Lexus LFA - better than a Ferrari GTO
Lexus LFA - better than a Ferrari GTO
Author
Discussion

toppstuff

Original Poster:

13,698 posts

277 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
It is surprising that the Lexus LFA does not seem to be on the radar of car enthusiasts.

I think it is worth another look.

Consider this: EVO remains a highly regarded journal and while it is not perfect and it can take itself too seriously, it is fair to say that EVO is staffed by people who are, well, "like minded" when it comes to cars.

And EVO gets to drive all the cars most of us only dream of.

In this months edition , they compare the Lexus LFA to the Ferrari GTO and conclude : "Lexus beats Ferrari".

Even allowing for hyperbole and the natural desire of a journalist to look for a good headline, this is still very interesting stuff.

The Lexus LFA is a car no-one seems to talk about yet, here it is, standing proud among the hyper cars, right where it should be.

I am pleased about this. The car is a technical tour de force, an amazing piece of technology developed by engineers who really care. It is single minded, with a degree of dedication to getting things right that reminds me of McLaren and the F1.

The LFA deserves a lot more recognition than it is getting.

I count myself as an admirer.


ikarl

4,058 posts

229 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
I love the look of that thing!

CaptainSensib1e

1,528 posts

251 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
I agree its a great car but its so stupidaly expensive (not that I could afford one if it was half the price) I feel quite apathetic towards it.

toppstuff

Original Poster:

13,698 posts

277 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
CaptainSensib1e said:
I agree its a great car but its so stupidaly expensive (not that I could afford one if it was half the price) I feel quite apathetic towards it.
It is hyper-car expensive. More than an Aventedor and about the same price as a Ferrari 599 GTO. It is a shame that the lack of a brand like Ferrari seems to stand in the way of the car being taken seriously. It is good that EVO has rectified this. Better than a 599 GTO eh, who would have though it?!!

LotusOmega375D

9,364 posts

183 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
Are they still making that Celica?

BarnatosGhost

34,153 posts

283 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
The car is wonderful.

I think the styling is deliberately restrained so that when a Lexus 911 rival is launched in a couple of years it'll look A LOT like this, and benefit hugely from the LFA as a halo.

The LFA is a part of a much bigger strategy. It wasn't allowed to be simply as exciting as possible. Its purpose is to stretch Lexus' brand-breadth while staying in-touch with 'normality', and so create headroom for a credible £70k Lexus sportscar.

Which I'm sure will be very special indeed. Like an R8 without the tt-factor.

ZOLLAR

19,920 posts

203 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
I agree OP, the LFA doesn't get the attention it should.
It looks fantastic.

Nagra

4,713 posts

214 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
BarnatosGhost said:
The car is wonderful.

...Like an R8 without the tt-factor.
Care to explain? confused

will_

6,035 posts

233 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
I had a good look around the Nurburgring edition at Goodwood this year. The LCD dash is fanstatic.

Not sure I'd "lust" after one though, particularly as the bonnet looks like it hasn't been closed properly.

Chicane-UK

3,861 posts

215 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
http://www.autoblog.com/2011/02/18/lexus-lfa-ship-...

Read this a while back and just remembered it now, that it might interest some folks!

Audi 525i

1,250 posts

182 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
Looking at the Evo video, the Lexus is quite bit slower than the Ferrari. SPEED MATTERS

Robbo101

180 posts

186 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
Perhaps this is a case of the GTO not living up to its illustrious badge, rather than the Lexus being a world beater ? (& before anyone comments, no I have never driven/been a passenger in either & unless my numbers come up this week/I spontaneously develop the ability to kick a bag of air in a straight line, Im not likely to either).

0A

24,138 posts

224 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
For that money there are a lot of cars i'd rather have though (as in multiple cars!)

Gad-Westy

16,585 posts

243 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
Much as I admire it I can't help but think it looks like a replacement for the Supra, not a £300k hypercar.

The engine note does give me wood though smile

anonymous-user

84 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
Nagra said:
BarnatosGhost said:
The car is wonderful.

...Like an R8 without the tt-factor.
Care to explain? confused
I don't think it's anything like an R8. It is much better.
But he probably means it is usually driven by erm 'promising footballers' who enjoy a good mirror.

lauda

4,431 posts

237 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
CaptainSensib1e said:
I agree its a great car but its so stupidaly expensive (not that I could afford one if it was half the price) I feel quite apathetic towards it.
Is it really that stupidly expensive though? The GTO that evo tested it against was the thick end of £340k compared to £352k for the LFA. When you look at how bespoke the LFA is compared to the GTO (which is just a tarted up version of a standard production car), I would say that the LFA looks like a comparative bargain. With emphasis on the word 'comparative'.

AV12

5,346 posts

238 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
Completely agree. I really like the LFA. I was never as bothered as some by the price tag, because, I feel cars like this should be expensive and exclusive enough to ensure legendary status (something like the Countach, 288 and 959 were).

I think it looks great; looks technical, exudes precision. The more interpretations of the supercar/hypercar should be the better!

A great hypercar.The noise, oh that noise!

Tokoloshe

376 posts

208 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
It still looks cheap IMO, something about the Jap designs that dont seem to carry the Hypercar/Supercar look of their counterparts, they look like suped up versions of something more ordinary. Reminds me of the newer Intergra when Mugen get hold of it and put massive bits all over it that dont really seem to fit.

Too much of it looks like add ons, and as a result a lot of people wouldnt pay the massive asking price, regardless of whether it is considered "better" than a GTO by some (how do they clarify it as being better? Faster? more agile? better looking?)

It looks nice enough as a Japanese sports car, but not when you see it next to it's Italian competitors, and that's before you bring the badge into it.

Im not a fan, I appreciate the technology and attention to detail, but I would never desire one as a car, it's more like a modified white good. Now if it could wash your clothes and make toast...

Edited by Tokoloshe on Friday 19th August 15:51

NAS

2,588 posts

261 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
lauda said:
CaptainSensib1e said:
I agree its a great car but its so stupidaly expensive (not that I could afford one if it was half the price) I feel quite apathetic towards it.
Is it really that stupidly expensive though? The GTO that evo tested it against was the thick end of £340k compared to £352k for the LFA. When you look at how bespoke the LFA is compared to the GTO (which is just a tarted up version of a standard production car), I would say that the LFA looks like a comparative bargain. With emphasis on the word 'comparative'.
Completely agree. Willing to bet the engineering on the LFA is miles ahead of that of the GTO.

CraigVmax

12,248 posts

312 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
well i've been in it at full attack mode and it sounds incredible, is like being inside a transformer, the brakes are phenomenal. BUT, in terms of speed, it wouldnt see where a GTO went over 140