new SLK AMG economy 34mpg-will petrol replace diesel soon?
new SLK AMG economy 34mpg-will petrol replace diesel soon?
Author
Discussion

philcray

Original Poster:

864 posts

232 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
Saw the review in the paper at the weekend - SLK AMG claiming 34mpg on the combined cycle - I appreciate that the engine runs on 4 cylinders at lower load which helps improve economy.

I also seem to recall that the 3 litre SLK does about 40mpg on the combined cycle - the question is, when are these economical engines going to appear across the rest of the range? I am considering a new model E class estate and would jump at a petrol doing a real world 40mpg (not too fussed about the performance, within reason).

I think most people would prefer a petrol engine so, with these performance engines able to record these figures, surely it is only a matter of time before diesel fall back out of favour?


bakerstreet

5,039 posts

194 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
Are these road test figures or what the manufactures are claiming? Do we not take these figures with a hefty dose of salt?

The Chevvy V8 LS series engines are capable of 30mpg on a run aren't they?

The new VAG 1.4TSFI is meant to be very good for economy for a petrol.

Stegel

2,080 posts

203 months

Monday 5th December 2011
quotequote all
I think it will be a while yet - I've had 2 near identical C class estates as courtesy vehicles recently, both automatic, both Sport models, both with stop-start etc.. A 220CDI averaged 46mpg over varied roads. I've only had the petrol 250 for a day, but on a 100 miles of similar driving it did 30.9mpg. It has only done 1,500 miles (as opposed to 6,000 miles for the diesel) but I can't see that accounting for the massive difference.

tcant

308 posts

240 months

Wednesday 7th December 2011
quotequote all
I'm driving the new C350 Coupe with the 3.5 litre petrol engine. It is quoted to do 40.4 mpg on the combined cycle and after 1300 miles I have averaged 34 mpg. I think 40mpg is achievable, I just don't get much 'extra urban' driving on my route to work.

I love the free revving responsiveness of a petrol engine and paying more for diesel to get 5-10 MPG more just doesn't justify it for me.

Cooldudeoli

256 posts

243 months

Thursday 8th December 2011
quotequote all
tcant said:
I'm driving the new C350 Coupe with the 3.5 litre petrol engine. It is quoted to do 40.4 mpg on the combined cycle and after 1300 miles I have averaged 34 mpg. I think 40mpg is achievable, I just don't get much 'extra urban' driving on my route to work.

I love the free revving responsiveness of a petrol engine and paying more for diesel to get 5-10 MPG more just doesn't justify it for me.
That's really impressive tbh, I hadn't realised how good the petrol engines had got.