Latest purchase....
Author
Discussion

minky monkey

Original Poster:

1,566 posts

195 months

Thursday 1st September 2011
quotequote all
My f4 IS L was struggling under floodlit pitch conditions, so cracked out the trusy c/card for this...







Quick shot with an very unwilling model!

Lovely bit of glass, weighty though. The IS is spot on, and it's as sharp as a very sharp thing. It'll show up user error more than anything. If I could get away with keeping the f4 I would as it's such a good lens, but financially unviable I think.

14-7

6,233 posts

220 months

Thursday 1st September 2011
quotequote all
Git, I've only got a MK I 70-200 cry.

Good purchase though!

McMacro

2,788 posts

186 months

Thursday 1st September 2011
quotequote all
Good choice, love mine too. It's my walkabout lens, hardly ideal for discrete shots though hehe

I had the MKI until someone "borrowed my gear long term". Big difference with the MKII though, much more refined and sharper at 200mm.

minky monkey

Original Poster:

1,566 posts

195 months

Thursday 1st September 2011
quotequote all
I gave serious consideration to getting a used mk1, but for £500 more I got a brand new mk2. I wouldn't have paid the UK retail price, mine came through hdew cameras. Ordered it on Tuesday, and collected today.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Thursday 1st September 2011
quotequote all
mmmm 70-200mkII nice....

crmcatee

5,805 posts

256 months

Thursday 1st September 2011
quotequote all
It is lovely though isn't it.

You do know your tripod mount is upside down (or in the carrying position) don't you. smile

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Thursday 1st September 2011
quotequote all
Wish canon would do a tripod collar like sigmas.

minky monkey

Original Poster:

1,566 posts

195 months

Thursday 1st September 2011
quotequote all
crmcatee said:
You do know your tripod mount is upside down (or in the carrying position) don't you. smile
biggrin

Yup...

I love it, I originally wanted to go for the new 120-300mm OS Sigma, but it doesn't seem to be delivered anytime soon, and in retrospect this will get used alot more given the focal length. It's going to take a little while to get used to it - like all kit really - but I really like what I've seen so far.

Just need to start working out at the gym more...

Robbie B

7,715 posts

212 months

Thursday 1st September 2011
quotequote all
Was the picture of your mog at the full 200mm? It's so crisp! Very jealous.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Thursday 1st September 2011
quotequote all
I'm so tempted with the 120-300OS.

I know I wouldnt take it out as much as I would a 70-200, its truly a large piece of kit.

But 300/2.8 :dream: I've used the non OS one and its fantastic...

minky monkey

Original Poster:

1,566 posts

195 months

Friday 2nd September 2011
quotequote all
Can't remember the focal length off the top of my head, but they've all impressed me so far.

In terms of the 120, I really could use the extra range on the the football pitch, but guess I'll just have to lose some of the longer range shots. I had to change as we'll soon start losing the light earlier and I'll struggle to keep the shutter speed up high enough could definitely use a bit more range. I'm thinking of picking up a 1.4 converter for it.

If it comes to it, I could always hire a 300 for the big games!

LongQ

13,864 posts

262 months

Friday 2nd September 2011
quotequote all
minky monkey said:
Can't remember the focal length off the top of my head, but they've all impressed me so far.

In terms of the 120, I really could use the extra range on the the football pitch, but guess I'll just have to lose some of the longer range shots. I had to change as we'll soon start losing the light earlier and I'll struggle to keep the shutter speed up high enough could definitely use a bit more range. I'm thinking of picking up a 1.4 converter for it.

If it comes to it, I could always hire a 300 for the big games!
You may find that the resolution of the 7D allows you to crop a lot and still get enough detail for your purpose - provided the shot (focus, frozen action area) is at least 'very good' in the first place.

If you have a battery grip on the 7D it should balance very well. I found I got used to it with a day or so even with an extender fitted.

I tend to use mine with a 2x extender (Mk2 version) and that is quite effective. Low light would be a bit of a challenge for focusing options but on a 1D3 I have found that setting Auto ISO on as the 'safety' option is pretty good. ISO 3200 in half decent light is not too bad at all. Not sure if the 7D would give the same results and I appreciate you may not always have half decent light to play with. Might be worth checking it out as a possible option though.

LongQ

13,864 posts

262 months

Friday 2nd September 2011
quotequote all
[redacted]

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Friday 2nd September 2011
quotequote all
70-200f2.8L is not fully weathersealed (lacking the mount gasket), it IS parfocal (making it good for video, and the only 70-200 that is), IQ is as good as the mk1 IS I think.


minky monkey

Original Poster:

1,566 posts

195 months

Friday 2nd September 2011
quotequote all
LongQ said:
You may find that the resolution of the 7D allows you to crop a lot and still get enough detail for your purpose - provided the shot (focus, frozen action area) is at least 'very good' in the first place.

If you have a battery grip on the 7D it should balance very well. I found I got used to it with a day or so even with an extender fitted.

I tend to use mine with a 2x extender (Mk2 version) and that is quite effective. Low light would be a bit of a challenge for focusing options but on a 1D3 I have found that setting Auto ISO on as the 'safety' option is pretty good. ISO 3200 in half decent light is not too bad at all. Not sure if the 7D would give the same results and I appreciate you may not always have half decent light to play with. Might be worth checking it out as a possible option though.
Quite often, with the f4 I'm shooting at 5000 iso and in jpg the 7 gives very good results they just need a little run over with noiseware software, so with the 2.8 this gives me latitude to make sure the shutterspeed can remain high enough for a sharper image.

It depends on the ground I'm at, it's all non league stuff but some are far better than others! I'm fortunate in that Kingstonian are at Kingsmeadow where AFC Wimbledon play, so the ground is up to football league standards.

I'm definitely going to look at an extender, probably the 1.4x.

LongQ

13,864 posts

262 months

Friday 2nd September 2011
quotequote all
minky monkey said:
LongQ said:
You may find that the resolution of the 7D allows you to crop a lot and still get enough detail for your purpose - provided the shot (focus, frozen action area) is at least 'very good' in the first place.

If you have a battery grip on the 7D it should balance very well. I found I got used to it with a day or so even with an extender fitted.

I tend to use mine with a 2x extender (Mk2 version) and that is quite effective. Low light would be a bit of a challenge for focusing options but on a 1D3 I have found that setting Auto ISO on as the 'safety' option is pretty good. ISO 3200 in half decent light is not too bad at all. Not sure if the 7D would give the same results and I appreciate you may not always have half decent light to play with. Might be worth checking it out as a possible option though.
Quite often, with the f4 I'm shooting at 5000 iso and in jpg the 7 gives very good results they just need a little run over with noiseware software, so with the 2.8 this gives me latitude to make sure the shutterspeed can remain high enough for a sharper image.

It depends on the ground I'm at, it's all non league stuff but some are far better than others! I'm fortunate in that Kingstonian are at Kingsmeadow where AFC Wimbledon play, so the ground is up to football league standards.

I'm definitely going to look at an extender, probably the 1.4x.
1.4x would make sense in many ways as it would still just about give you a short enough length to work with nearby. That said at 70mm on a 1.3 crop (1D3) with a 2x fitted the equivalent 35mm is about 185mm and a 1.4x on a 1.6 crop is about 160mm (in round figures) so not much in it. I find with the 2x fitted the short end can be a bit long at times with a near subject - great for touchline head shots though I would think!