Mid size Tudor sub v full size.
Mid size Tudor sub v full size.
Author
Discussion

JABB

Original Poster:

3,609 posts

267 months

Sunday 18th September 2011
quotequote all
Anyone got a link to a proper next to each other mid size Tudor sub verses a full size tudor or rolex sub? Even better would be the mini, mid and full size ( Not wanting a ladies size as I think Tudor do 4 sizes )
Better still, has anyone got a mid size with photos to view?
I have a feeling the std Rolex sub is just too big for me, but as I can see, the Tudor subs don't have the bulbous back to them so they are slimmer?

Gazzab

21,705 posts

313 months

Tuesday 20th September 2011
quotequote all
The older subs are slightly smaller than current ones afaik.
An older sub isnt a large watch, not by today's blinged up standards.

JABB

Original Poster:

3,609 posts

267 months

Tuesday 20th September 2011
quotequote all
My wrist is only 7" diam. The newer subs look a little big and the bubble on the back with a canvas strap pushes the watch too far out.

Gazzab

21,705 posts

313 months

Tuesday 20th September 2011
quotequote all
7" wrist is not small. Mine arent that much bigger and my 70's sub fits well and in anything looks quite small on my wrist.

RichTT

3,266 posts

202 months

Wednesday 21st September 2011
quotequote all
JABB said:
My wrist is only 7" diam. The newer subs look a little big and the bubble on the back with a canvas strap pushes the watch too far out.
My wrist is only 7" but I can quite happily wear up to 48mm watches as long as they arn't too thick. A 40mm sub (ceramic or non-ceramic) look quite small tbh.