100,000th mile in my 996 3.4 and...
100,000th mile in my 996 3.4 and...
Author
Discussion

danielw

Original Poster:

210 posts

279 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
it's still going strong!

Picked up my 996 last night (full savannah interior BTW, still a much less oppressive place to sit than black, blue or grey) from Hartech after a minor oil leak had been fixed (crankcase, not RMS you doom mongers!) and it flew past its 100,000th mile on the M6 toll.

I've owned it for three years and it's still on its original engine, probably won't use any oil now the leak is fixed and it really doesn't clonk and rattle much more than it did when I bought it.

Talking to Grant at Hartech it seems that the 3.4 996 doesn't suffer the potential overheating problem as the later 996's and 997's which is an added bonus of the older cars.

Much as I occasionally get the urge for something newer, shinier and faster (although one of the mags figured a 996 3.4 at 4.6s 0-60 which compares well to the later slightly heavier cars), its now worth peanuts and I can't imagine what i'd do my annual trips over the Alps in instead.

Roll on the next 100,000!

EVOeng

966 posts

201 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
danielw said:
Much as I occasionally get the urge for something newer, shinier and faster (although one of the mags figured a 996 3.4 at 4.6s 0-60 which compares well to the later slightly heavier cars), its now worth peanuts and I can't imagine what i'd do my annual trips over the Alps in instead.
I know exactly what you mean - I remember an issue of EVO comparing the 996 3.4 against the Ferrari 355 and guess which car was preferred? It was the Porsche!
Fantastic value for money they are too - I do not really see why - perfect sister car to my GT2.

Diesel130

1,549 posts

243 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
danielw said:
Much as I occasionally get the urge for something newer, shinier and faster (although one of the mags figured a 996 3.4 at 4.6s 0-60 which compares well to the later slightly heavier cars), its now worth peanuts and I can't imagine what i'd do my annual trips over the Alps in instead.
+1 smile Only on about 73,000 miles here, but off to the Lake District for the weekend wink

Ian58

132 posts

190 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
Just done the same in my 1998 996 and still going strong ,although did fit the ims upgrade as a preventative measure ,hope to enjoy many more miles in the old girl and like you said now worth peanuts but priceless to me

Spice_Weasel

2,368 posts

284 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
Same here. 2000 C2 that has now done 83,000 miles. Worth a fraction of what I paid in 2004 but it has so much character (air-cooled owners stand down your beards) compared with a 997.

The always-on PSE may have something to do with it!

Chris Stott

19,849 posts

228 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
109,000 in my '00 3.4

anonymous-user

85 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
There was an interesting article in one of the Porsche mags back in 2008 when the recession first hit, discussing bargain Porsches. One prime example was an early 996 (going for £15K at the time which was considered rock bottom back then). They rated the 3.4 very highly even compared to the '08 997 and of course fantastic value for money. Even better value today with similar cars hovering around the £10K mark! Though it should be noted that the car in the article was on engine number two, the original having blown up at 30K ish miles if I remember correctly.

Martian O

2,734 posts

193 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
I know a guy with a '98 3.4 with over 200K on the odo. Still on the original engine with no RMS/IMS problems....

GT Glee

705 posts

206 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
Martian O said:
I know a guy with a '98 3.4 with over 200K on the odo. Still on the original engine with no RMS/IMS problems....
And not one top end rebuild.

thegoose

8,077 posts

241 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
The first 996 I had with over 100K on it was a 1997 C2 coupe in 2000!!

It had been owned by the chairman (or similar) of DFS and was absolute Christmas tree spec - ruffled savannah leather, nav, phone, sport chassis with traction control, bum-wart parking sensors, 18's, DSP (pre-BOSE), memory seats, sunroof, heated seats.

scratchchin I wonder how many miles that's done now (assuming it's still going and not been altered rolleyes )

cardigankid

8,880 posts

243 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
So are we saying that an old 3.4 is better than an old 3.6?

clarkey979

44 posts

234 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
Great! I'm on a 996c4 hit 103,000!miles, but am on a 10k old new engine. Though it didn't die due to the usual 3.4 issues.... It's a brilliant car, I can't believe what you can get for your money nowadays! We are really lucky in that respect in the uk

ScienceTeacher

408 posts

216 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
cardigankid said:
So are we saying that an old 3.4 is better than an old 3.6?
Possibly!

I think they look rather chic...

anonymous-user

85 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
cardigankid said:
So are we saying that an old 3.4 is better than an old 3.6?
No, just cheaper which could be seen as better value for money in some cases

Niffty951

2,401 posts

259 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
Good work but touch wood too. I said this about my clutch which felt amazing at 45k miles after everything I'd read said it would need replacing... 3days later I felt it slip, 1 hour after that I was barely able to drive it banghead sods law must have been laughing at it's success.

Edited by Niffty951 on Thursday 10th November 21:09

shipley

266 posts

286 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
Finally a thread with good news smile

I have a 98 C2 3.4 with 75k and love it. Its depressing reading all the tales of woe on this and other sites.

I love mine - every trip is exciting and to me it feels very special.


clarkey979

44 posts

234 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
One other thing, whether it's how well owners look after these cars or how well they are put together, I am amazed at just how solid and tight it feels being 10 years old and having done over 100 k. I have had much newer, lower mileage cars that have felt their age. Another reason why the 3.4 is such good value for money, it doesn't feel a lifetime away from being new. That and the performance on tap, handling, controls and heritage - such a bargain.

cragswinter

21,429 posts

227 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
I've said it before & I'll say it again, there's sine bloke who bimbles arou d Carlisle in an early (R reg) silver 3.4 & it just looks so good. Perfect stance (sits quite low compared to modern cars), sensible wheels & fried egg headlights.

The 3.4 renaissance* is upon us!









  • or at least they're so cheap now they can't fail to look great smile

yeti

10,704 posts

306 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
What great timing for this thread - off to look at a 3.4 996 C4 Cabrio tomorrow. All boxes tixed except heated seats but Southbound Trimmers can retrofit them for me if Ebay doesn't turn up a set.

What a car for the money, hope this one checks out service history wise.

71k miles seems fine as well, just hope he can prove it with a few old MOTs etc.

carparkno1

1,438 posts

189 months

Friday 11th November 2011
quotequote all
Yeah ffs keep the good news quiet! I have my eyes firmly fixed on a fried-egg from the late 90s/2001 and want it cheap. Am budgeting for 12-15k for a decent one in the next 3-6 months.

Really really want to get one that has been driven, appreciated, and is honest. I know you take a chane with IMS and bore-scoring etc but the early 996 really appeals to me - hoping the prices stay where they are!

ps what's the average mpg people are getting for a standard 996 carrera?