S2000 Insurance: How do people manage it?
S2000 Insurance: How do people manage it?
Author
Discussion

mx5tom

Original Poster:

573 posts

203 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
I've been considering changing my car and an S2000 seems like a great candidate: love the engine, the looks, noise, seems like something that can be left outside and used daily (as opposed to say, a Chimaera)... But insurance? No chance.

Now, ok, I'm 21 (22 when insurance would start, and what I used for the quotes) and I'm not expecting it to be 'cheap', but I see other people (who seem to be) my age driving them around and I have to wonder... How?

For comparison, quotes for other cars with the same details:
MX5 (Current car, albeit didn't declare mods for this example quote): £900
RX8 PZ: £1100
350Z: £1000 (Coupe. The roadster comes in at £2200 wobble)
Boxster (986 2.7): £1400 - (986 3.2S) £1800
BMW Z4M: £1800

An S2000? £2300. Now, ok, it's a fairly powerful car with reputation for going backwards. But it seems absolutely nuts that it's that much more to insure than those other cars I've mentioned which in many cases, are either as quick or quicker than the S.

It's a bit gutting really. It seems like a perfect car for me in every other respect, but the insurance means it's a no go. Does anyone here around my age own one? If so, do you mind saying how much you pay for insurance and who with?

FYI: Those quotes were with Admiral multi-Car with several older named drivers. I've tried several specialists, many of which are listed on the S2Ki website and all have been severely un-competitive. (The cheapest being £3.5k, the most well over £4k and was also treated to the advice of "get a 3 series for a few years first")

Patrick Bateman

13,176 posts

204 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
A friend of mine has one, he's 22/23 not sure how much he pays, think it could be on a multicar policy.

I take it you've tried adding parents to the policy as additional drivers?

With Admiral it made it about £200 cheaper for me on my car.

Nevermind, see your edit already has that covered.

Searider

1,005 posts

285 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
mx5tom said:
with reputation for going backwards
If that's reflected in the claim statistics - there's your answer.

Chas88

630 posts

196 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
I looked at an S2000 at 21 but insurance meant I ended up with an MX-5 as my daily drive. I've since bought a Chimaera to replace the MX-5 and even that is cheaper to insure than an S2000.

GroundEffect

13,864 posts

186 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
S2000 at 23 (i.e. me now) would be £830pa fully comp.


Gizmo!

18,150 posts

239 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
I looked at similar stuff a while back. Cane to the same conclusion: the S2K must go backwards a lot.

The Z3M is comparatively piss-easy to insure, however.

mx5tom

Original Poster:

573 posts

203 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
Absolutely. I have considered a Chim, but it would live outside and be a daily drive. Whilst I think they're fantastic, I find the idea of a screaming IL4 more appealing than the lazy V8 of the TVR.

As I've said, they do have a bad reputation, both for being crashed and stolen, which I'm sure is reflected in the statistics. Whilst I accept they will be costlier to insure than the other cars I mentioned, it's the huge margin that gets me. Surely, no sane person would pay £2k+ for insurance when there are those other cars are available.

So, either there are a handful of insane people out there, or they're getting cheap insurance. tongue out I'm just trying to find out which it is.

mx5tom

Original Poster:

573 posts

203 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
GroundEffect said:
S2000 at 23 (i.e. me now) would be £830pa fully comp.
Who was that with? That's fantastic redface

GroundEffect

13,864 posts

186 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
mx5tom said:
Who was that with? That's fantastic redface
Admiral. I'm in a very low risk area (west of Edinburgh) so basically no car costs over £1k to insure (I got a quote for a 360 Modena for £995).


hondafanatic

4,969 posts

231 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
What's the first part of your post code and how much mileage are you doing? I find those affect insurance a lot.

We have the the S2000 and FD2 on multicar policy. The more expensive to replace, imported group 20 FD2 costs £440. The S2000 £770. The S2000 is in my wife's name...it's always been a lot more to insure.

As has already been mentioned, the crash stats are probably right up with there with the worst (or is it best?)

mx5tom

Original Poster:

573 posts

203 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
Wow that's pretty good and surprising. I thought being in Aberystwyth (a very low risk area, apparently) would show pretty good results, apparently not. smile It's not down to being a student, either: Changing job title from student to various other things knocks the premium down by £100~.

mx5tom

Original Poster:

573 posts

203 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
hondafanatic said:
What's the first part of your post code and how much mileage are you doing? I find those affect insurance a lot.

We have the the S2000 and FD2 on multicar policy. The more expensive to replace, imported group 20 FD2 costs £440. The S2000 £770. The S2000 is in my wife's name...it's always been a lot more to insure.

As has already been mentioned, the crash stats are probably right up with there with the worst (or is it best?)
SY23 - Aberystwyth.

All of those quotes are for 10k mileage. In reality I probably do a lot less, but for peace of mind should I do more.

hondafanatic

4,969 posts

231 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
mx5tom said:
hondafanatic said:
What's the first part of your post code and how much mileage are you doing? I find those affect insurance a lot.

We have the the S2000 and FD2 on multicar policy. The more expensive to replace, imported group 20 FD2 costs £440. The S2000 £770. The S2000 is in my wife's name...it's always been a lot more to insure.

As has already been mentioned, the crash stats are probably right up with there with the worst (or is it best?)
SY23 - Aberystwyth.

All of those quotes are for 10k mileage. In reality I probably do a lot less, but for peace of mind should I do more.
In that case, I reckon it's the typical, young male/fast car stats that are working against you.


Durzel

12,999 posts

198 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
From having owned an S2000 the OEM Bridgestones are imo suicidal so if that is indeed reflected in the claims I wouldn't be that surprised that it's a bit higher than the competition.

Get a quote for an "S2000 GT" (the only difference between this model and a non-GT is the optional hardtop, both GT and non-GT are just recognised as "S2000" on logbooks), you might be surprised at the difference.

bazking69

8,620 posts

220 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
Claim stats and history. For the same reason it works out cheaper, for me anyway having done quotes, to insure an Audi S4 than a Civic Type R EP3.

johnpeat

5,329 posts

295 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
S2000s are rare and, generally, that tends to REDUCE costs because it means they're owned by enthusiasts (who look after them) instead of idiots (who crash them)...

Clearly there's some actuarial data working against the car here tho - quite simply, they've been nicked or stacked a lot and/or there are expensive parts easily damaged in accidents and/or parts are expensive or it takes forever to get them.

Are you garaging the car and/or using for Class 1 (travelling to more than 1 place of work)?? Non-garaged convertibles tend to attact massive quotes (see the 370Z Roadster) as do Class 1 policies (because it implies you'll be parking the car in lots of different places which tends to include public car parks, hotel car parks etc. etc.).

Someone I know was 99% of the way to buying one and at the last moment changed his mind and got a Z3 instead - it may well have been the insurance which put him off (the car he was looking at was an import too) - I'll ask him next time I see him...

mx5tom

Original Poster:

573 posts

203 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
Car will be kept on the street. I haven't tried 'Drive' (as I don't have one) but I tried saying it would be kept in a garage, and the price went up around £200. I also tried adding a tracker, and the insurance went up by £100. I'm going to try the GT/Non-GT route now and see what I get.

mx5tom

Original Poster:

573 posts

203 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
GT / Non-GT quotes:

2006 GT: £2372
2006 Non-GT: £2372

2001 Non-GT: £2115
2001 GT: £2115


Seems you were right at being surprised by the difference between the GT/Convertible. There's none. :P

ETA: I've tried different addresses, age of car, how long I've owned the car (purely to see if it decreases considerably after owning it a year) and made very little difference. The only change make a considerable difference is the excess. Changing it from £250 to £1000 lowers it to a £1400 premium, however this is an unrealistic option.

I also forgot to mention I have 3 points which probably makes a fair bit of difference too...


Edited by mx5tom on Sunday 14th August 23:27

Laughingman21

590 posts

241 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
Try Chris Knott Insurance. If you're a member of the S2000 owners club you get a discount and i found they were much cheaper than anyone else when I was shopping around.

Patrick Bateman

13,176 posts

204 months

Sunday 14th August 2011
quotequote all
If I remember correctly they wouldn't do me a quote, cant remember if it was because my car was modified or because I was under 25 though.