Discussion
I always assumed they were measuring the length of time it takes your wheels to runover the first one, to them running over the second one - thus detecting your speed.
I guess the info is used to gauge whether local traffic calming measures (cameras, warning signs, speed bumps etc) are needed.
But I could be totally wrong.
I guess the info is used to gauge whether local traffic calming measures (cameras, warning signs, speed bumps etc) are needed.
But I could be totally wrong.
Lippy Kid said:
I always assumed they were measuring the length of time it takes your wheels to runover the first one, to them running over the second one - thus detecting your speed.
I guess the info is used to gauge whether local traffic calming measures (cameras, warning signs, speed bumps etc) are needed.
But I could be totally wrong.
This is what i always thought aswell.I guess the info is used to gauge whether local traffic calming measures (cameras, warning signs, speed bumps etc) are needed.
But I could be totally wrong.
Lippy Kid said:
I always assumed they were measuring the length of time it takes your wheels to runover the first one, to them running over the second one - thus detecting your speed.
I guess the info is used to gauge whether local traffic calming measures (cameras, warning signs, speed bumps etc) are needed.
But I could be totally wrong.
I can't see how that would work though as a range rover will have a different distance between the front and rear wheels than a mini so each car will have a different time between the front and rear wheels at the same speed.I guess the info is used to gauge whether local traffic calming measures (cameras, warning signs, speed bumps etc) are needed.
But I could be totally wrong.
Caesar9 said:
Lippy Kid said:
I always assumed they were measuring the length of time it takes your wheels to runover the first one, to them running over the second one - thus detecting your speed.
I guess the info is used to gauge whether local traffic calming measures (cameras, warning signs, speed bumps etc) are needed.
But I could be totally wrong.
I can't see how that would work though as a range rover will have a different distance between the front and rear wheels than a mini so each car will have a different time between the front and rear wheels at the same speed.I guess the info is used to gauge whether local traffic calming measures (cameras, warning signs, speed bumps etc) are needed.
But I could be totally wrong.
One cable across the road can be used to measure total traffic flow, two cables can measure traffic flow in each direction!
Caesar9 said:
I can't see how that would work though as a range rover will have a different distance between the front and rear wheels than a mini
I was thinking this:Ari said:
Two lines so time between front wheels running over first and second lines.
However, it seems I'm wrong anyway...PoleDriver said:
????? You wouldn't need to sense front and rear wheels! That's why there are two cables! Front wheels would hit cable #1 then cable #2, speed can then be derived from time taken. But they aren't used for that, they have cameras for that job.
After I saw a biker pop a wheelie over one of the black line things (which I believe are used to measure traffic flow, something tells me the recent surge of them is to do with priority for council gritting through the coming winter), I wonder what the box would record for wheelie girl/boy and random folks jumping on the cables.
nixon1905 said:
PoleDriver said:
????? You wouldn't need to sense front and rear wheels! That's why there are two cables! Front wheels would hit cable #1 then cable #2, speed can then be derived from time taken.
You're sort of right! But to derive the speed you need to know the distance between the front and rear wheels as well, Speed = Dist/time. Basically its not possible with that particular cable set up and different lengths of cars going over the top!nixon1905 said:
You're sort of right! But to derive the speed you need to know the distance between the front and rear wheels as well, Speed = Dist/time. Basically its not possible with that particular cable set up and different lengths of cars going over the top!
I'm not sure! If the system is programmed to know the distance between the two cables, then a time log will reveal the speed of the car going over it with one set of wheels - the front wheels will hit the first cable, starting the timer, and then hit the second set, stopping it.Speed is distance over time, so if the distance between the two cables is known then it's just a case of measuring the time taken between the first cable triggering and the second cable triggering.
ETA: damn slow fingers and overactive brain.
sebhaque said:
I'm not sure! If the system is programmed to know the distance between the two cables, then a time log will reveal the speed of the car going over it with one set of wheels - the front wheels will hit the first cable, starting the timer, and then hit the second set, stopping it.
Speed is distance over time, so if the distance between the two cables is known then it's just a case of measuring the time taken between the first cable triggering and the second cable triggering.
That is assuming a standard distance between front and rear axle. A Fiesta and a lorry are going to provide vastly different results Speed is distance over time, so if the distance between the two cables is known then it's just a case of measuring the time taken between the first cable triggering and the second cable triggering.

Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





