Why do minor shunts nearly always result in whiplash now?
Discussion
They don't have whiplash. They may think they do, And so claim no win no fee.
It's like flu: people take 2 days off work saying they have flu, but they have a cold.
People have a stiff neck the day after a car crash and say they have whiplash, then they get easy money. Just make sure you don't get seen lifting or doing anything athletic until the claim is settled.
It's like flu: people take 2 days off work saying they have flu, but they have a cold.
People have a stiff neck the day after a car crash and say they have whiplash, then they get easy money. Just make sure you don't get seen lifting or doing anything athletic until the claim is settled.
Kiltox said:
Of course I'm assuming everyone that makes a claim is genuinely injured - so did those people just MTFU and get on with it before no win no fee solicitors came around?
It didn't use to be so easy or so popular. People were either marginally more principled or marginally less greedy, I think, but the main thing is that now every man and his dog knows he can get five grand out of an insurance company just by getting in an ambulance saying his neck hurts. To be honest I think it's f
king despicable..I caused a shunt a couple of years back, my insurance on my £300 car was third party only and I wrote off the W-reg Clio I hit. The 30-something woman driving said Clio was wandering around freely at the site of the accident, at least until an ambulance arrived after someone called in a "head-on" collision. Come the letter from her solicitors and it seems I caused her "severe whiplash and lower back pain". The payout from my insurers for an accident that only claimed a £1500 car? Eleven and a half grand.
McSam said:
t didn't use to be so easy or so popular. People were either marginally more principled or marginally less greedy, I think, but the main thing is that now every man and his dog knows he can get five grand out of an insurance company just by getting in an ambulance saying his neck hurts. To be honest I think it's f
king despicable..
I caused a shunt a couple of years back, my insurance on my £300 car was third party only and I wrote off the W-reg Clio I hit. The 30-something woman driving said Clio was wandering around freely at the site of the accident, at least until an ambulance arrived after someone called in a "head-on" collision. Come the letter from her solicitors and it seems I caused her "severe whiplash and lower back pain". The payout from my insurers for an accident that only claimed a £1500 car? Eleven and a half grand.
FFS.
king despicable..I caused a shunt a couple of years back, my insurance on my £300 car was third party only and I wrote off the W-reg Clio I hit. The 30-something woman driving said Clio was wandering around freely at the site of the accident, at least until an ambulance arrived after someone called in a "head-on" collision. Come the letter from her solicitors and it seems I caused her "severe whiplash and lower back pain". The payout from my insurers for an accident that only claimed a £1500 car? Eleven and a half grand.
I had a claim agains me after someone proceeding in the wrong lane at a roundabout drove into the side of my car at ~15mph. She won, as far as I know, but I don't know what the settlment was.
No sign of injury at the scene.
Kiltox said:
FFS.
I had a claim agains me after someone proceeding in the wrong lane at a roundabout drove into the side of my car at ~15mph. She won, as far as I know, but I don't know what the settlment was.
No sign of injury at the scene.
My thoughts exactly! Getting an insurance quote as if the claim had been £1500 rather than £12000 only makes it even more painful, I've paid £300, then £200 and now £150 a year more thanks to her greedy dole-dosser neck, but hey, at least I clearly made someone happy that day.I had a claim agains me after someone proceeding in the wrong lane at a roundabout drove into the side of my car at ~15mph. She won, as far as I know, but I don't know what the settlment was.
No sign of injury at the scene.
I wonder what the outcome would be if you actually bothered to take such people to court over the amount claimed? Immediate dropping of the personal injury claim, I would suspect..
I can tell you without study what the f
king genetic defect is 
Kiltox said:
davepoth said:
The UK has ten times the rate of whiplash compared to other countries in Europe, but curiously fewer accidents.
Hmmm maybe British people are more likely to suffer from whiplash due to a genetic defect
Study is required! 

Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff






