Fined for driving in the "fast" lane - SA content
Fined for driving in the "fast" lane - SA content
Author
Discussion

Pints

Original Poster:

18,451 posts

223 months

Sunday 6th November 2011
quotequote all
Motoring.co.za said:
Refusing to give way while driving in the right, or “fast” lane could cost motorists a R1000 (about £80) fine for inconsiderate driving.

Motorist Steven Taylor (28) has refused to pay the fine he received from a Ghost Squad officer. Taylor was driving in the fast lane at about 130 km/hr on the N1.

He said an unmarked car had come up behind him and indicated he should move by flashing headlights. When he failed to give way, the officer switched on the blue lights, pulled him over and issued him with a R1000 fine for inconsiderate driving.

“If it was an emergency vehicle I would've given way immediately, but not to someone driving so close behind me and forcing me to move,” said Taylor. “I don't have a problem paying the fine if I disobeyed the law.”

Mayoral committee member for Safety and Security, JP Smith said he too had been unaware of the rules about driving in the fast lane. But once a fine had been issued, the prosecutor or magistrate handling the case would have to decide whether or not the fine could be dismissed, he said. “Once a fine has been written, we don't have the power to overturn it.”

The Special Provisions Relating to Freeways, regulation 323 in section five and six states:

-Where the driver of a motor vehicle which is being driven in the right-hand traffic lane or in the traffic lane furthest to the right on a freeway (hereinafter referred to as the first vehicle) becomes aware that the driver of another motor vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the second vehicle) intends to overtake the first vehicle, the driver of the first vehicle shall steer that vehicle to a lane to the left of the one in which he or she is driving, without endangering himself or herself or other traffic or property on the freeway, and shall not accelerate the speed of his or her vehicle until the second vehicle has passed.

-For the purposes of (above regulation) the driver of the second vehicle may make the driver of the first vehicle aware that he or she intends to overtake the first vehicle by giving the driver thereof a visible signal by means of flashing the headlights of his or her vehicle.
Source


Edited by Pints on Sunday 6th November 19:06

Budleigh

156 posts

192 months

Sunday 6th November 2011
quotequote all
It's caused some controversy over here, but it's a great idea. There are too many self-righteous types who think that the highway is just a pick-your-own-lane affair.

RevYob

3,560 posts

203 months

Sunday 6th November 2011
quotequote all
Make this law in the UK, along with harsher penalties for tailgating, it might just work.. maybe...

Herman Toothrot

6,702 posts

227 months

Sunday 6th November 2011
quotequote all
Seems a very sensbile law, one i'd actually like to see added in the UK which is a rare event.

yellowjack

18,451 posts

195 months

Sunday 6th November 2011
quotequote all
Pints said:
I understand the frustration, and MLMs piss me off just as much as they do anyone else, but what law has been broken in this instance?
"The Special Provisions Relating to Freeways, regulation 323" - the South African version of our Motorway Regulations?

FamilyDub

3,587 posts

194 months

Sunday 6th November 2011
quotequote all
Good, too many t0ssers with poor lane discipline out there - maybe this will go some ways to fixing it.

*Al*

3,830 posts

251 months

Sunday 6th November 2011
quotequote all
What's the 'Fast lane'? smile

Police State

4,367 posts

249 months

Sunday 6th November 2011
quotequote all
Budleigh said:
It's caused some controversy over here, but it's a great idea. There are too many self-righteous types who think that the highway is just a pick-your-own-lane affair.
Does that include the tossers in their all black Range-Rovers that come barreling up behind you as you're making a steady pace overtake which if they were'nt 4 feet off your back bumper, all lights blazing would be just another moment in motorway motoring, but instead turns into a stressfull sitation for no other reason than billy big bks is in a rush and has a far more important right to be where he is rather than where you may happen to find yourself, in the pissing rain with limited visibility?


EvoBarry

1,903 posts

294 months

Sunday 6th November 2011
quotequote all
*Al* said:
What's the 'Fast lane'? smile
This /\

Its an overtaking lane, if you are not overtaking you should get stopped and asked to explain yourself.. and fined if you don't have a decent excuse.

Of course, this would require Police men in cars, something we seem to be lacking these days?

CaptainSlow

13,179 posts

241 months

Sunday 6th November 2011
quotequote all
*Al* said:
What's the 'Fast lane'? smile
It's known as the 'Audi lane' over here.

Tallbut Buxomly

12,254 posts

245 months

Sunday 6th November 2011
quotequote all
Interesting to read as it was in SA that I learnt to drive and where it is made very clear from the getgo that you keep left pass right and seemed to be well observed the last time i was out there.


yellowjack

18,451 posts

195 months

Sunday 6th November 2011
quotequote all
Police State said:
Does that include the tossers in their all black Range-Rovers that come barreling up behind you as you're making a steady pace overtake which if they were'nt 4 feet off your back bumper, all lights blazing would be just another moment in motorway motoring, but instead turns into a stressfull sitation for no other reason than billy big bks is in a rush and has a far more important right to be where he is rather than where you may happen to find yourself, in the pissing rain with limited visibility?
As it stands, this: "the driver of the first vehicle shall steer that vehicle to a lane to the left of the one in which he or she is driving, without endangering himself or herself or other traffic" in the original post, means you, as the FIRST overtaker, would not be required to move to the left unless/until it was safe to do so. Whilst not entirely sensible, given average M-way speeds these days, you are actually entitled, NAY REQUIRED, by law, to overtake in the right-most lane of a motorway whilst NOT EXCEEDING 70MPH. Needless to say, the treatment meted out by following drivers to people who do occupy the 'fast' lane at 70mph is enough to put you off. Worst experience personally was whilst driving late at night, at 85+mph, in lane three, convoy of HGVs in lane one, convoy of cars/vans passing them in lane two, no safe break in the traffic to move left. Barrelling up behind me in excess of 100mph on a dark/unlit section of M3 comes a massive Toyota pick up who procedes to give me the benefit of the three massive lamps mounted on the 'roll bar' and when I eventually reach the front of the convoy to my left, (where I planned to move over anyway) procedes to repeatedly swerve/swing his cock-mobile toward me in lane 2. Police officers patrolling in cars is the only way to tackle these mongs, and for all our sakes they need taking off the roads.

Police State

4,367 posts

249 months

Sunday 6th November 2011
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
As it stands, this: "the driver of the first vehicle shall steer that vehicle to a lane to the left of the one in which he or she is driving, without endangering himself or herself or other traffic" in the original post, means you, as the FIRST overtaker, would not be required to move to the left unless/until it was safe to do so. Whilst not entirely sensible, given average M-way speeds these days, you are actually entitled, NAY REQUIRED, by law, to overtake in the right-most lane of a motorway whilst NOT EXCEEDING 70MPH. Needless to say, the treatment meted out by following drivers to people who do occupy the 'fast' lane at 70mph is enough to put you off. Worst experience personally was whilst driving late at night, at 85+mph, in lane three, convoy of HGVs in lane one, convoy of cars/vans passing them in lane two, no safe break in the traffic to move left. Barrelling up behind me in excess of 100mph on a dark/unlit section of M3 comes a massive Toyota pick up who procedes to give me the benefit of the three massive lamps mounted on the 'roll bar' and when I eventually reach the front of the convoy to my left, (where I planned to move over anyway) procedes to repeatedly swerve/swing his cock-mobile toward me in lane 2. Police officers patrolling in cars is the only way to tackle these mongs, and for all our sakes they need taking off the roads.
never ceases to amaze me how the unmarked cars always *seem to pull over speeding cars, but always seem to miss the utter tosser that just passed me while weaving in and out and anywhere else he thought his peerless driving skills could be tested.

A while ago, I watched an unmarked car pulling over a black 996 Carrera 4S doing about a steady 85 on the M1 southbound, in the right hand lane/overtaking lane/fast lane in very light/perfectly clear traffic/perfect driving conditions. I have seen this driver a number of times, and never once seen him driving badly/taking the piss/tailgating/bullying. Equally I have seen the same feckin Range-Rover bullies, bullying their way through traffic 4 feet off numpties bumper. Perhaps, he was also pulled at some point, but somehow I doubt it. Has anyone ever seen a Range-Rover pulled over by the cops?

  • just always seems like it.

frosted

3,549 posts

206 months

Sunday 6th November 2011
quotequote all
RevYob said:
Make this law in the UK, along with harsher penalties for tailgating, it might just work.. maybe...
How about just get out the way then ?

Pints

Original Poster:

18,451 posts

223 months

Monday 7th November 2011
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
"The Special Provisions Relating to Freeways, regulation 323" - the South African version of our Motorway Regulations?
I realised that as soon as I posted, hence post deletion. smile

Pints

Original Poster:

18,451 posts

223 months

Monday 7th November 2011
quotequote all
*Al* said:
What's the 'Fast lane'? smile
It's what those crazy South Africans (or their incompetent journalists) call the outside lane.

Colonial

13,553 posts

234 months

Monday 7th November 2011
quotequote all
Australia has the same law.

Shame it is never ever policed.

*Al*

3,830 posts

251 months

Monday 7th November 2011
quotequote all
Colonial said:
Australia has the same law.

Shame it is never ever policed.
When i drove in Oz in August my relations said people could pass in any lane (3 lane highway), is this correct?

Kickstart68

182 posts

194 months

Monday 7th November 2011
quotequote all
*Al* said:
When i drove in Oz in August my relations said people could pass in any lane (3 lane highway), is this correct?
My experience in Aus suggested that as long as you passed quietly so as no to wake the driver of the other car it was fine...

All the best

Keith

C8PPO

20,861 posts

232 months

Monday 7th November 2011
quotequote all
Police State said:
Does that include the tossers in their all black Range-Rovers that come barreling up behind you as you're making a steady pace overtake which if they were'nt 4 feet off your back bumper, all lights blazing would be just another moment in motorway motoring, but instead turns into a stressfull sitation for no other reason than billy big bks is in a rush and has a far more important right to be where he is rather than where you may happen to find yourself, in the pissing rain with limited visibility?
Been meaning to ask, how ARE you getting on with your nice little hatchback? hehe