XJR - running without SC belt
Discussion
Was chatting with someone who suggested that if the weather turns bad, it would be sensible to remove the SC belt to lower the amount of power and torque and therefore help with traction in snow/ice.
Can you run without the SC belt connected for extended periods without it becoming an issue? Doesn't the ECU expect a load of compressed air, and adjust the fuelling to match?
Can you run without the SC belt connected for extended periods without it becoming an issue? Doesn't the ECU expect a load of compressed air, and adjust the fuelling to match?
My X300 3.2 sport is hopeless in the snow wearing P6000s.
Reducing the torque from the XJR engine might help a little, perhaps from very totally undrivable to just totally undrivable.
I'd vote for Avos suggestion too.
The Mrs' MB barge was equally bad, bought her a set of winter snow tyres last year and just couldn't believe the difference. As long as you don't go silly then you seemed to just be able to drive.
Reducing the torque from the XJR engine might help a little, perhaps from very totally undrivable to just totally undrivable.
I'd vote for Avos suggestion too.
The Mrs' MB barge was equally bad, bought her a set of winter snow tyres last year and just couldn't believe the difference. As long as you don't go silly then you seemed to just be able to drive.
Yes the car will work but power will be even LESS than a N/A engine as the compression ratio is less and the breathing will be through the bypass valve
As Avos said a LSD will help as well as Winter Tyres
You can get LSDiffs fron TLJaguar 0118-976-2899 as you know
I have a LSD in my XKR helps get the power to the road in all condition,
in-fact it's so good I have the Traction Controll OFF most of the time
As Avos said a LSD will help as well as Winter Tyres
You can get LSDiffs fron TLJaguar 0118-976-2899 as you know
I have a LSD in my XKR helps get the power to the road in all condition,
in-fact it's so good I have the Traction Controll OFF most of the time
varsas said:
I think the supercharger is de-clutched at low revs, isn't it?
I find it hard to believe the ECU won't go mental, the fueling map will be all wrong as well...
It is de-clutched, yes. Not sure to what point, though.I find it hard to believe the ECU won't go mental, the fueling map will be all wrong as well...
The fuelling map was my concern, too. Surely it would be expecting a load of compressed air, and add fuel accordingly? Or will the reading from the lambda sensor lean it out?
Output Flange said:
varsas said:
I think the supercharger is de-clutched at low revs, isn't it?
I find it hard to believe the ECU won't go mental, the fueling map will be all wrong as well...
It is de-clutched, yes. Not sure to what point, though.I find it hard to believe the ECU won't go mental, the fueling map will be all wrong as well...
The fuelling map was my concern, too. Surely it would be expecting a load of compressed air, and add fuel accordingly? Or will the reading from the lambda sensor lean it out?
I dare say 'boost pressure' is an input to the map, and even if not the car will know how much air is going in via the air mass sensor so I reckon so you might be OK...assuming you don't run out of map, i.e. go so far outside the values the car expects (e.g. no boost, full throttle, 5,000rpm) that you go outside the parameters the map can handle? Do that and the ECU will get very upset very quickly and probably stop ignition.
Actually, I think I have changed my mind. I reckon that the lack of boost will throw up an error, and the ECU will shut the engine down however by itself I think the car will be able to cope with a lack of boost and that the ECU should be able to compensate. Maybe.
Gassing Station | Jaguar | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




