Mate bought a car, no category but passed VIC
Mate bought a car, no category but passed VIC
Author
Discussion

DavidHM

Original Poster:

3,940 posts

229 months

Sunday 4th December 2011
quotequote all
I'm stumped with this. A friend of mine bought an immaculate, tiny mileage Peugeot 206 - £4k at 20k miles on an 04 plate. That's top money, although the car is very, very clean, the part exchange was generous and the car has a good spec.

Unfortunately he didn't do an HPI check beforehand and has now used an app to check after seeing that the car has been hit to the side:



He's kicking himself, of course, but what I'd like to know is what the likely history of the car is. For what reason would a car, already registered in the UK, undergo a VIC at one year old, unless it was returned to the road as a Cat C?

From a Sale of Goods point of view, the "as described" and "fit for purpose" conditions may be difficult but there may be an argument around "satisfactory quality." The ad doesn't mention that the car is HPI clear although it is described as being in "showroom condition" and the dealer's website states that it offers HPI checks as a service, so a naive buyer should be seen as having some protection, especially given the price paid.

Finally, can anyone recommend a good vehicle history check? Cheap is good, but comprehensive is more important; sadly indemnity/insurance isn't important.

Edited by DavidHM on Sunday 4th December 19:49

DavidHM

Original Poster:

3,940 posts

229 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
Bouncing for the day crew...

Mods, if you think this would do better in SP&L, please put it there.

gazchap

1,546 posts

212 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
DavidHM said:
Bouncing for the day crew...

Mods, if you think this would do better in SP&L, please put it there.
I'd just get a proper HPI check, in my experience the ones you get from cheap apps etc. are inaccurate, possibly to make you call a premium rate number to check if it's correct or not...

DavidHM

Original Poster:

3,940 posts

229 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
In case anyone ever googles this and finds it... latest from the data supplier, not the dealer, is that the VIC information is a mistake and the DVLA record is clear.

So it looks as though everything is okay.