't agree to the rise and see if they get served notice. As a private tenant there is always a risk you could be served notice and be out of a home in 1-2 months so this shouldn't be a surprise but it's certainly a nuisance if it's not your wish to move for sure!

As a landlord whose tenant has just re-signed for a third year, I would prefer to keep a happy tenant paying the same rent rather than go through the risk of having the property empty for a time while you chase a little more money - then paying out another fee to the letting agent as I would warrant all that would suck up any extra money earned.

To put another possibility out there....how did your mates' rent compare to the rest of the market when they moved in? Was it cheaper than everywhere else in which case it's now being brought in line with the market and therefore perhaps they've had a good deal for the time up to now?

nickd01

636 posts

239 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
RacingPete said:
  • Also, the increase in rent will break the figure of £25,000 / year and thus change the rental agreement from an Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreement (AST) to a Standard Tenancy Contract (STC)
I thought this went up to £100k per year back in 2010? I'm certainly over that limit and on an AST with protected deposit.

RacingPete

Original Poster:

9,158 posts

228 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
nickd01 said:
RacingPete said:
  • Also, the increase in rent will break the figure of £25,000 / year and thus change the rental agreement from an Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreement (AST) to a Standard Tenancy Contract (STC)
I thought this went up to £100k per year back in 2010? I'm certainly over that limit and on an AST with protected deposit.
You are probably correct, but what I read was that the deposit scheme was extended for over £25,000 to £100,000, but didn't read anything on the change of rental agreements.

RacingPete

Original Poster:

9,158 posts

228 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
E36GUY said:
To put another possibility out there....how did your mates' rent compare to the rest of the market when they moved in? Was it cheaper than everywhere else in which case it's now being brought in line with the market and therefore perhaps they've had a good deal for the time up to now?
It was probably on the bottom side of the market at the time, but then I had a look at rentals at lunch and they vary so much for a 2 bed flat in London in a range of £300/week, so it is pretty pot luck.

Shame you can't look up rent the same as sold house prices!

0a

24,099 posts

218 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
Out of interest our landlord served notice on us on day one of the contract for 12 months down the line, if we failed to contact them (they are rubbish regarding contact) what would have happened?

Our rent went up by 10% this year, but then it hasn't gone up for 5 years so fair enough in my opinion.

dudleybloke

20,553 posts

210 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
if the landlord gets greedy move out and take the wires and copper pipes with you! smile

if the landlady takes the piss so should they!

E36GUY

5,906 posts

242 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
RacingPete said:
You are probably correct, but what I read was that the deposit scheme was extended for over £25,000 to £100,000, but didn't read anything on the change of rental agreements.
Private tenancies that are £25-100K can now be covered by an AST.

offshorematt2

867 posts

240 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
dudleybloke said:
if the landlord gets greedy move out and take the wires and copper pipes with you! smile

if the landlady takes the piss so should they!
Interesting. So if the landlord maximises the return on his investment in line presumably with current market rates, then you would suggest robbing from him and in the process trashing his house?

Appreciate the smiley face (hopefully) indicates you're joking(?), but seriously for a second, how is the landlord 'taking the piss'. From the OP's own admission, the rent was at the lower end of the range when they moved in and is now being reset against a rising market. Unfortunate for the tenant perhaps, but should the landlord just forget about his investment and hold the rent as is until the tenants decide at some stage to move on (which they probably won't do as they are paying 30% below market rate apparently...)?

dudleybloke

20,553 posts

210 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
offshorematt2 said:
dudleybloke said:
if the landlord gets greedy move out and take the wires and copper pipes with you! smile

if the landlady takes the piss so should they!
Interesting. So if the landlord maximises the return on his investment in line presumably with current market rates, then you would suggest robbing from him and in the process trashing his house?

Appreciate the smiley face (hopefully) indicates you're joking(?), but seriously for a second, how is the landlord 'taking the piss'. From the OP's own admission, the rent was at the lower end of the range when they moved in and is now being reset against a rising market. Unfortunate for the tenant perhaps, but should the landlord just forget about his investment and hold the rent as is until the tenants decide at some stage to move on (which they probably won't do as they are paying 30% below market rate apparently...)?
theres maximising profits and theres taking the piss!

i bet the landlord would be furious if the bank put the mortgage payment up by 30% suddenly.

Kermit power

29,622 posts

237 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
Just out of interest, why on earth would anyone even contemplate paying out over £25k pa in rent??? How could it not be better to buy something?

lengster

215 posts

183 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
And if they did would careless or offer to pay him the extra 30%? But the climate favours him at the moment so hes out of order eh? Put your money were your mouth is and buy a few properties with your hard earned and then come back and comment