Ethical Shoppers in not that ethical shocker
Discussion
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/re...
Or, Guardian readership are hypocrites shocker.
mattviatura said:
I thoroughly resent the hijacking of the word 'ethical' and the attendant inference that those who choose not to subscribe to whatever BBC or Guardian balls du jour is being peddled are somehow devoid of ethics.
..And the word ‘progressive’, as in the non-existent ‘progressive Majority’ oft used by the hopelessly deluded.I wonder if the same group think that wind farms and other 'Green Energy solutions' are 'Ethical', in light of the increasing numbers of our own poor and vulnerable descending into abject fuel poverty.
ChrisW_77 said:
mattviatura said:
Yep. You've got me thinking now, what other Tony Blair vocabulary was there?
Stakeholder is one that springs to mind.
"Hard working families" Stakeholder is one that springs to mind.
Anyway, wandering O/T, back to "ethical shoppers" - did we really need a report to tell us that people overstate their "good" behaviour and understate their "bad" behaviour when questioned? No s
t Sherlock 
mattviatura said:
I thoroughly resent the hijacking of the word 'ethical' and the attendant inference that those who choose not to subscribe to whatever BBC or Guardian balls du jour is being peddled are somehow devoid of ethics.
That's nothing on how much I resent how "Environmentally friendly" means not creating CO2. Don't worry about about destroying rainforests, pesticides, bleach, wiping out animal species etc... Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



