Armed Guards on British Ships
Author
Discussion

Zaxxon

Original Poster:

4,057 posts

191 months

Sunday 30th October 2011
quotequote all
Now if that wasn't a perfect job for a current serviceman pondering leaving the forces, I don't know what is. It would be ideal for a Royal Marine or pongo smile that had just left or was soon to leave the forces.

Bet it would be good money and maybe even tax exempt. If only it had been a possible career choice in 98.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15510467

Although I do know of two guys that have been employed to do this since last year. Not armed, not officially anyway.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

277 months

Sunday 30th October 2011
quotequote all
Zaxxon said:
If only it had been a possible career choice in 98.
Doesn't sound much of a career. Sit on large boat for months on end doing nothing.

In reality the ship owners don't need to hire military specialists. They can send the existing crew on a training course for a couple of days and then issue them with weapons. The likelihood of pirate encounters will remain low and a hail of machine-gun bullets should soon see off the would-be pirates.

Langweilig

4,505 posts

242 months

Sunday 30th October 2011
quotequote all
And already, according to the BBC news, the cheese-eating surrender monkeys are complaining, "Oh no, can't do that, not fair, shoot to kill policy, armed guards can't be trusted, poor pirates etc."

fandango_c

1,993 posts

217 months

Sunday 30th October 2011
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
In reality the ship owners don't need to hire military specialists. They can send the existing crew on a training course for a couple of days and then issue them with weapons. The likelihood of pirate encounters will remain low and a hail of machine-gun bullets should soon see off the would-be pirates.
Yes, a couple of days training is adequate to train sailors to use firearms in a combat situation.....

EDLT

15,421 posts

237 months

Sunday 30th October 2011
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
Zaxxon said:
If only it had been a possible career choice in 98.
Doesn't sound much of a career. Sit on large boat for months on end doing nothing.
So like being in the Navy then?

LimaDelta

8,522 posts

249 months

Sunday 30th October 2011
quotequote all
Armed guards are ok, but carpet bombing Somalia would be better.

chimaeras

109 posts

191 months

Sunday 30th October 2011
quotequote all
No Syria is next ! Somalia will have to wait.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

277 months

Sunday 30th October 2011
quotequote all
EDLT said:
So like being in the Navy then?
Only if you can't tell the difference between a container ship and a submarine/aircraft carrier/destroyer.

The reality is bloke with machine gun high up on big ship has a huge advantage over a few chancers bobbing about on a motor launch.

Zaxxon

Original Poster:

4,057 posts

191 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
Only if you can't tell the difference between a container ship and a submarine/aircraft carrier/destroyer.

The reality is bloke with machine gun high up on big ship has a huge advantage over a few chancers bobbing about on a motor launch.
And of course a civvy with a training course certificate and an M-16 is going to have a clue how to defend a ship, fire a weapon whilst taking fire and then defend the ship and retake it if the pirates actually managed to get on board?

What is this training course? Playstation Battlefield 3?

dmulally

6,403 posts

211 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
Zaxxon said:
Now if that wasn't a perfect job for a current serviceman pondering leaving the forces, I don't know what is. It would be ideal for a Royal Marine or pongo smile that had just left or was soon to leave the forces.

Bet it would be good money and maybe even tax exempt. If only it had been a possible career choice in 98.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15510467

Although I do know of two guys that have been employed to do this since last year. Not armed, not officially anyway.
Pongo? Typical pusser!!!! wink

When I was a lowly platoon commander I had to send a couple of diggers away as armed escort for a jolly to Antarctica. They got to test fire when ever they liked. First I knew anything about what they were up to was when my CO (OC next to me) was tearing me a new one for me NOT giving orders to not shoot the wildlife. Seals, penguins etc.

Like kittens in a basket of wool getting into mischief...

Jasandjules

72,673 posts

260 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
They can send the existing crew on a training course for a couple of days and then issue them with weapons.
You really think that would work?

Don't get me wrong, the Russians did it in World War 2, but then look at their casualty rates.....

Cyder

7,190 posts

251 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
I know a bloke who does this already. He's ex Royal Marine and spends about 6 months of the year working and the other 6 months at home so I guess it pays well!

jeff m2

2,060 posts

182 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
dmulally said:
Pongo? Typical pusser!!!! wink

When I was a lowly platoon commander I had to send a couple of diggers away as armed escort for a jolly to Antarctica. They got to test fire when ever they liked. First I knew anything about what they were up to was when my CO (OC next to me) was tearing me a new one for me NOT giving orders to not shoot the wildlife. Seals, penguins etc.

Like kittens in a basket of wool getting into mischief...
That's pretty funny, in retrospect.

They looked menacing Sar


bga

8,134 posts

282 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
You really think that would work?

Don't get me wrong, the Russians did it in World War 2, but then look at their casualty rates.....
Those rates may have been different if they were being approached by a handful of guys on a skiff.

Saddle bum

4,211 posts

250 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
Cyder said:
I know a bloke who does this already. He's ex Royal Marine and spends about 6 months of the year working and the other 6 months at home so I guess it pays well!
Ditto. The carrying of armed personel must be happening already. The gubbermint appears to be trying to make us believe it was their idea.

Asterix

24,438 posts

259 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
They can send the existing crew on a training course for a couple of days and then issue them with weapons.
Arf - silliest comment I've seen for a while. Why not get a few YTS lads to try their hand at bomb disposal?

Jasandjules

72,673 posts

260 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
bga said:
Those rates may have been different if they were being approached by a handful of guys on a skiff.
Yes but the Friendly Fire and Negligent Discharge rates would go up instead..........


98elise

32,795 posts

192 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
Asterix said:
Ozzie Osmond said:
They can send the existing crew on a training course for a couple of days and then issue them with weapons.
Arf - silliest comment I've seen for a while. Why not get a few YTS lads to try their hand at bomb disposal?
Its about as much small arms training the average RN person gets.

FourWheelDrift

92,373 posts

315 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
Around 200 UK ships on the UK registry, but there's almost the same amount of UK ships carrying flags of convenience (Liberia, Panama etc) Do any UK ships currently carry armed guards under different flags? I wonder how many might be re-registered to the UK again if not. Cost against protection.

Asterix

24,438 posts

259 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
98elise said:
Asterix said:
Ozzie Osmond said:
They can send the existing crew on a training course for a couple of days and then issue them with weapons.
Arf - silliest comment I've seen for a while. Why not get a few YTS lads to try their hand at bomb disposal?
Its about as much small arms training the average RN person gets.
That's why they have Royal Marines.