Cars that couldn't of been more different from the advert
Cars that couldn't of been more different from the advert
Author
Discussion

andy-xr

13,204 posts

225 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
There was a thread kicking around a couple of years ago about a guy selling an MR2 turbo. Later transpired that the turbo was missing on this particular example

beatngu

Original Poster:

173 posts

173 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
andy-xr said:
There was a thread kicking around a couple of years ago about a guy selling an MR2 turbo. Later transpired that the turbo was missing on this particular example
Oh dear. biggrin

That's the sort of move a dealer would make & try to blag it.

dvance

605 posts

189 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
beatngu said:
What's yours? biggrin

Golf MK3 GTI
"5 Doors, Manual, Hatchback, Petrol, 121,000 miles, Black. Air conditioning, Head restraints,
Heated seats, Leather seats, Passenger airbag, Pearlescent paint, Sports seats, Sunroof, Towbar,
PART EXCHANGE TO CLEAR, LONG MOT, VERY CLEAN CAR. Insurance Group:14, £950"

Right then, this was on an MK3 Golf from a dealer. I couldn't understand a word the guy was saying, English obviously wasn't his first language & i was getting annoyed just at the fact i was asking him to repeat himself. (i hate coming across as rude)

Which coming from someone with a stutter is quite something. biggrin


Anyway, what was different from the ad?



- No heated seats
- No leather seats
- Acid/similar thrown down the side (was extreme peeling either way)
- No Air con
- No headlight lens (smashed)
- Rear window dropped
- No MOT
- No Tax
- No speakers/Radio
- Wasn't at the garage so had to give the dealer a lift to go see it!
- Not a very clean car.



Edited by beatngu on Tuesday 6th September 16:54
Should have charged him for your time and fuel.

Hudson

1,857 posts

208 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
andy-xr said:
There was a thread kicking around a couple of years ago about a guy selling an MR2 turbo. Later transpired that the turbo was missing on this particular example
hehe I can imagine the dealer telling some poor sod about the limited edition Toyota MR2 Non-turbo turbo

danyeates

7,248 posts

243 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
  • Waits for someone to inform you about your mistake in the title! smile

Gad-Westy

16,116 posts

234 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
danyeates said:
* Waits for someone to inform you about your mistake in the title! smile
It's really hurting me. I want to scream out loud every time I see it!

filski666

3,863 posts

213 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
Gad-Westy said:
It's really hurting me. I want to scream out loud every time I see it!
I only came to the thread to see if the grammar bashing had started!

wink

beatngu

Original Poster:

173 posts

173 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
'Which' I can't edit the title. frown

havehavehave

Edited by beatngu on Tuesday 6th September 17:17

pops and bangs

674 posts

178 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
I haven't come across people lying about spec, not sure what goes through peoples heads when they write the advert.

But cars being classed as mint or dent free when they clearly aren't is very common.

I know condition is often down to an individuals perception, e.g what I call "mint" might be average to someone else.

But saying a car is mint and having a massive dent in the drivers door is taking the mickey....

filski666

3,863 posts

213 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
beatngu said:
'Which' I can't edit the title. frown
close..but not quite

beatngu

Original Poster:

173 posts

173 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
dvance said:
Should have charged him for your time and fuel.
In hindsight i would of, i've owned a few vehicles since & learned lessons on a lot of thing.


pops and bangs said:
I haven't come across people lying about spec, not sure what goes through peoples heads when they write the advert.

But cars being classed as mint or dent free when they clearly aren't is very common.

I know condition is often down to an individuals perception, e.g what I call "mint" might be average to someone else.

But saying a car is mint and having a massive dent in the drivers door is taking the mickey....
Dealers will describe anything as mint it seems, almost like it's a default keyword in the description. If they don't mention it's great condition, there's usually no mentioned of condition at all. Another stty tactic if you're a buyer but good for the dealer (same with mileage/tax/MOT etc.


filski666

3,863 posts

213 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
beatngu said:
dvance said:
Should have charged him for your time and fuel.
In hindsight i would of, i've owned a few vehicles since & learned lessons on a lot of thing.
please stop it.......

Twincam16

27,647 posts

279 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
I've lost count of the number of Celica GT-Fours I've seen advertised that are just standard GT 2-litres.

Worst one I encountered was a Mercedes 300CE that I checked the condition of over the phone the day before. Seemed OK, maybe a bit tatty around the edges, but passable nonetheless. I even asked if a test drive was possible and they said yes.

When I drove the 37 miles to Nottingham to see it, it was sitting on flat tyres, weeds growing around it, boxed in by cars some of which didn't have engines in them. It was being advertised as a good runner (still advertised in fact - must be costing them a fortune on Auto Trader) in average condition.

Worst thing was, the tattooed, three-toothed s selling it were rolling on the floor with laughter, as though persuading someone to drive a not inconsiderable distance to look at an immobile, rusting hulk they'd described as a reasonable runner was somehow hilarious.

I honestly can't understand how they stay in business with an attitude like that.

bababa

132 posts

185 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
I drove 50 miles to see a Saab 9000 at a dealer. When I got there, contrary to the advertisment *and* the chat with the dealer himself over the phone, it didn't have A/C and had an extra 20k on the clock.

I guess some unscrupulous sellers may fib about some options just to get you there on the premise that, even though you may be slightly disappointed about the missing equipment, you'll buy the car anyway because you'd made all the effort to travel to see it.

Needless to say, I walked.

beatngu

Original Poster:

173 posts

173 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
filski666 said:
please stop it.......
Have.

You didn't use a capital P!!11

StottyZr

6,860 posts

184 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
filski666 said:
beatngu said:
'Which' I can't edit the title. frown
close..but not quite
laugh you're trying at least. The word "of" should say "have"

Please, please don't be wrong getmecoat

beatngu

Original Poster:

173 posts

173 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
Tried to delete original post to edit hoping i could create another, guess not.

Anyway, original post was;

What's yours?

Golf MK3 GTI
"5 Doors, Manual, Hatchback, Petrol, 121,000 miles, Black. Air conditioning, Head restraints,
Heated seats, Leather seats, Passenger airbag, Pearlescent paint, Sports seats, Sunroof, Towbar,
PART EXCHANGE TO CLEAR, LONG MOT, VERY CLEAN CAR. Insurance Group:14, £950"

Right then, this was on an MK3 Golf from a dealer. I couldn't understand a word the guy was saying, English obviously wasn't his first language & i was getting annoyed just at the fact i was asking him to repeat himself. (i hate coming across as rude)

Which coming from someone with a stutter is quite something. biggrin


Anyway, what was different from the ad?



- No heated seats
- No leather seats
- Acid/similar thrown down the side (was extreme peeling either way)
- No Air con
- No headlight lens (smashed)
- Rear window dropped
- No MOT
- No Tax
- No speakers/Radio
- Wasn't at the garage so had to give the dealer a lift to go see it!
- Not a very clean car.

beatngu

Original Poster:

173 posts

173 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
Twincam16 said:
I've lost count of the number of Celica GT-Fours I've seen advertised that are just standard GT 2-litres.

Worst one I encountered was a Mercedes 300CE that I checked the condition of over the phone the day before. Seemed OK, maybe a bit tatty around the edges, but passable nonetheless. I even asked if a test drive was possible and they said yes.

When I drove the 37 miles to Nottingham to see it, it was sitting on flat tyres, weeds growing around it, boxed in by cars some of which didn't have engines in them. It was being advertised as a good runner (still advertised in fact - must be costing them a fortune on Auto Trader) in average condition.

Worst thing was, the tattooed, three-toothed s selling it were rolling on the floor with laughter, as though persuading someone to drive a not inconsiderable distance to look at an immobile, rusting hulk they'd described as a reasonable runner was somehow hilarious.

I honestly can't understand how they stay in business with an attitude like that.
Goes beyond taking the piss, a practical joke. The joys of buying vehicles!


bababa said:
I drove 50 miles to see a Saab 9000 at a dealer. When I got there, contrary to the advertisment *and* the chat with the dealer himself over the phone, it didn't have A/C and had an extra 20k on the clock.

I guess some unscrupulous sellers may fib about some options just to get you there on the premise that, even though you may be slightly disappointed about the missing equipment, you'll buy the car anyway because you'd made all the effort to travel to see it.

Needless to say, I walked.
Wouldn't be surprised if this worked a majority of the time. I honestly couldn't face someone after telling a pack of lies, i guess i wouldn't be a very good salesman..

Was this an independent?

Edited by beatngu on Tuesday 6th September 17:31

WeirdNeville

6,033 posts

236 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
I went to see a 200SX that was advertised as good condition, mechanically perfect, 80K miles.
Turned up and it was 110k miles and it had a dent in the bonnet that looked like it had had a brick dropped on it from height. I drove it anyway (because I had my wife with me and wanted to make sure she would get on with one) at which point a really horrific top end rattle became apparent. When I got back the dealer enquired if I was interested. I listed the major faults with it as I saw them, and politely declined his offer to take ownership.
He turned to his oppo and said "See, I told you, that car's fkED".

I'm also reminded of the original 80's Volvo 340 Ad, where they compare it to both a BMW (RWD) and a Maserati (transaxle) to laud it's handling credentials. Chose to forget about the horrific steering and cart sprung live axle though, didn't you volvo?!

Randy Winkman

20,260 posts

210 months

Tuesday 6th September 2011
quotequote all
I went to Leeds (from SE London) to see a car that was one (registration) year older than it appeared from the picture in the advert. It seemed that the seller had been driving it around with the registration plates from her other car and had photographed it with them still on.

Also, contrary to the ad, it had no service history at all. Also, it was not in "excellent condition" since it had a scratch the full length of one side and the entire underside was caked in mud.

I still test drove it ...... so I could end up back at Leeds Station and go home.