Android "smart" watch...
Android "smart" watch...
Author
Discussion

Irrotational

Original Poster:

1,580 posts

219 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
Just discovered this:-

http://live.imwatch.it/

It's a watch that runs android, and syncs to your phone via bluetooth, you can make calls, get SMS's and it also shows facebook, twitter etc...

I think it looks like a genuine contender as a smart watch?

Anyone know if the processor will be up to the task? Anyone seen one in real life?

The Nur

9,168 posts

216 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
Seems like an awesome idea, but I can't be bothered with charging a watch daily tbh.

Marf

22,907 posts

272 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
The Nur said:
Seems like an awesome idea, but I can't be bothered with charging a watch daily tbh.
Pretty much my take on it, it'd need wireless charging IMO to make it viable. Price is a bit much too.

The Nur

9,168 posts

216 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
Marf said:
Pretty much my take on it, it'd need wireless charging IMO to make it viable. Price is a bit much too.
Even if it was wireless it would require me to take it off all the time, and I only take my watch off in the shower.

Don't think it is something I could really get used to.



Irrotational

Original Poster:

1,580 posts

219 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
Interesting thoughts - I wasn't too fussed about the charging as I guess you can plug it in at night...many people seem to do this with smartphones and it doesn't bother them...

Not sure about cost - it is a lot for a gadget, but then less that a phone costs*, and compared to what people spend on here on watches it is one of the cheapest that gets discussed smile


  • by that I mean it has the same kind of tech and miniaturisation as a mobile phone, so hardware will be expensive

Marf

22,907 posts

272 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
The Nur said:
Marf said:
Pretty much my take on it, it'd need wireless charging IMO to make it viable. Price is a bit much too.
Even if it was wireless it would require me to take it off all the time, and I only take my watch off in the shower.

Don't think it is something I could really get used to.
Fair point, when I used to wear a watch it'd get taken off and sit on the bedside table overnight. I guess that kinetic charging wouldnt give anywhere near enough juice.

The Nur

9,168 posts

216 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
I feel weird if I go to sleep without a watch on, the pillow isn't the right height hehe

andy_s

19,857 posts

290 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
Something like this with a rotor to generate enough power to keep it charged permanently would be interesting.

Or hellish, depending on your aversion level to twitter/facebook etc...

Balmoral Green

42,561 posts

279 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
It does look much better than previous attempts at cell watches though, from a few years ago.

toohuge

3,501 posts

247 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
andy_s said:
Something like this with a rotor to generate enough power to keep it charged permanently would be interesting.

Or hellish, depending on your aversion level to twitter/facebook etc...
Ulysse Nardin made a telephone with a rotor arrangement that was meant to charge the phone, although I am pretty sure that the amount of energy generated was no where near enough to power a modern smart phone.

Back to the original topic, I love this gagdet, it looks great and from what I can determine isn't too expensive but the 90 day lead time is incredible!

Chris

The Nur

9,168 posts

216 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
toohuge said:
but the 90 day lead time is incredible!

Chris
I would like to take a punt on one and if its crap just sell it, but 90 days is a bit much, as you have said.

Irrotational

Original Poster:

1,580 posts

219 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
These are pre-orders afaik - they haven't started shiping any yet, hence the delay.

This is the only useful video I found - the guy is just poking the screen so it's hard to tell how good the touch functionality is.

It's also the first, curved, touch screen...apparently.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhGhIhaemJ8

tvrforever

3,196 posts

296 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
I have to say that the want is strong on this one...

ApexJimi

27,781 posts

274 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
Irrotational said:
These are pre-orders afaik - they haven't started shiping any yet, hence the delay.

This is the only useful video I found - the guy is just poking the screen so it's hard to tell how good the touch functionality is.

It's also the first, curved, touch screen...apparently.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhGhIhaemJ8
The functionality looks quite slow there...

Soovy

35,829 posts

302 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all


I give it a week before Apple close them down for patent infringement.


The Nur

9,168 posts

216 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
ApexJimi said:
The functionality looks quite slow there...
In fairness, it is watch with a 454mhz processor running android 1.6. Can't really expect much else from 1st generation technology IMO.

One thing I noticed from the video though, was that the mentioned the battery life being in the region of half a day. Whether he meant 6 or 12 hours I don't know, but the thought of having to carry a spare watch irks me somewhat

ApexJimi

27,781 posts

274 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
The Nur said:
ApexJimi said:
The functionality looks quite slow there...
In fairness, it is watch with a 454mhz processor running android 1.6. Can't really expect much else from 1st generation technology IMO.

One thing I noticed from the video though, was that the mentioned the battery life being in the region of half a day. Whether he meant 6 or 12 hours I don't know, but the thought of having to carry a spare watch irks me somewhat
Yeah, that did occur to me after I posted that. By the same token though, the speed WOULD irk me, being as I am used to the Desire.

I agree that it's not very practical but it IS inherently cool, in my opinion!

The Nur

9,168 posts

216 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
Almost worth it for the cool factor alone really, but I may wait until they can fit a desire or similar into one.

Then I will have uber watch. Plus, if you combine it with one of those portable charger pack things with some rechargable batteries it may actually become a viable option.

Irrotational

Original Poster:

1,580 posts

219 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
I *think* he meant if you're talking on it constantly. The written specs are 24 hours on standby, 12 hours with bluetooth on and use and 5 hours of talk time.


The Nur

9,168 posts

216 months

Monday 31st October 2011
quotequote all
Damn, when you put it like that it sure is tempting to just place an order now...