Support the Aberdeen bypass
Support the Aberdeen bypass
Author
Discussion

thinfourth2

Original Poster:

32,414 posts

234 months

Monday 29th August 2011
quotequote all
If you are sick of the NIMBYs trying to force you to sit in the dyce traffic then see below

Charles Innes (of Innes Associates)has instigated a petition to try to stop Roadsense going to further appeal. We know that the vast majority of members of the Chamber support the AWPR. You can support the petition at:
http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/roadsense-stop...

Charles writes:
“I have instigated this petition to try and demonstrate to the objectors that this ridiculous situation has gone on long enough and it is time for them to back down and let us get on with building the much-needed route. Like many other small business owners and concerned citizens, I am angry and frustrated by the continual delays to a major piece of infrastructure that will unlock significant road and public transport improvements. It was time for me to take a stand and I hope many others will join me.”

TFatC

400 posts

282 months

Monday 29th August 2011
quotequote all
Signed

Ritchie335is

2,152 posts

232 months

Monday 29th August 2011
quotequote all
Signed.

Stylus

154 posts

203 months

Monday 29th August 2011
quotequote all
Signed.

jshell

12,106 posts

235 months

Monday 29th August 2011
quotequote all
I would, but the 'rediculous' spelling mistake makes it look like the work of an amateur. frown

Lefty

21,503 posts

232 months

Monday 29th August 2011
quotequote all
jshell said:
I would, but the 'rediculous' spelling mistake makes it look like the work of an amateur. frown
I agree but signed it anyway with a comment about the shpeeling

downthepub

1,429 posts

236 months

Monday 29th August 2011
quotequote all
Done.

thinfourth2

Original Poster:

32,414 posts

234 months

Monday 29th August 2011
quotequote all
jshell said:
I would, but the 'rediculous' spelling mistake makes it look like the work of an amateur. frown
Oh get over yourself and sign it

jshell

12,106 posts

235 months

Monday 29th August 2011
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
jshell said:
I would, but the 'rediculous' spelling mistake makes it look like the work of an amateur. frown
Oh get over yourself and sign it
smile

Scottish Greg

285 posts

205 months

Tuesday 30th August 2011
quotequote all
Signed

Stylus

154 posts

203 months

Tuesday 30th August 2011
quotequote all
Now reported on the BBC which should see numbers rise;

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-north-east-o...


Overseas

1,653 posts

267 months

Tuesday 30th August 2011
quotequote all
Signed.

Dargie

637 posts

212 months

Tuesday 30th August 2011
quotequote all
Signed

Guffy

2,372 posts

295 months

Tuesday 30th August 2011
quotequote all
Signed.


Allandwf

1,773 posts

225 months

Tuesday 30th August 2011
quotequote all
Done.

boardinscotland

1,234 posts

226 months

Tuesday 30th August 2011
quotequote all
Done too!

GruntyDC5

388 posts

196 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
Signed

Scottish Greg

285 posts

205 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
Canna believe roadsense are appealing again! I truely hope they do not get cost protection and stop this nonsense.

RescueYing

277 posts

194 months

Wednesday 31st August 2011
quotequote all
If you live north of the city you can expect traffic on the way in to town. When people choose to move there it's part of the deal.

The benefit of buying in the north commuter towns is generally lower property prices but with a nightmare commute.

I don't get the moans when folk have made the decision to live there knowing the situation ahead of time.

I support the bypass as it will reduce traffic in town for sure. So +1 from me.

thinfourth2

Original Poster:

32,414 posts

234 months

Thursday 1st September 2011
quotequote all
I wander if we can take roadstupid to court because of the extra traffic we suffer?