Are The 2002 on E Class Reliable / Non Rusty ?
Are The 2002 on E Class Reliable / Non Rusty ?
Author
Discussion

redgriff500

Original Poster:

28,982 posts

287 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
I know merc had rust / quality issues from 95/6 were they sorted by the facelift 2002 on E class ?

I'm considering a E220 CDi for my wife.

Thanks

bqf

2,289 posts

195 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
They don't rust to any great degree no - and they are very reliable. There are a couple of well known issues - the front springs will break at some point, and there is a radiator issue (well documented on here - search 'Valeo').

They're a great buy - although I would counsel getting a 270CDi if you can locate a good one - much quicker than a 220 and very similar mpg. I got over 700 miles to a tank (80 litres) from my E270, and it was the quitest, most comfortable car I have ever had. I loved it - only sold it to buy an E55.

GreatGranny

9,519 posts

250 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
Its a car (in estate form) I would love to have one day but probably either the 270 or 320.

The 220 always strikes me as being a bit weedy with 150 & 251 torques in something with a max weight of 2.1 tonnes!

Just looked on Atrader and the 270 has 18% more power & 20% more torques.

They are about £500 more to buy. The 320 is probably £500 more again.

redgriff500

Original Poster:

28,982 posts

287 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
Re power - its for my wife so won't exceed 70 and will never overtake anything.

I only care what it will cost me.

angusc43

13,325 posts

232 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
The 210 made way to the 211 in 2002. The 211 was subsequently facelifted in 2005 (IIRC)

The 210 has a poor reputation for rust. The 211's are far better in this regard and were part-galvanised from the off, fully galvanised but the time they were facelifted.

The late, pre-facelift 211's started to benefit from a host of improvements (eg they reverted to hand-fitted looms rather than robot-fitted ones).

The facelift 211's then had another round of under-the-cover improvements. The most obvious ones being the engines. The diesel multi's went from being inline 6's to V6's and are reportedly far smoother, more powerful and more economical.

I have a late pre-facelift E500 with stacks of kit. It's on 103k now and everything works just fine. It feels very well built to me.

If you are looking at diesels why not see if you can get one of the smaller multi? The 270 was a 5 cyl, the 280 is a V6. The only one I have tried is the 280. I'm not a big fan of diesels but I was impressed.

Volvo360

8,202 posts

175 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
I was looking at these recently and opinion seemed to be that they were vastly improved in 2006, and you can tell the improved ones from the pre-improvement ones because they've got three "louvres" on the headlights. I think it was electrical gremlins being sorted out, if I recall correctly.

redgriff500

Original Poster:

28,982 posts

287 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
Problem is 06 start at £8k (below 100k) which is more than I wanted to spend really as by the time I find a decent spec, mileage and leather it'll be closer to 10k.



Volvo360

8,202 posts

175 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
Hmm. I'd go for a Volvo S80 at that sort of budget, rather than risk an E Class of that age.

But I'm pretty risk averse by nature.

redgriff500

Original Poster:

28,982 posts

287 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
Volvo360 said:
Hmm. I'd go for a Volvo S80 at that sort of budget, rather than risk an E Class of that age.

But I'm pretty risk averse by nature.
Having had a dismal (low mileage) XC90 I'm loathe to go back to Volvo

DJRC

23,563 posts

260 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
A 2002 Merc? Not a chance in hell.

Post 2004 only is when the quality started to improve.

bqf

2,289 posts

195 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
The 2004 update is the one that made a difference, thats true - earlier cars seemed to suffer quite a bit from various gremlins (all well discussed on here already)

A 2005 220/270 should be had for £5-6k

redgriff500

Original Poster:

28,982 posts

287 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
Great thanks - 04 facelift is within budget.

Jw Vw

4,908 posts

187 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
DJRC said:
A 2002 Merc? Not a chance in hell.

Post 2004 only is when the quality started to improve.
This.

I would avoid all Mercs '96-'06. Woeful quality.