Who is your money on then...
Who is your money on then...
Author
Discussion

DayTrader

Original Poster:

776 posts

198 months

Roberty

1,180 posts

203 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
Not really surprised at the outcome.


Midds

247 posts

269 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
I wonder how many more metres would be required for the 458 to overhaul the GT-R?

DayTrader

Original Poster:

776 posts

198 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
Midds said:
I wonder how many more metres would be required for the 458 to overhaul the GT-R?
Not very many I think would be a good guess - it was gaining pretty quickly!

Slurms

1,254 posts

235 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
DayTrader said:
Midds said:
I wonder how many more metres would be required for the 458 to overhaul the GT-R?
Not very many I think would be a good guess - it was gaining pretty quickly!
Shame there was no MP4-12C

UH-Matt

2,173 posts

271 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
Slurms said:
DayTrader said:
Midds said:
I wonder how many more metres would be required for the 458 to overhaul the GT-R?
Not very many I think would be a good guess - it was gaining pretty quickly!
Shame there was no MP4-12C
They said drivers cars winkbiggrin

Streetrod

6,484 posts

237 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
What’s more interesting is when you watch the accompanying video of the laps at Laguna Seca. Here are some of the times:

458 1.36.22
GTR 1.36.35
R8 1.36.39

What I'm most surprised about is how quick the R8 is. As for the GTR, it’s just continues to punch well above its weight.


Now here's the shocker, look how fast the Corvette ZO6 is, how much the tyres contributed I'm not sure but it makes the 458 look slow:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wheEOSdDi9w&fea...

Edited by Streetrod on Tuesday 13th September 14:59

Slurms

1,254 posts

235 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
UH-Matt said:
Slurms said:
DayTrader said:
Midds said:
I wonder how many more metres would be required for the 458 to overhaul the GT-R?
Not very many I think would be a good guess - it was gaining pretty quickly!
Shame there was no MP4-12C
They said drivers cars winkbiggrin
So how did the 'vette and the mustang make it in biggrin

cayman-black

13,268 posts

247 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
Thanks . That was good. Not so bad the 458,GTR unbelievably quick.

Streetrod

6,484 posts

237 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
cayman-black said:
Thanks . That was good. Not so bad the 458,GTR unbelievably quick.
Yeah but the Corvette was way faster than both of them around the track 1.34.43 compared to the 458 at 1.36.22

cayman-black

13,268 posts

247 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
Really???. Thought the Vette would have done better in the drag .

BelfastBoy

779 posts

191 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
I know the GTR's a total Marmite car but I think it's amazing. Yet another indication of just how marvellous a piece of engineering it is - traction off the line is spectacular, like Usain Bolt's false start in Daegu! It's equally good in a straight line or going around corners, and all for £70k. It might not be a 'supercar' but I think it's certainly a super car.

The 458 was easily hauling it in though, and must've been gaining speed quicker as the terminal speed was greater than the GTR's.

crostonian

2,427 posts

203 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
Thought the 458 looked a slow starter considering it has launch control.

JimexPL

1,454 posts

243 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
Streetrod said:
What’s more interesting is when you watch the accompanying video of the laps at Laguna Seca. Here are some of the times:

458 1.36.22
GTR 1.36.35
R8 1.36.39

What I'm most surprised about is how quick the R8 is. As for the GTR, it’s just continues to punch well above its weight.

Now here's the shocker, look how fast the Corvette ZO6 is, how much the tyres contributed I'm not sure but it makes the 458 look slow:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wheEOSdDi9w&fea...

Edited by Streetrod on Tuesday 13th September 14:59
Whatever benefit the tyres gave would surely be offset by the slow changing manual gearbox and 50hp power deficiency? I doubt the 458 was let out with less than optimum factory fit rubber.
Take that into account and the Z06 is very impressive for £100k!

70proof

6,158 posts

186 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
most embarrassing for the lexus lfa.... 300k hypercar wasn't it??

more amazing if you consider that the GTR is a lardy 1700kg!!!!!

DayTrader

Original Poster:

776 posts

198 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
70proof said:
most embarrassing for the lexus lfa.... 300k hypercar wasn't it??

more amazing if you consider that the GTR is a lardy 1700kg!!!!!
To be fair I have seen a clip by Motor Trend where the LFA beats the GTR in a drag race - so different drivers obviously having a big impact there.

Plus, it's worth 300k just for that sound - pure F1.

Frik

13,692 posts

274 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
A 911 Turbo would of given the GTR a run for it's money. An S with PDK might even have beaten it.

kryten22uk

2,350 posts

262 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
Blimey, I thought that the GTR only came into it's own in the bendy bits. Didnt realise it was fast in drag race too!

Pesty

42,655 posts

287 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
70proof said:
most embarrassing for the lexus lfa.... 300k hypercar wasn't it??

more amazing if you consider that the GTR is a lardy 1700kg!!!!!
I don;t care I would take the LFA in a heart beat.

Those GTRs' are something else.

Pity no GT2RS or Lamborghini there

kbf1981

2,351 posts

231 months

Tuesday 13th September 2011
quotequote all
Frik said:
A 911 Turbo would of given the GTR a run for it's money. An S with PDK might even have beaten it.
It does beat it. There's a bunch of clips on YouTube. 2.9s to 60...