40% VAT, could it work?
Author
Discussion

clarkey328is

Original Poster:

2,220 posts

205 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
Bear with me here, but I've had a sort of idea;
What about getting rid of every single tax and national insurance payment, including fuel tax, income tax, council tax, capital gains tax and so on and replacing it with a 30 or 40% VAT on everything? It would mean the government could cut it's spending on employment by an enormous amount and it would make evading tax absolutely impossible. A certain percentage of the revenue raised could be ring fenced to be spent on government employment projects like road building, community improvements, policing and other things that would improve the country as a whole. The theory behind this is that it would negate the rise in unemployment from public sector job losses and provide accessible work for currently unemployed people.
Another percentage of the revenue could be ring fenced to pay off the deficit.
I haven't looked closely enough at the figures to be sure of what the VAT percentage itself would need to be in order to keep revenue the same as now, but it wouldn't need to be in the long run.
The only thing that I can see being difficult is the transition. How would it be handled? Also the public sector would go nuts, but they do that anyway so no great loss there.
It's almost an extension of an idea I heard about lumping car tax onto fuel duty, but could it work on a larger scale?
Discuss.

anonymous-user

85 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
Seeing as they won't do something as simple as scrap VED and stick it on fuel this will never ever happen ever. They don't want simple tax systems.

Justayellowbadge

37,057 posts

273 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
clarkey328is said:
it would make evading tax absolutely impossible.
Of course it wouldn't.

russ_a

4,727 posts

242 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
You could avoid it easily by creating a VAT Reg company and buy everything through that.

bobbylondonuk

2,206 posts

221 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
Smuggling cheaper imports into UK should sort out the high VAT issue.

clarkey328is

Original Poster:

2,220 posts

205 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
Justayellowbadge said:
Of course it wouldn't.
How so? Everyone has to buy things from here or abroad. Simply keep the same system of charging VAT upon goods entering the country. I can't see the problem.

otolith

69,499 posts

235 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
Justayellowbadge said:
clarkey328is said:
it would make evading tax absolutely impossible.
Of course it wouldn't.
You'll be telling us next that some people buy black market tobacco to avoid paying purchase tax on them.

clarkey328is

Original Poster:

2,220 posts

205 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
russ_a said:
You could avoid it easily by creating a VAT Reg company and buy everything through that.
That would need looking into, certainly. Perhaps VAT breaks instead of VAT exemptions for companies?

glazbagun

15,380 posts

228 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
It's a tax on consumption, which is what drives modern economies, so I'm not sure you'd want to stifle that, even if everyone was income-tax free. It could also probably be argued that it would hit the poor harder than the rich- lower classes spending a higher proportion of their wealth on consumption as they do.

Black markets would probably explode, too, even if the simplification left people with more money. All in all I don't think it could sucessfully replace income tax. Though you have made me wonder- what tax on the common man was there before income tax started? Was it a VAT analogue?

clarkey328is

Original Poster:

2,220 posts

205 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
glazbagun said:
It's a tax on consumption, which is what drives modern economies, so I'm not sure you'd want to stifle that, even if everyone was income-tax free. It could also probably be argued that it would hit the poor harder than the rich- lower classes spending a higher proportion of their wealth on consumption as they do.

Black markets would probably explode, too, even if the simplification left people with more money. All in all I don't think it could sucessfully replace income tax. Though you have made me wonder- what tax on the common man was there before income tax started? Was it a VAT analogue?
People still buy things in countries that are more expensive than ours. Usually their expendable income is higher too so I don't see that, in particular, being a problem.
Sure, the black market would probably explode, but some of those ring fenced funds for policing could be allocated to increased border controls.

Justayellowbadge

37,057 posts

273 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
Well, everything I bought would be 'nearly-new', for starters.

Or would you make everyone in the country VAT register?

Puggit

49,825 posts

279 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
There is no black market within the EU - so unless the entire EU moved to the new tax regime, it would be legal to move as many goods as you like back in to the UK.

clarkey328is

Original Poster:

2,220 posts

205 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
Justayellowbadge said:
Well, everything I bought would be 'nearly-new', for starters.

Or would you make everyone in the country VAT register?
I don't know, that's why I've put it up for discussion.

clarkey328is

Original Poster:

2,220 posts

205 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
Paddy_N_Murphy said:
It would not take nearly enough Public Sector resources to administer it.

Too simples.
That's the entire point, there is a massive glaring reason why we have such an obscene deficit.

glazbagun

15,380 posts

228 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
Actually I've just had another thought. The unemployed get cash from taxpayers, which they then spend on consumption (and rent, etc). Since VAT would not discriminate between employed and unemployed, they'd be paying a much larger share of their benefits back to the state. And even a minimum wage job would begin to look appealing if it was completely tax-free.

Deva Link

26,934 posts

276 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
clarkey328is said:
What about getting rid of every single tax and national insurance payment, including fuel tax, income tax, council tax, capital gains tax and so on and replacing it with a 30 or 40% VAT on everything?

I haven't looked closely enough at the figures to be sure of what the VAT percentage itself would need to be in order to keep revenue the same as now...
It isn't hard to look up the figures - VAT would have to be near-as-dammit 100% just to make up for the revenue lost from income tax and NI, never mind the other taxes and duties.

And that's assuming spending carried on at current rates - how many people would be put off buying things if they were getting on for twice the current price?

Pretty chart here:
http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/res...

Edited by Deva Link on Thursday 3rd November 12:44

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

235 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
Or the government could stop trying to buy our votes by spending our money on stupid st

anonymous-user

85 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
russ_a said:
You could avoid it easily by creating a VAT Reg company and buy everything through that.
Creating a VAT reg company is not as simple as that.

JonnyFive

29,904 posts

220 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
Mods, delete this thread!

The Government will only read the title of 40% VAT.. Not read the thread and then think the people want 40% VAT. Noo..

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

277 months

Thursday 3rd November 2011
quotequote all
clarkey328is said:
What about getting rid of every single tax and national insurance payment, including fuel tax, income tax, council tax, capital gains tax and so on and replacing it with a 30 or 40% VAT on everything?
Thus increasing taxes dramatically on the poorest in our society while deliveroing a substantial reduction for the rich.