Clio Williams
Author
Discussion

snotrag

Original Poster:

15,466 posts

233 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
Tonights musings - contemplating changing from my recently bought 2nd MX5.

I fancy perhaps something with a bit of "Zing". Ideally with more money I'd have an Alfa Gtv, but realistically I'll be just swapping, so does a Clio Wily for 2-2.5k sound like a good buy? I'd like something a bit special, and these seem a good buy whole remaining quite sensible at the moment while I can't afford to gamble on something more exotic.

What's the engine like? I really miss a car with a characterful engine. Do they sound good for a 4cyl?

What are spares like? Economy?

Sound like a fun buy for this kind of money?

Plug550

1,106 posts

237 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
Funny you should ask, I just bought my son one today! A 1 owner car for his 21st. I know, I spoil the boy smile
Ideal classic car that is reasonable on the insurance, and fun. Can't go wrong.

DanGPR

991 posts

193 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
Whilst I don't have much input about the Williams, why would you prefer one over a Clio 172, which will be faster/newer/more reliable/more upgradable/the list goes on?

Jw Vw

4,901 posts

185 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
Should be a hoot to drive, great handling I believe. £2-2.5k should get you a good example.

Mastodon2

14,142 posts

187 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
DanGPR said:
Whilst I don't have much input about the Williams, why would you prefer one over a Clio 172, which will be faster/newer/more reliable/more upgradable/the list goes on?
I might go out on a limb here and say that while the 172 might be quicker, it will not have anywhere near as much character or be anything close to the experience that having a Williams would be. Of course, if you don't "get" the Williams, then the 172 or 182 is a better car, sure.

Silent1

19,761 posts

257 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
DanGPR said:
Whilst I don't have much input about the Williams, why would you prefer one over a Clio 172, which will be faster/newer/more reliable/more upgradable/the list goes on?
Williams = looked after by enthusiasts
172 = owned by chavs

snotrag

Original Poster:

15,466 posts

233 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
Exactly - a 172 will be barely faster, common, less interesting and characterful, as mastodon says.

Tactility and the pleasure of owning is far more important than seconds to 60.

StottyZr

6,860 posts

185 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
I'd go for a williams. Last night I had the oppertunity to drive a Mk1 Clio 1.8 16v. It was lowered to an inch of its life, induction kit and scorpion exhaust and I wasn't expecting much. But they pull very well through the gears, and with the car being so low with wide tyres it stuck like you wouldn't believe. Its a very raw driving experiance, sitting so low, no power steering, no abs. Saying that, to the guy who bought his son one for his 21st, you do realise its pretty much a death trap for a young lad? It has the ability to get to dangerous speeds and I found on the limit it was quite twitchy especially under breaking. It wouldn't be too difficult to wrap one around a tree and they ain't exactly Euro N-cap 5 star cars now are they. I hope he's a sensible lad.

nottyash

4,671 posts

217 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
I owned a 16v back in the day, it was fantastic to drive 137bhp where as the Williams was 150bhp.
It took a trip to the dealer on a fornightly basis, all warranty work with niggly electric faults and sensors.
As good as they are to drive I wouldnt want to own one 16 years later.

soad

34,280 posts

198 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
Definitely looks interesting, cool and will stand out too.
I found myself lusting after one on a few occasions.

F1GTRUeno

6,512 posts

240 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
Silent1 said:
Williams = looked after by enthusiasts
172 = owned by chavs
Judging off the scarcity of good Williams' nowadays, I'd say they're both owned by chavs.

s m

24,105 posts

225 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
StottyZr said:
I'd go for a williams. Last night I had the oppertunity to drive a Mk1 Clio 1.8 16v. It was lowered to an inch of its life, induction kit and scorpion exhaust and I wasn't expecting much. But they pull very well through the gears, and with the car being so low with wide tyres it stuck like you wouldn't believe. Its a very raw driving experiance, sitting so low, no power steering, no abs. Saying that, to the guy who bought his son one for his 21st, you do realise its pretty much a death trap for a young lad?
Good grief - looking back at some of the cars I ( and my friends ) drove round when we were 21 and under, it's amazing we all survived eek

stick100

7,017 posts

190 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
we.ve got a customer with one they do go well and they will be come collecters cars one day
go for the willaims

gaunty

132 posts

205 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
Hello Mate

I had a williams and ran it for a few years. They are a fantastic little car not a whole lot slower in a straight line than a 172. But it really comes into its own in the twists it just sticks to the road great car. The parts can be abit pricey there is not alot of room in the engine bay at all so the cambelt change cost's a few pound. Mine had a 197 thousand miles on the clock before i sold it and it was still going strong. If you need any more info P'm Me mate and i will try and answer all questions.

Cheers James

nottyash

4,671 posts

217 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
StottyZr said:
I'd go for a williams. Last night I had the oppertunity to drive a Mk1 Clio 1.8 16v. It was lowered to an inch of its life, induction kit and scorpion exhaust and I wasn't expecting much. But they pull very well through the gears, and with the car being so low with wide tyres it stuck like you wouldn't believe. Its a very raw driving experiance, sitting so low, no power steering, no abs. Saying that, to the guy who bought his son one for his 21st, you do realise its pretty much a death trap for a young lad? It has the ability to get to dangerous speeds and I found on the limit it was quite twitchy especially under breaking. It wouldn't be too difficult to wrap one around a tree and they ain't exactly Euro N-cap 5 star cars now are they. I hope he's a sensible lad.
Rubbish. Not all 21 year olds are idiots who need to be wrapped in cotton wool.
I had a Mitsubishi Starion Turbo when I was 19/20, and it was chipped to 240BHP. it was only 3 years old, and i loved it. i learned quite a bit from a powerful rear drive coupe at a young age.
My 16v Clio had ABS and power steering, your talking about a modified chavved up car. Big bore exhausts and lowered suspension just ruin the car IMO.

Urban Sports

11,321 posts

225 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
Plug550 said:
Can't go wrong.
Except it probably will, regularly.

attym3

7,259 posts

190 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
A good unmolested series one Williams Clio is a car that is on the brink of really shooting up in value I think. Real piston/petrolheads car IMO.

Mark

jomcvelia

314 posts

188 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
Had one when they first came out, absolutely a hoot of a drive. Of all the cars i have owned the Williams would be near the top of my list.

TROOPER88

1,784 posts

201 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
Can rust very badly around the arches and inside the boot lid.

Had a William 1 (no. 112) which was immaculate (when I sold it circa 3 years ago).
Just trying to do a basic service is a pain to to lack of room in the engine bay; the oil filter can be a nightmare to loosen.

ShampooEfficient

4,278 posts

233 months

Sunday 28th August 2011
quotequote all
s m said:
StottyZr said:
I'd go for a williams. Last night I had the oppertunity to drive a Mk1 Clio 1.8 16v. It was lowered to an inch of its life, induction kit and scorpion exhaust and I wasn't expecting much. But they pull very well through the gears, and with the car being so low with wide tyres it stuck like you wouldn't believe. Its a very raw driving experiance, sitting so low, no power steering, no abs. Saying that, to the guy who bought his son one for his 21st, you do realise its pretty much a death trap for a young lad?
Good grief - looking back at some of the cars I ( and my friends ) drove round when we were 21 and under, it's amazing we all survived eek
>had a RWD V6 at 19<
>dies six times<