Bugatti - Disabled parking
Discussion
Without wanting to sound like an arse, does anyone really think the Bug owner would care about a 40 quid parking ticket? For speed and convenience, maybe parking there was the best option for him, and worth a paltry fine.
I'm not commenting on whether this is right or acceptable to preventing someone with a genuine disability from parking up- that's a whole other argument. Especially if there was just one disabled parking bay.
I'm not commenting on whether this is right or acceptable to preventing someone with a genuine disability from parking up- that's a whole other argument. Especially if there was just one disabled parking bay.
Whitean3 said:
Without wanting to sound like an arse, does anyone really think the Bug owner would care about a 40 quid parking ticket? For speed and convenience, maybe parking there was the best option for him, and worth a paltry fine.
I'm not commenting on whether this is right or acceptable to preventing someone with a genuine disability from parking up- that's a whole other argument. Especially if there was just one disabled parking bay.
The spaces are bigger too, so less likely to get door dents.I'm not commenting on whether this is right or acceptable to preventing someone with a genuine disability from parking up- that's a whole other argument. Especially if there was just one disabled parking bay.
Cost of a door dent in a Veyron = £1000?
Cost of someone's coat scratching the paint = £5000?
Cost of ticket = £40
marcusjames said:
It's not the most expensive car..mrmr96 said:
kbf1981 said:
The spaces are bigger too, so less likely to get door dents.
Cost of a door dent in a Veyron = £1000?
Cost of someone's coat scratching the paint = £5000?
Cost of ticket = £40
haha, yeah that!Cost of a door dent in a Veyron = £1000?
Cost of someone's coat scratching the paint = £5000?
Cost of ticket = £40
I think it's worse when you see the number of people who use 'disabled' badges on cars to park where they want and clearly are abusing the system as they are not the disabled person or don't have them with them in the car or pick them up.
having family mmebers who had such badges and needed the spaces due to their limited mobility, they would frequently complain that they couldnt find an empty disaled space and had to park elsewhere or abort the trip
Wish the police would concentrate on the abusers and remove their badges. I think the statistic is 40% are wrongly used? Read it in some Government paper
Paul
having family mmebers who had such badges and needed the spaces due to their limited mobility, they would frequently complain that they couldnt find an empty disaled space and had to park elsewhere or abort the trip
Wish the police would concentrate on the abusers and remove their badges. I think the statistic is 40% are wrongly used? Read it in some Government paper
Paul
paulqv said:
Wish the police would concentrate on the abusers and remove their badges. I think the statistic is 40% are wrongly used? Read it in some Government paper
They seem to hand disabled badges out like confetti. I think they should be a bit more selective on who is eligible for them.threesixty said:
They seem to hand disabled badges out like confetti. I think they should be a bit more selective on who is eligible for them.
I'm not sure that the eligibility criteria is wrong. What's wrong is when the eligible person loans the badge out to their family and friends to use when they're not there.Gassing Station | Supercar General | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff