USA "very close" to selling some 18 F16 fig
USA "very close" to selling some 18 F16 fig
Author
Discussion

JonRB

Original Poster:

80,124 posts

302 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
Telegraph said:
Iraq had frozen the $4.2 billion deal earlier this year amid the Arab Spring pro-democracy uprisings, but the prospects were "promising" for the contract to now move ahead, General Russ Handy, head of the US air forces in Iraq, said.

"They are seeking to buy a larger number of F16s (than) they had originally, up to 36. This first letter of offer and acceptance is for 18 of them, so we hope to hear very soon, but no final word yet on that," Handy told reporters.

"Everyone I talk to, everyone within the government in Iraq is convinced it's the right choice for them, so we are very encouraged by those words and we feel that we are very close to them signing that letter of offer and acceptance."

The news comes after US Secretary of the Air Force Michael Donley visited Iraq earlier this month for talks on the F16 sale after Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki said on July 30 that he had revived the talks.

But Maliki said then that Iraq was looking at the purchase of some 36 jets, rather than the originally mooted 18. "The new contract will be larger than what we agreed earlier, to provide security for Iraq," he said.

Any deal would be worth billions of dollars and take years to implement, as it would require the manufacture of the aircraft and the training of Iraqi pilots.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleea...

Wait, what.... *manufacture*? When they have loads of them in deep storage at various boneyards around the USA? I call bullst.

Or rubbish reporting. The latter is sadly par for the course.

Edit: Sorry about the title. Should have read "USA to sell 18 F16 jets to Iraq" but something went wrong.

hornetrider

63,161 posts

235 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
JonRB said:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleea...

Wait, what.... *manufacture*? When they have loads of them in deep storage at various boneyards around the USA? I call bullst.

Or rubbish reporting. The latter is sadly par for the course.
If they have airframes lying around it takes slightly more effort than a squirt of WD40 to get them airworthy again!

bigbubba

1,005 posts

249 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
What makes you think Iraq would want 'Used' F16's?

The country has enough money to buy new.

BB

Jasandjules

72,651 posts

259 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
See, it was worth invading after all. Oil AND sales.

HarryW

16,052 posts

299 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
Plenty of old variants lying around the US, they'll probably gift them but sell the reactivation and upgrade costs, plenty of work and profit in that, win win for them.............

maser_spyder

6,356 posts

212 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
Said through gritted teeth and knowing there's a knife resting just beneath his ribs methinks.

But surely we wouldn't expect anything else?

Victor McDade

4,395 posts

212 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
See, it was worth invading after all. Oil AND sales.
4000+ dead Americans and 3 trillion dollars worse off. A $4billion deal is a drop in the ocean here. Then again, the profit is going to the private sector whilst the poor American taxpayers are left to foot the bill for the Iraq adventure.

Seems to be a growing trend in societies like ours now.

JonRB

Original Poster:

80,124 posts

302 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
If they have airframes lying around it takes slightly more effort than a squirt of WD40 to get them airworthy again!
There are several boneyards around the USA in places like the Mojave desert where airworthy planes are shrink-wrapped in plastic waiting to be reactivated, preserved against the elements by the arid desert conditions. And there are far more than eighteen F16s in such a state. So I stand by what I said.

Oakey

27,984 posts

246 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
then we can blow them all to st at the next round of regime change

bigbubba

1,005 posts

249 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
JonRB said:
There are several boneyards around the USA in places like the Mojave desert where airworthy planes are shrink-wrapped in plastic waiting to be reactivated, preserved against the elements by the arid desert conditions. And there are far more than eighteen F16s in such a state. So I stand by what I said.
There are hundreds of F16's in bone yards.

Iraq has more cash than the US so why would they want their cast offs?

BB

dmulally

6,403 posts

210 months

Wednesday 14th September 2011
quotequote all
bigbubba said:
There are hundreds of F16's in bone yards.

Iraq has more cash than the US so why would they want their cast offs?

BB
I have more cash than the US currently.

But to answer your question is because they were told to I guess. PR stunt and will make a good sound byte.

HarryW

16,052 posts

299 months

Thursday 15th September 2011
quotequote all
and if not true it could raise doubts in anyone considering buying something like 'expensive' Typhoons, it's something LM has already done in other parts of the region, sell em old unwanted F16's cheap and shaft them for the upgrades and bolt on's, lambs to the corporate slaughter.

JonRB

Original Poster:

80,124 posts

302 months

Thursday 15th September 2011
quotequote all
bigbubba said:
There are hundreds of F16's in bone yards.

Iraq has more cash than the US so why would they want their cast offs?

BB
Because if they want F16s then, by definition, they either can't afford (or can't acquire) anything better.

slipstream 1985

13,778 posts

209 months

Thursday 15th September 2011
quotequote all
eurofighter?

JaybirdUK

1,867 posts

197 months

Thursday 15th September 2011
quotequote all

Elroy Blue

8,849 posts

222 months

Thursday 15th September 2011
quotequote all
JonRB said:
There are several boneyards around the USA in places like the Mojave desert where airworthy planes are shrink-wrapped in plastic waiting to be reactivated, preserved against the elements by the arid desert conditions. And there are far more than eighteen F16s in such a state. So I stand by what I said.
The majority have no fatigue life left (and are being converted to target drones). Any 'reactivation' would indeed cost millions of dollars per airframe.

bigbubba

1,005 posts

249 months

Thursday 15th September 2011
quotequote all
JonRB said:
Because if they want F16s then, by definition, they either can't afford (or can't acquire) anything better.
That's not true.

They could buy Russian kit for less money.

They would have no issue getting it either.

JonRB

Original Poster:

80,124 posts

302 months

Thursday 15th September 2011
quotequote all
bigbubba said:
JonRB said:
Because if they want F16s then, by definition, they either can't afford (or can't acquire) anything better.
That's not true.

They could buy Russian kit for less money.

They would have no issue getting it either.
So why aren't they? The F16 isn't particularly cutting edge any more.

Badgerboy

1,794 posts

222 months

Thursday 15th September 2011
quotequote all
Elroy Blue said:
The majority have no fatigue life left (and are being converted to target drones). Any 'reactivation' would indeed cost millions of dollars per airframe.
Are all likely mostly older block revisions too, far easier to buy new and benefit from the new capabilities.