How much horse power is needed for Xmph?
How much horse power is needed for Xmph?
Author
Discussion

XitUp

Original Poster:

7,690 posts

225 months

Sunday 23rd October 2011
quotequote all
If you know the CdA of a car, how do you work out how many horses it would need to hit 100/150/200/etc mph?

Sorry if this has been covered on the forum before, but the search function is crap.

Ta.

Marf

22,907 posts

262 months

Sunday 23rd October 2011
quotequote all
Depends on W too.

Heretic

103 posts

171 months

Sunday 23rd October 2011
quotequote all
you are being too vague. There are so many variables you have left up in the air, that the question is unanswerable

Noger

7,117 posts

270 months

Sunday 23rd October 2011
quotequote all
It doesn't really. W just tells you how long it takes to get there smile

CdA = bhp (at the wheels) * 8400 / mph ^3

So, bhp = CdA x mph ^3 / 8400



Edited by Noger on Sunday 23 October 20:00

XitUp

Original Poster:

7,690 posts

225 months

Sunday 23rd October 2011
quotequote all
Marf said:
Depends on W too.
Not really.

Heretic said:
you are being too vague. There are so many variables you have left up in the air, that the question is unanswerable
What like? I know rolling resistance of the tyres will have a bit of an impact.

Noger said:
It doesn't really. W just tells you how long it takes to get there smile

CdA = bhp (at the wheels) * 8400 / mph ^3

So, bhp = CdA x mph ^3 / 8400
Thanks.

davepoth

29,395 posts

220 months

Sunday 23rd October 2011
quotequote all
Also depends on the rolling resistance of the tyres.

XitUp

Original Poster:

7,690 posts

225 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
Thanks. wink

So if a car had a CdA of 5.10, roughly how much would it need?

Noger

7,117 posts

270 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
That is quite slippery smile

So 5.1 sq ft is 0.474 sq m.

So...

100mph needs 56 bhp at the wheels
150mph needs 190 bhp at the wheels
200mph needs 451 bhp at the wheels


kambites

70,374 posts

242 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
Planning on getting a mk1 Insight to 200mph? hehe

rsv gone!

11,288 posts

262 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
The only statistic I have to hand is that a faired motorbike only needs 30bhp to do 100mph.

XitUp

Original Poster:

7,690 posts

225 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
Planning on getting a mk1 Insight to 200mph? hehe
Good guess!

I was bored driving home from Leicester yesterday and my mind was wandering thinking about it. All I need to do is find one for sale, get some forged internals and a turbo off a diesel train.

Noger

7,117 posts

270 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
rsv gone! said:
The only statistic I have to hand is that a faired motorbike only needs 30bhp to do 100mph.
Yes, CdA (guess) of .19 gives 23 bhp needed for 100mph.

Bikes are not very aerodynamically efficient, but there ain't much of em smile

Heretic

103 posts

171 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
after power, gearing is the next thing to look at. Wind drag also changes with speed. As you go faster the wind will actually try to "flatten" out the front of a vehicle. Wind drag increases with speed, and can change with atmospheric conditions. Tire size will increase with centrifugal force, and that will change the drag under a vehicle. Proper alignment and tire inflation can be contributing factors to top speed. Even the medium on which you are driving can make a difference in tire resistance.
never assume that speed is a matter of a figure on paper. It will bite you in the posterior every time. The numbers on paper are just a starting point. It is something that should be researched, but that number will always be low

XitUp

Original Poster:

7,690 posts

225 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
I know.

I was just looking for a ballpark figure.

I'm not actually going to try building a 200mph Insight. My girlfriend wouldn't let me.

kambites

70,374 posts

242 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
It probably wouldn't be that hard actually - take out the existing drive-train and stick in a transverse turbocharged V6, old Noble style. There's a decent amount of room back there.

The Nur

9,168 posts

206 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
It probably wouldn't be that hard actually - take out the existing drive-train and stick in a transverse turbocharged V6, old Noble style. There's a decent amount of room back there.
That sounds like a challenge if ever there was one. Now who on here has a disposable insight?

CraigyMc

18,066 posts

257 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
XitUp said:
I know.

I was just looking for a ballpark figure.

I'm not actually going to try building a 200mph Insight. My girlfriend wouldn't let me.
It'd be interesting trying to keep that on the ground.

If you chuck a car out the back of a plane, it will fall at approx. 110mph (at least, according to some skydiving types who have tried it - albeit a car with no engine).

Think about a car shoving itself along the ground at 200mph and that's how unstable it is, unless it's got some sort of downforce.

C

kambites

70,374 posts

242 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
I suspect that all you'd need is an air-dam. It will presumably already be designed to sheer the airflow at the back quite effectively to reduce drag·

XitUp

Original Poster:

7,690 posts

225 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
Noooo. I was pondering what the best way to beat the land speed record for a <1000cc car was.

kambites

70,374 posts

242 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
XitUp said:
Noooo. I was pondering what the best way to beat the land speed record for a <1000cc car was.
A formula Ford with a turbocharged motorbike engine?